Breaking Down Achilles Therapeutics plc (ACHL) Financial Health: Key Insights for Investors

Breaking Down Achilles Therapeutics plc (ACHL) Financial Health: Key Insights for Investors

GB | Healthcare | Biotechnology | NASDAQ

Achilles Therapeutics plc (ACHL) Bundle

Get Full Bundle:
$12 $7
$12 $7
$12 $7
$12 $7
$25 $15
$12 $7
$12 $7
$12 $7
$12 $7

TOTAL:

You're looking for a clear picture of Achilles Therapeutics plc's (ACHL) financial health, and honestly, the most critical insight is the final one: the company entered liquidation in March 2025. This wasn't a slow fade; it was a hard stop that followed a tough strategic pivot and a voluntary delisting from Nasdaq. The last reported financial data showed a significant cash burn, with a net loss of $19.6 million in the third quarter of 2024, which quickly eroded the cash position that analysts had projected would support operations through 2025. The final, desperate move was the sale of technology assets from the TRACERx NSCLC study to AstraZeneca for $12 million, a transaction that provided a small financial cushion but not enough to save the company. The market cap, which stood at roughly $60.83 million just before the final collapse, tells the story of a promising clinical-stage biotech that ultimately ran out of runway. So, what does a financial breakdown of a liquidated company look like? It's a post-mortem on cash burn and strategic risk.

Revenue Analysis

You're looking for a clear revenue picture for Achilles Therapeutics plc (ACHL), but the story for 2025 is less about growth and more about a strategic wind-down, which dramatically changes the revenue profile. The key takeaway is that the company's final significant revenue came from selling its core non-clinical assets, not from product sales or traditional milestones.

As a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company, Achilles Therapeutics plc never had revenue from commercial product sales. Instead, its revenue streams came from non-recurring sources like collaboration agreements, licensing deals, and grant funding. This model is typical for early-stage biotech, but it also makes revenue volatile and unpredictable. The major event that defines the revenue for the period leading into 2025 was the monetization of its intellectual property (IP).

Here's the quick math on the final revenue contribution:

  • Primary Revenue Source: Asset Sale/Licensing (one-time event).
  • FY 2023 Revenue: $2.2 million.
  • Q1 2024 Revenue: $0 (zero revenue reported).
  • Key Near-Term Revenue: $12 million from AstraZeneca asset transfer.

The $12 Million AstraZeneca Transaction

The most important revenue figure for investors to consider in the context of the 2025 liquidation is the $12 million payment received from AstraZeneca. This was not a traditional collaboration milestone but a one-time sale of technology assets-specifically, the commercial license of data and samples from the TRACERx Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) study and the Material Acquisition Platform (MAP). This transaction, announced in December 2024, essentially became the company's final, major source of income as it prepared for its voluntary liquidation, which was approved by shareholders and effective on March 20, 2025.

To be fair, this $12 million figure is an anomaly. If you were to calculate a year-over-year (YoY) revenue growth rate based on the prior year's reported revenue of $2.2 million (FY 2023), the growth would be astronomical and misleading. The reality is that the company's operating model had collapsed, leading to the discontinuation of its main clinical trials (CHIRON and THETIS) and the decision to liquidate. This sale represents a return of capital, not a sustainable business segment.

The table below shows the shift from volatile collaboration revenue to a single, final asset sale, highlighting why the traditional biotech revenue model failed to sustain operations into a full 2025 fiscal year.

Revenue Segment Source/Description Contribution to Final Period Revenue (2025 Context)
Collaboration & Licensing Non-recurring payments, grants, and research funding. The $12 million AstraZeneca asset sale is the dominant, final entry.
Product Sales Commercial sale of approved therapies. $0 (Zero, as a clinical-stage company).
Historical Trend (FY 2023) Revenue from prior agreements/grants. $2.2 million (Represented a 42.1% decrease from FY 2022).

This is defintely a case where the 'revenue' number is really a liquidation value for IP. For a deeper dive into the company's overall financial health and the implications of the liquidation, check out the full post at Breaking Down Achilles Therapeutics plc (ACHL) Financial Health: Key Insights for Investors. Finance: Track the final distribution process and the remaining cash position against the $12 million inflow.

Profitability Metrics

You need to understand the profitability of Achilles Therapeutics plc (ACHL) not through traditional metrics, but through its cash burn rate, as it was a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company. The most critical piece of 2025 data is the company's status: Achilles Therapeutics plc was appointed to liquidation on March 20, 2025, which is the ultimate measure of its financial viability.

The core profitability ratios-Gross Profit, Operating Profit, and Net Profit Margins-are fundamentally non-existent or negative for a pre-revenue biotech firm like Achilles Therapeutics plc. For the periods leading into 2025, the company reported $0 in revenue, which means the Gross Profit Margin was 0%. This is a common situation, but it means all operational costs directly translate into losses. You're essentially investing in a balance sheet (cash runway) and a research pipeline, not current earnings.

Here's the quick math on the company's burn rate and profitability trends leading up to the 2025 strategic shift:

  • Gross Profit Margin: 0% (N/A) due to $0 in product revenue.
  • Operating Profit Margin: Effectively Negative Infinity (N/A), as operating expenses vastly exceeded zero revenue.
  • Net Profit Margin: Consistently and deeply negative, with a Net Loss of -$69.7 million for the full year 2023.

This is a capital-intensive business, and the cash drain is the key metric.

Analysis of Operational Efficiency and Cost Management

Operational efficiency in a pre-revenue biotech is about managing the research and development (R&D) spend to extend the cash runway (the time until the cash runs out). Achilles Therapeutics plc did show some cost management efforts, but the magnitude of the loss remained significant, ultimately leading to the 2025 liquidation. The company's final reported quarterly net loss before the liquidation was -$12.3 million for Q1 2024.

The primary expenses were R&D and General and Administrative (G&A), which together totaled $75.3 million in 2023. To manage this, the company undertook significant actions in late 2024 and early 2025, including discontinuing its primary clinical program and implementing a workforce reduction. This is the difficult reality of clinical-stage investing.

Metric FY 2023 (USD Millions) Q1 2024 (USD Millions) Q3 2025 Peer Example
Revenue / Sales $0.0 $0.0 $9.1 (BioHarvest Sciences)
Gross Profit $0.0 $0.0 $5.6 (BioHarvest Sciences)
Operating Expenses (R&D + G&A) $75.3 $14.3 $3.3 (Marker Therapeutics)
Net Loss -$69.7 -$12.3 -$2.0 (Marker Therapeutics)
Net Profit Margin N/A (or Negative Infinity) N/A (or Negative Infinity) N/A (for clinical-stage)

Profitability Ratios vs. Industry Averages

Comparing Achilles Therapeutics plc's margins to revenue-generating biotech companies, or even those with early commercial products, highlights the immense risk. While companies like Twist Bioscience reported a full-year 2025 Gross Margin of 50.7%, and Profound Medical hit 74.3% in Q3 2025, Achilles Therapeutics plc's 0% gross margin confirms it never crossed the commercialization chasm. Even a clinical-stage peer like Marker Therapeutics, also in immuno-oncology, reported a much smaller Net Loss of $2.0 million in Q3 2025, suggesting a lower monthly burn rate or more successful cost control.

The sale of technology assets to AstraZeneca for $12 million in late 2024 was a crucial, one-time cash infusion, but it wasn't a sustainable business model. The company's final strategic move in 2025 was a value-realization event, not a pivot to profitability. For a deeper look at the institutional money that backed this high-risk model, you should check out Exploring Achilles Therapeutics plc (ACHL) Investor Profile: Who's Buying and Why?

Your action here is to recognize that a 0% Gross Margin company with a high burn rate is a binary bet on a clinical breakthrough, and once that bet fails, liquidation is defintely the most likely outcome.

Debt vs. Equity Structure

You're looking at Achilles Therapeutics plc (ACHL)'s balance sheet to understand how they finance their operations, and the immediate takeaway is clear: this is a company overwhelmingly funded by equity, not debt. Their financial structure is typical of an early-stage biotechnology firm that relies on capital raises to fund its cash-intensive clinical trials, not on bank loans or corporate bonds.

For the most recent trailing twelve months (TTM) leading into 2025, Achilles Therapeutics plc (ACHL) reported a total debt of only around $3.62 million. This minimal debt level is dwarfed by their cash position, which stood at approximately $86.05 million. This is a net cash position of over $82 million, a sign of extreme balance sheet conservatism, or, more accurately, a function of their business model.

Here's the quick math on their leverage:

  • Total Debt (TTM): ~$3.62 million
  • Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM): 0.04

A Debt-to-Equity (D/E) ratio of 0.04 means that for every dollar of shareholder equity, Achilles Therapeutics plc (ACHL) has only four cents of debt. That's incredibly low. To be fair, the average D/E ratio for the US Biotechnology industry in 2025 is around 0.17, and even that is considered low compared to capital-intensive sectors. Achilles Therapeutics plc (ACHL) is practically debt-free, a common characteristic of pre-revenue biotech companies that rely on equity funding-like their initial public offering (IPO) and subsequent follow-on offerings-to keep the lights on and fund R&D.

The company's financing strategy has been almost entirely equity-driven, but the most critical recent activity isn't a debt issuance; it's a strategic pivot. In a major move impacting their capital structure, Achilles Therapeutics plc (ACHL) announced in February 2025 its intention to voluntarily delist its American Depositary Shares (ADSs) from Nasdaq and deregister from the SEC. This action, coupled with a scheduled General Meeting in March 2025 to seek shareholder approval for a members' voluntary liquidation, fundamentally changes the context of their 'growth' financing.

The low debt and high cash balance, which was projected to support operations through the end of 2025 (around $95.1 million as of mid-2024), was intended to fund their clinical trials. The decision to liquidate, however, means the focus shifts from balancing debt and equity for growth to managing the remaining capital for an orderly wind-down and distribution to shareholders. This is a defintely a different kind of financial balancing act.

For a deeper dive into the company's long-term vision that preceded this shift, you can review their Mission Statement, Vision, & Core Values of Achilles Therapeutics plc (ACHL).

The table below summarizes the key financial metrics that illustrate their equity-heavy, low-leverage structure:

Metric Value (TTM / Latest Available 2025) Industry Benchmark (Biotechnology 2025)
Total Debt ~$3.62 million N/A
Debt-to-Equity Ratio 0.04 0.17
Cash & Equivalents ~$86.05 million N/A

Liquidity and Solvency

When you look at the raw numbers for Achilles Therapeutics plc (ACHL), the liquidity ratios look defintely strong, but those figures are a head-fake. The true liquidity picture is dominated by the company's strategic decision in early 2025 to pursue a members' voluntary liquidation, which means the company is winding down operations and returning capital to shareholders.

The high ratios reflect a company that was sitting on a significant cash reserve, but whose business model-developing T cell therapies-was unsustainable without further financing. The cash was not for growth; it was a runway that ultimately ended in March 2025 with the voluntary delisting from Nasdaq and the liquidation proposal.

Current and Quick Ratios: A Liquidity Illusion

The company's most recent quarter (MRQ) liquidity positions were excellent on paper, which is common for a clinical-stage biotech that has raised substantial capital and has minimal inventory. The current ratio and quick ratio (acid-test ratio) show a massive buffer of liquid assets over short-term liabilities.

Here's the quick math on the most recent reported ratios:

  • Current Ratio: 6.04 (MRQ)
  • Quick Ratio: 5.84 (MRQ)

A ratio of 1.0 is generally considered healthy, so a 6.04 current ratio is phenomenal. But in this context, it just means the company had $6.04 in current assets for every dollar of current liabilities. The quick ratio is nearly identical because the company has almost no inventory to exclude, a typical trait for a biopharma company. This strength, however, was a sign of capital preservation for a failing business model, not operational efficiency.

Working Capital and Cash Flow Trends

The working capital position was positive, driven by a substantial cash balance that was intended to support operations through 2025. As of September 30, 2024, the company's cash position was approximately $86.1 million, which provided the necessary working capital to cover short-term needs.

Still, the underlying trend in operating cash flow shows why the liquidation became necessary. The company was burning cash at a significant rate, a clear sign of negative working capital trends if not for the large cash reserves. The trailing twelve months (TTM) data ending in the most recent quarter of 2025 paints a clear picture of the cash drain:

Cash Flow Activity (TTM ending MRQ 2025) Amount (in USD) Trend
Operating Cash Flow -$63.26 million Significant Cash Burn
Investing Cash Flow (Capital Expenditures) -$805,000 Minimal Investment
Free Cash Flow -$64.07 million High Cash Outflow

The -$63.26 million in operating cash flow shows the true cost of running the business, which was not covered by revenue. This is the definition of a cash-intensive, pre-commercial biotech. The company's net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2024, was $48.25 million. You can see the cash burn was the central issue.

The Liquidity Concern: Strategic Pivot to Wind-Down

The biggest liquidity event in 2025 wasn't a cash crunch, but a planned wind-down. The company's financing activities in late 2024 and early 2025 were focused on maximizing the remaining cash for shareholders, not for continued operations. For example, the sale of the TRACERx license to AstraZeneca for $12,000,000 in December 2024 was a crucial cash inflow.

The ultimate liquidity strength is now defined by the estimated capital return to shareholders, which is projected to be approximately £1.20 to £1.32 per share or $1.50 to $1.66 per share. This is the final, concrete value of the company's remaining liquid assets after settling liabilities and winding-up costs. To truly understand the shareholder base that was impacted by this pivot, you should read Exploring Achilles Therapeutics plc (ACHL) Investor Profile: Who's Buying and Why?

The action for you, the investor, is to recognize that the company is now a distressed asset in the final stages of a controlled liquidation, and any investment decision should be based solely on the estimated net cash return per share, not on traditional liquidity ratios.

Valuation Analysis

You're looking at Achilles Therapeutics plc (ACHL) and trying to figure out if the market has it right. Is this clinical-stage biotech a steal, or is the valuation a warning sign? The short answer is that traditional metrics suggest it's undervalued, but the context of a clinical-stage company-and recent corporate actions-is defintely more critical than the raw numbers.

When we look at the core valuation ratios, Achilles Therapeutics plc presents a picture typical of a development-stage firm with no commercial product. Its Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratio is non-existent, or 'n/a,' which is expected since the company is not yet profitable, with an estimated Earnings Per Share (EPS) forecast for the next financial year (FY2025) sitting at a loss of -$0.18. This tells you nothing about its potential, only its current stage of operation.

However, the Price-to-Book (P/B) ratio offers a clearer signal of value relative to its assets. As of 2025 data, Achilles Therapeutics plc's P/B ratio is approximately 0.59. A P/B ratio below 1.0 suggests the stock is trading for less than the value of its net tangible assets (what's left if you sold everything and paid off all debt). This is often a sign of undervaluation, especially when you consider its strong cash position, which contributes to a negative Enterprise Value (EV) of around -$21.60 million. A negative EV means the company holds more cash than its market capitalization plus total debt, essentially implying you'd get a net cash surplus if you bought the entire company and paid off its debt.

Here's a quick snapshot of the key financial markers for Achilles Therapeutics plc:

  • Last Closing Stock Price (2025): $1.48
  • Price-to-Book (P/B) Ratio: 0.59
  • Enterprise Value (EV): Approximately -$21.60 million
  • Dividend Yield: 0.00% (No dividend paid)

The stock's momentum has been positive, still. Over the past 365 days, the share price has moved up by +14.73%, and it outperformed the S&P 500 Index by +5.96% over the past year. The 52-week price range for the stock has been between $0.92 and $1.51.

Analyst sentiment, however, is mixed but points to significant upside. While some consensus reports point to a 'Sell' rating, a more detailed look shows the average 12-month price target from analysts is around $4.00. That target suggests a massive potential upside of over +170.27% from the recent $1.48 price. The wide range of analyst opinions-from a low target of $2.00 to a high of $6.00-reflects the binary nature of clinical-stage biotech investing. The valuation is less about current earnings and more about the probability of success for their AI-powered precision T cell therapies. You need to weigh that upside against the very real risk that Achilles Therapeutics plc was delisted pending liquidation in March 2025. That changes the entire conversation from 'undervalued' to 'high-risk corporate action.' For a deeper dive into who is still holding shares, you should read Exploring Achilles Therapeutics plc (ACHL) Investor Profile: Who's Buying and Why?.

Here is a summary of the analyst views on Achilles Therapeutics plc:

Metric Value (2025 Data) Implication
Last Closing Price $1.48 Baseline for comparison.
Analyst Average Price Target $4.00 Implies +170.27% upside.
Analyst Consensus Mixed ('Buy' average, but also 'Sell' consensus) Reflects high-risk, high-reward profile.

The key takeaway is this: the low P/B and negative EV scream 'undervalued' on paper, but the delisting news and the reliance on clinical trial success for their CHIRON and THETIS product candidates mean the risk is exponentially higher than a typical value play. Your action should be to treat this less like a stock and more like a venture capital bet on a successful corporate restructuring or a last-minute clinical breakthrough.

Risk Factors

You need to understand that the primary risk for Achilles Therapeutics plc (ACHL) is no longer a clinical trial failure or market competition; it is the members' voluntary liquidation process that began in the first quarter of 2025. This is the ultimate risk, translating to a return of capital to shareholders rather than a path to commercialization. The Board determined this was the most efficient way to return value, given the discontinuation of their core programs.

The company announced the appointment of Joint Liquidators on March 20, 2025, with the plan to voluntarily delist from Nasdaq and deregister from the SEC. This move followed the September 2024 decision to discontinue their T-cell therapy program and close the Phase I/IIa CHIRON and THETIS clinical trials, as they hadn't met the goals for commercial viability. That's the hard truth: the strategic pivot failed to materialize into a viable path forward.

Here's the quick math on the financial risks that led to this decision:

  • High Cash Burn: Operating cash flow in the 12 months leading up to the liquidation announcement was a negative $63.26 million.
  • Clinical Failure: The discontinuation of the core clinical programs eliminated the company's primary value driver.
  • Minimal Revenue: Analysts were forecasting $0 in revenue for the quarterly earnings expected in April 2025, with an expected loss of -$0.37 per share.

This situation is a stark reminder of the binary nature of risk in clinical-stage biotechnology. You are no longer investing in a pipeline; you are betting on the net asset value per share after all liabilities are settled in the liquidation.

The main mitigation strategy was the pursuit of strategic alternatives to maximize value before liquidation. This resulted in a key asset sale: the transfer of the TRACERx license to AstraZeneca for a total cash consideration of $12,000,000 in December 2024. This cash injection, combined with the remaining cash balance of $95.1 million as of June 30, 2024, forms the pool for potential shareholder distribution. The liquidation itself is the final, definitive mitigation plan to return remaining capital to investors.

To be fair, the company's balance sheet was strong in terms of liquidity before the liquidation process began, with a Current Ratio of 6.04 and a Debt/Equity ratio of only 0.04. But in biotech, liquidity is just fuel; clinical success is the engine. When the engine stops, the fuel is just what's left for the refund.

You should focus your analysis now on the estimated return per share from the liquidation process, which is the only remaining financial opportunity. If you are interested in how other investors reacted to this news, you should check out Exploring Achilles Therapeutics plc (ACHL) Investor Profile: Who's Buying and Why?

Here is a summary of the transition from operational to liquidation risk:

Risk Category Pre-Liquidation (2024) Post-Liquidation (2025 Action)
Primary Risk Clinical Trial Failure (CHIRON/THETIS) Liquidation Proceeds/NAV per Share
Financial Metric Operating Cash Flow: -$63.26M Asset Sale: $12,000,000 (AstraZeneca)
Mitigation Strategy Refocusing on new modalities/partnerships Members' Voluntary Liquidation (March 20, 2025)

Your next step is to find the latest estimte of the net asset value per share provided by the liquidators or a trusted analyst. That is the only number that matters now.

Growth Opportunities

You need to be a realist here: Achilles Therapeutics plc (ACHL) is not pursuing traditional biopharma growth. The company is in a process of strategic wind-down, which means the focus for investors shifts entirely from future revenue growth to value realization from the remaining assets. The near-term opportunity is about the final distribution of cash, not product sales.

In September 2024, Achilles Therapeutics plc announced a major strategic pivot, discontinuing its T-cell receptor (TCR) T-cell therapy program, including the Phase I/IIa CHIRON and THETIS clinical trials, because they didn't meet the bar for commercial viability. This led directly to the company exploring value-maximizing strategies and ultimately, a plan for dissolution.

The most significant near-term financial event was the sale of key technology assets. In December 2024, the company transferred the commercial license for data and samples from the TRACERx study and its Material Acquisition Platform (MAP) to AstraZeneca for a total cash consideration of $12 million. This transaction essentially concluded the strategic review.

  • Primary Value Driver: Realization of cash on hand for shareholders.
  • 2025 Revenue Projection: Analyst consensus for the quarter ending March 2025 projected a revenue of $0.
  • 2025 Earnings Estimate: The consensus earnings per share (EPS) forecast for the same period was a loss of -$0.37.

Here's the quick math on the financial position: As of a recent date (March 20, 2025, in the TTM calculation), the company's net cash position was approximately $82.43 million, calculated from $86.05 million in cash and equivalents minus $3.62 million in debt. This figure is the core asset now, representing roughly $2.01 per share for the 41.10 million shares outstanding, though the final liquidation value will be lower after wind-down costs.

To be fair, the company's competitive advantage was always its proprietary PELEUS™ bioinformatics platform and the exclusive commercial rights to the landmark TRACERx data, which allowed for the identification of clonal neoantigens (unique cancer mutations). But the sale of the TRACERx license to AstraZeneca means that core asset is gone. The company is now focused on the formal liquidation process, with a General Meeting scheduled for March 20, 2025, to approve the voluntary liquidation of its UK subsidiaries and dissolution of its U.S. subsidiary.

Your next step should be to monitor the formal liquidation announcements for the definitive cash distribution per share. You can learn more about the institutional holders who were tracking this situation in Exploring Achilles Therapeutics plc (ACHL) Investor Profile: Who's Buying and Why?

DCF model

Achilles Therapeutics plc (ACHL) DCF Excel Template

    5-Year Financial Model

    40+ Charts & Metrics

    DCF & Multiple Valuation

    Free Email Support


Disclaimer

All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.

We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site—including articles or product references—constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.

All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.