Emerson Radio Corp. (MSN) Bundle
You're looking at Emerson Radio Corp. (MSN) and probably wondering how a legacy brand with a market capitalization of just over $9.57 million in late 2025 manages to stay afloat, and honestly, the financial picture is more about intellectual property than clock radios. The headline numbers for the fiscal year 2025, which ended March 31, tell a story of transition, not growth: the company reported total Revenue of only $10.79 million, which translated into a Net Loss of $4.73 million, or a loss of $0.22 per share. This kind of operating loss would sink most small companies, but here's the defintely critical context: MSN maintains a remarkably clean balance sheet, reporting Cash and Short-Term Investments of approximately $16.05 million as of March 31, 2025, and a near-zero debt-to-equity ratio of just 0.02. So, while the core product sales are struggling-recent quarterly revenue dropped to $1.22 million due to discontinued lines-the company's real value is in its cash cushion and its licensing model, which is a unique risk/reward profile you need to understand before making any move.
Revenue Analysis
If you are looking at Emerson Radio Corp. (MSN), the first thing to understand is that the recent revenue picture is a mixed bag: strong annual growth for the last fiscal year, but a sharp drop in the most recent quarter. For the fiscal year ending March 31, 2025, Emerson Radio Corp. reported annual revenue of $10.79 million, which was an impressive 18.91% increase year-over-year. That kind of growth is defintely a signal, but the near-term trend is what keeps me up at night.
The core of Emerson Radio Corp.'s business model is straightforward, but it's not diversified. The company operates as a single business unit, meaning management doesn't break down resource allocation by separate segments. Still, we can clearly see the two primary revenue streams: product sales and licensing. Product sales are the overwhelming driver, and they are also the source of the recent volatility.
Here's the quick math on the revenue streams from the first quarter of fiscal year 2026 (Q2 2025 ended June 30, 2025), which shows the concentration risk clearly:
- Net Product Sales: $1.6 million
- Licensing Revenue: $86,000
Net product sales accounted for roughly 94% of that quarter's revenue. Licensing, which is a higher-margin stream based on the value of the Emerson brand, only contributed about 5%. If you want to dig into the value of that brand, you should read their Mission Statement, Vision, & Core Values of Emerson Radio Corp. (MSN).
The big shift in the near-term is the revenue decline in the latest reported quarter (Q2 FY2026, ended September 30, 2025). Revenue fell to $1.22 million from $2.74 million a year ago, a significant drop. This wasn't a broad market issue; it was a specific product and customer problem. The company cited the discontinuation of a Walmart clock radio product and ongoing tariff pressure on microwaves as the primary drivers.
This highlights a critical risk: customer and product concentration. For that same period, the three largest customers accounted for approximately 65% of net revenues. Amazon.com alone comprised 56% of quarterly net revenues over 10% customers in a prior quarter, showing how much a single relationship matters. The reliance on a few key products, notably microwave oven sales, is substantial, so any disruption there hits the top line hard.
To be fair, the company has shown a historical ability to grow product sales, like the increase in net product sales to $3.9 million in Q3 FY2025, driven by newly introduced houseware products. Still, the current trend is a red flag.
Here is a snapshot of the recent revenue performance and its composition:
| Metric | FY 2025 (Annual) | Q2 FY2026 (Ended Sep 30, 2025) |
| Total Revenue | $10.79 million | $1.22 million |
| Year-over-Year Growth | 18.91% | -55.5% (Approx. vs. $2.74M prior year) |
| Primary Revenue Source | Product Sales (Over 90%) | Product Sales ($1.6 million) |
| Secondary Revenue Source | Licensing | Licensing ($86,000) |
What this table hides is the immediate action required: you need to track the next quarter's product sales closely to see if the company can offset the loss of the Walmart product and mitigate the tariff effects.
Profitability Metrics
You're looking for a clear picture of Emerson Radio Corp. (MSN)'s financial engine, not just the glossy revenue figures. The direct takeaway is this: Emerson Radio Corp. is profoundly unprofitable, with its core business struggling to generate a positive gross margin, let alone an operating profit. This isn't a growth story; it's a capital preservation challenge.
For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2025 (FY 2025), the company reported a net loss of $4.73 million on revenue of $10.79 million. Here's the quick math on their core profitability ratios, which are critical for understanding how efficiently they turn sales into profit at different stages:
- Gross Profit Margin: 8.35%
- Operating Profit Margin: -52.06%
- Net Profit Margin: -43.87%
A negative operating margin of -52.06% means that for every dollar of sales, the company is losing over fifty cents just from its core operations. That's a defintely unsustainable position.
Gross Profit and Operational Efficiency
The gross profit margin-what's left after the cost of goods sold (COGS)-is the first place to look for operational health. Emerson Radio Corp.'s FY 2025 Gross Profit Margin of 8.35% is shockingly low, especially when compared to the broader Consumer Electronics industry average of roughly 37.9% as of November 2025. This gap tells you their product sourcing, pricing, or product mix is fundamentally broken.
This trend worsened dramatically in the near-term. In the second quarter of fiscal year 2026 (ended September 30, 2025), the gross margin was reported as 'near-zero,' with cost of sales of approximately $1.216 million against revenue of $1.215 million. This near-zero performance was driven by factors like the discontinuation of a high-volume product and tariff pressure on microwaves. The only bright spot in operational efficiency is that cost controls did help reduce Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses to $1.195 million in that quarter, but that effort is completely overshadowed by the inability to make money on the product itself.
Profitability Trends and Industry Comparison
The trend in profitability is one of deep, sustained losses. The company's business model, which centers on brand licensing and outsourcing production to maintain a lean structure, is clearly not translating into bottom-line success. While the Net Profit Margin for the Consumer Electronics industry is also negative at an average of -3.9%, Emerson Radio Corp.'s -43.87% is an order of magnitude worse. This isn't just a tough industry; it's a company-specific crisis of profitability.
Here is a comparison of Emerson Radio Corp.'s FY 2025 margins against the industry benchmark:
| Profitability Metric | Emerson Radio Corp. (FY 2025) | Consumer Electronics Industry Average (Nov 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | 8.35% | 37.9% |
| Net Profit Margin | -43.87% | -3.9% |
The company's ability to generate profit is severely compromised. Investors need to see a clear path to a positive gross margin before even considering the operating expenses. You can read more about the company's long-term strategy here: Mission Statement, Vision, & Core Values of Emerson Radio Corp. (MSN).
Debt vs. Equity Structure
When you look at Emerson Radio Corp. (MSN)'s balance sheet for the 2025 fiscal year, the direct takeaway is its extreme conservatism: the company is virtually debt-free. This puts them in a unique, low-risk position compared to their peers, but it also raises questions about their growth strategy.
The company's debt levels are negligible, which is highly unusual for a publicly traded consumer electronics firm. As of the most recent data, Emerson Radio Corp. (MSN) reports a total debt of only $426,000. This figure is so low that long-term debt is essentially zero on the books. Here's the quick math on their liquidity: with over $15.54 million in cash and equivalents, their net cash position stands at a robust $15.11 million.
This minimal leverage translates into a startlingly low debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio. The D/E ratio measures how much debt a company uses to finance its assets relative to the value of shareholders' equity (currently around $20.35 million).
- Emerson Radio Corp. (MSN) D/E Ratio: 0.02
- Consumer Electronics Industry Average D/E Ratio: Approximately 0.50
A ratio of 0.02 means that for every dollar of equity, the company has only two cents of debt. To be fair, a D/E ratio of 0.50 is generally considered healthy for the consumer electronics industry, but MSN is operating at a level that signals almost no reliance on external creditors. This is a very safe balance sheet.
The company's financing balance is heavily skewed toward equity funding, or more accurately, funding through its own cash reserves and retained earnings. Because debt is so minimal, there is no recent activity to report on major debt issuances, credit ratings, or refinancing efforts-they simply don't need it. They use their cash and equity to manage operations, which is a key factor to consider as you are Exploring Emerson Radio Corp. (MSN) Investor Profile: Who's Buying and Why?
What this estimate hides, however, is the trade-off. While a low D/E ratio minimizes financial risk and interest expense, it can also suggest that management is not utilizing debt strategically to accelerate growth or increase its return on equity (ROE) through financial leverage. The company has essentially chosen safety over aggressive expansion. You need to weigh that stability against the potential for missed opportunities in a fast-moving market.
| Metric | Value (FY 2025/Q2 FY2026) | Industry Context |
|---|---|---|
| Total Debt | $426,000 | Extremely low, nearly debt-free. |
| Total Equity (Book Value) | $20.35 million | The primary source of financing. |
| Net Cash Position | $15.11 million | Significant liquidity for a company of this size. |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio | 0.02 | Well below the industry average of 0.50. |
The company's approach is defintely a relic of a different era, prioritizing cash preservation above all else. This means their financial health is strong from a solvency standpoint, but investors should look for signs of how this large cash hoard and minimal leverage will be deployed to generate better returns.
Liquidity and Solvency
You need to know if Emerson Radio Corp. (MSN) can cover its near-term obligations, and the answer is a resounding yes, though the source of that liquidity is a key point. The company's balance sheet for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2025, shows exceptionally strong liquidity, driven by a large reserve of cash and short-term investments, not core operational revenue.
The core issue isn't a lack of cash, but a lack of profitable operations. Honestly, the liquidity is a fortress built on past assets, not current sales. This is a critical distinction for any investor looking at Breaking Down Emerson Radio Corp. (MSN) Financial Health: Key Insights for Investors.
Current and Quick Ratios: A Liquidity Fortress
Emerson Radio Corp.'s liquidity ratios for the 2025 fiscal year (FY2025) are extraordinarily high, indicating that the company has far more current assets than current liabilities. The Current Ratio for FY2025 stood at approximately 13.33, which is calculated from total current assets of $22.79 million against total current liabilities of $1.71 million.
Here's the quick math for the Quick Ratio (Acid-Test Ratio), which excludes inventory and prepaid expenses: Quick Assets (Cash, Short-Term Investments, and Receivables) totaled about $17.60 million (Cash of $1.19M + Short-Term Investments of $14.87M + Receivables of $1.54M). Divided by the $1.71 million in current liabilities, the Quick Ratio is roughly 10.30. This means Emerson Radio Corp. could cover its immediate debts more than ten times over without selling a single piece of inventory. That's defintely a strength, but it also signals a business that is holding assets rather than actively deploying them for growth.
- Current Ratio (FY2025): 13.33 (Extremely high liquidity)
- Quick Ratio (FY2025): 10.30 (Strongest indicator of immediate solvency)
Working Capital and Cash Flow Trends
The company's working capital-the capital available for day-to-day operations-was approximately $21.08 million at the end of FY2025. This is a substantial buffer. However, the trend in working capital has been declining from previous years, and the bulk of this capital is held in Short-Term Investments ($14.87 million), not operational cash flow.
Looking at the cash flow statements is where the picture gets complicated. For the trailing twelve months (TTM) ended recently, the cash flow from operating activities was a negative $3.32 million. This negative operating cash flow is a major concern, as it means the core business is burning cash, not generating it. The net loss for the six months ended September 30, 2025 (Q2 FY2026), was $2.183 million, which reinforces the negative operational trend.
The cash flow statement overview for the six months ended September 30, 2025, shows a business in contraction:
| Cash Flow Activity (Six Months Ended Sept 30, 2025) | Trend/Status |
|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | Negative (TTM: -$3.32M) |
| Investing Cash Flow | Likely minimal/stable (Free Cash Flow TTM: -$3.34M) |
| Financing Cash Flow | Minimal debt/equity changes (Debt/Equity Ratio: 0.02) |
Liquidity Strengths and Concerns
The primary strength is the sheer volume of liquid assets, mostly in short-term, marketable securities, which makes any immediate solvency crisis highly unlikely. The company has a massive safety net. But the risk is clear: the operational cash burn of over $3 million annually means the company is slowly drawing down its asset base to fund its losses. The current liquidity is a historical advantage, not a sustainable operational one. Your next step should be to monitor the Q3 FY2026 operating cash flow to see if cost controls mentioned in the latest report have started to reverse this negative trend.
Valuation Analysis
You're looking at Emerson Radio Corp. (MSN) and asking the core question: Is this stock a bargain or a value trap? The short answer is that the company appears undervalued based on its assets, but its negative earnings and high volatility signal significant operational risk. It's a classic net-net scenario, where the market is pricing the company below its book value, but the business model itself is struggling.
When you look at the fundamental valuation multiples for the 2025 fiscal year, the picture is complex. Emerson Radio Corp. (MSN) reported a loss of $0.23 per share for the full year 2025, which immediately makes the Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratio irrelevant for comparison. The P/E ratio is currently a negative -1.97, which simply tells us the company is losing money. You can't compare a negative to a positive, so that metric is a wash.
The more compelling valuation signal is the Price-to-Book (P/B) ratio, which sits at approximately 0.53 as of late 2025. Here's the quick math: a P/B of 0.53 means the stock is trading for just 53 cents for every dollar of its net assets (Book Value). This is a strong indicator of being undervalued from an asset perspective. Still, the Enterprise Value-to-EBITDA (EV/EBITDA) ratio is also negative, at around -1.41, which is another red flag, confirming the operational challenges-the company's core business is not generating positive earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) of $-4.64M for the fiscal year 2025.
The market is defintely nervous about this name, and the stock price action over the last 12 months shows why.
Stock Performance and Analyst Sentiment
The stock has been a wild ride, which is typical for a micro-cap with a low float. Over the last 52 weeks, the price of Emerson Radio Corp. (MSN) has fluctuated dramatically, ranging from a low of $0.2802 to a high of $0.8499. As of November 2025, the stock is trading around $0.45, representing a 52-week price change of approximately -5.31%. This volatility is a major risk factor you need to price into your model.
When we look at the capital return side, there's no help for income investors. Emerson Radio Corp. (MSN) does not pay a dividend, so the dividend yield and payout ratio are both 0.00%. This means you are relying entirely on capital appreciation, which is a tough bet given the recent performance.
Analyst consensus is not providing a clear 'Buy' signal either. The overall technical and forecast sentiment is generally Bearish or a general Sell signal in the short term, with some models forecasting the average price for 2025 to be around $0.4401. Insider sentiment is 'Neutral,' which is not exactly a vote of confidence. The market is waiting for a clear operational turnaround or a strategic move to unlock the underlying asset value.
Here are the key valuation takeaways for Emerson Radio Corp. (MSN):
- P/B Ratio of 0.53 suggests the company is trading at a significant discount to its net assets.
- Negative P/E and EV/EBITDA ratios confirm a lack of core operating profitability.
- The 52-week price range of $0.2802 to $0.8499 highlights extreme price volatility.
- No dividend means no income cushion for investors.
For a deeper dive into the operational side and balance sheet health, which is critical for a company trading below book value, you should check out the full analysis: Breaking Down Emerson Radio Corp. (MSN) Financial Health: Key Insights for Investors.
Risk Factors
You need to see the risks clearly, because Emerson Radio Corp. (MSN) is facing a critical inflection point right now, driven by sharp revenue declines and a near-zero gross margin in the first half of fiscal year 2026. The biggest immediate threat is a massive customer concentration risk, plus the ongoing struggle to maintain profitability in its core product lines.
The company's financial health, while supported by a decent balance sheet with approximately $18.9 million in working capital as of September 30, 2025, is being eroded by operational losses. The net loss for the six months ended September 30, 2025, was $2.183 million, a worsening from the $1.843 million loss a year prior. This is a tough spot to be in.
Here's the quick math: Q2 FY2026 net revenues were only $1.215 million, but the cost of sales was about $1.216 million. That's a negative gross margin, meaning the company is losing money just by selling its goods.
Operational and Strategic Risks
The most immediate and material risks are tied directly to the company's revenue streams and supply chain. You can't ignore the fact that the consumer electronics industry is defintely brutal.
- Customer Concentration: This is a huge strategic vulnerability. In the second quarter of fiscal year 2026, a single retailer, Amazon, accounted for a staggering 56% of Emerson Radio Corp.'s net revenues. Losing or even seeing a significant reduction in orders from Amazon would immediately cripple the top line.
- Product Discontinuation: The sharp year-over-year revenue drop in Q2 FY2026 (from $2.738 million to $1.215 million) was primarily caused by the discontinuation of a specific clock radio product at Walmart. This highlights a reliance on single-SKU (Stock Keeping Unit) success at major retailers.
- Near-Zero Product Margin: As mentioned, the product sales are barely covering their own cost, which means the company's entire profit engine relies heavily on its trademark-licensing business to offset the losses from physical goods.
For a deeper dive into the long-term strategic direction that aims to mitigate some of these product-line risks, you should review the Mission Statement, Vision, & Core Values of Emerson Radio Corp. (MSN).
External and Financial Headwinds
Beyond the internal operational issues, Emerson Radio Corp. (MSN) is exposed to macro-level risks common in the global manufacturing and retail sector. These factors are often cited in the company's SEC filings, like the 10-K and 10-Q reports.
- Tariff and Global Conflict Pressure: The company specifically noted that tariff pressure on products like microwaves contributed to the revenue decline. Plus, the broader global conflicts, like the Russia-Ukraine conflict, and general inflation impact supply chain costs and consumer demand.
- Competitive and Technological Factors: The consumer electronics space is hyper-competitive. Emerson Radio Corp.'s classic brand competes against much larger, more technologically advanced firms, making it difficult to maintain market share and pricing power.
- Market Conditions: General economic and currency conditions, market demand shifts, and pricing pressure are constant external risks that directly impact the company's thin margins.
To combat the financial bleed, management has focused on cost controls, which is the clear mitigation strategy. This helped reduce Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses to $1.195 million in Q2 FY2026. This is essential, but it can only go so far when the gross margin is flat or negative.
The core issue is that the company is currently burning cash from operations, but its strong balance sheet-specifically the $12.545 million in short-term investments-provides a crucial buffer, or 'cash runway,' to execute a turnaround or strategic shift.
Growth Opportunities
You need to look past the small size and focus on the strategic model, but honestly, the near-term financial picture for Emerson Radio Corp. (MSN) is mixed. The company finished its fiscal year 2025 strong, reporting annual revenue of $10.79 million, which was an 18.91% increase year-over-year, but the latest quarterly results show a clear headwind.
The core of Emerson Radio Corp.'s future lies in its capital-light operating model-brand licensing and private-label manufacturing-which keeps its cost structure lean. This approach lets them adapt fast. They don't own factories; they use strategic partnerships with Original Design Manufacturers (ODMs) to handle production, so they can pivot product lines quickly based on consumer trends.
Here's the quick math on the recent slowdown: for the second quarter ended September 30, 2025, revenue was only $1.22 million, a sharp drop from $2.74 million in the same quarter a year ago. Plus, the net loss widened to $1.04 million, up from $0.881 million. What this estimate hides is the challenge of maintaining growth momentum in the highly competitive consumer electronics market, especially when relying on licensing revenue.
Future growth hinges on a few key actions:
- Product Innovation: Continuously releasing new products under legacy brand names in home entertainment and digital health.
- Market Expansion: Driving sales through a dual focus on traditional physical retail and digital marketplace growth across North America.
- Operational Efficiency: Maintaining a lean, outsourced production model to keep product pricing competitive against larger rivals.
To be fair, analyst consensus estimates for future revenue and earnings are generally not available for Emerson Radio Corp., which is common for smaller micro-cap companies, so we must rely on the company's reported financials and strategy. The competitive advantage is their brand equity and low operational overhead, allowing them to target value-oriented retailers effectively. Still, the recent revenue decline is a defintely a risk you need to monitor closely. For a deeper dive into the company's financial structure, you can read more at Breaking Down Emerson Radio Corp. (MSN) Financial Health: Key Insights for Investors.
The table below summarizes the critical financial data for your immediate review:
| Metric | Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2025 | Q2 2025 (Ended Sep 30, 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Annual Revenue | $10.79 million | N/A |
| Annual Revenue Growth | 18.91% | N/A |
| Quarterly Revenue | N/A | $1.22 million |
| Quarterly Net Loss | N/A | $1.04 million |

Emerson Radio Corp. (MSN) DCF Excel Template
5-Year Financial Model
40+ Charts & Metrics
DCF & Multiple Valuation
Free Email Support
Disclaimer
All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.
We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site—including articles or product references—constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.
All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.