Exploring Traeger, Inc. (COOK) Investor Profile: Who’s Buying and Why?

Exploring Traeger, Inc. (COOK) Investor Profile: Who’s Buying and Why?

US | Consumer Cyclical | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | NYSE

Traeger, Inc. (COOK) Bundle

Get Full Bundle:
$12 $7
$12 $7
$12 $7
$12 $7
$25 $15
$12 $7
$12 $7
$12 $7
$12 $7

TOTAL:

You're looking at Traeger, Inc. (COOK) and scratching your head, right? Honestly, when you see a Q3 2025 GAAP net loss of $89.8 million-largely driven by a massive $74.7 million goodwill impairment-it's natural to wonder who's still buying this stock. But the seasoned money managers are looking past that number and betting on the operational turnaround, a classic value-play strategy, so we need to know who's in and why they're holding over 56.5 million shares. The institutional profile shows major players like JPMorgan Chase & Co. and BlackRock, Inc. are still significant holders, with some, like JPMorgan Chase & Co., dramatically boosting their position by over 9,116% in a recent filing period, suggesting a deep conviction in the future. Their thesis hinges on the underlying business health: the consumables segment, the high-margin wood pellets, grew a solid 12.3% to $25.3 million in Q3, plus the company's Project Gravity aims for $50 million in total annualized cost savings, which is what drove the Adjusted EBITDA up 11.8% to $13.8 million. Are these institutions seeing a deep-value opportunity at a stock price near $0.81 per share, or is this a classic case of catching a falling knife? Let's break down the owners and the real financial drivers.

Who Invests in Traeger, Inc. (COOK) and Why?

You're looking at Traeger, Inc. (COOK) and wondering who's actually buying in, especially with the stock's volatility. The quick takeaway is that Traeger's investor base is a mix of influential private equity and large institutions, but it also has a significant retail following-a structure that often signals a turnaround story or a deep value play.

Key Investor Types: The Ownership Breakdown

The ownership structure of Traeger, Inc. is top-heavy and complex, dominated by a few large, long-term holders and a substantial institutional presence. As of late 2025, institutions-like mutual funds and pension funds-hold a significant stake, typically ranging from 32.53% to around 36% of the company's shares. This is a respectable level of institutional backing, but the real power lies with the pre-IPO private equity investors and insiders.

Private equity firm AEA Investors LP, for example, is one of the largest shareholders, holding approximately 24.46% of the shares. Plus, when you factor in other large, long-term holders like Ontario Teachers Pension Plan Board, which holds about 18.02% of shares, you see that a small group controls a majority of the stock. The top three shareholders alone own roughly 50% of the company, giving them huge influence over corporate strategy.

Retail investors-the general public-hold a sizable, though less concentrated, portion, with estimates suggesting their ownership is between 24% and over 50% of the outstanding shares. That's a lot of individual conviction. The big money has a seat at the table, but the retail crowd can defintely move the stock on sentiment.

  • Institutions: Around 36% (e.g., Vanguard, BlackRock, JPMorgan Chase & Co.).
  • Private Equity/Insiders: Around 41% (e.g., AEA Investors LP, Jeremy Andrus).
  • Retail Investors: The remaining significant float.

Investment Motivations: The Turnaround Thesis

Investors are primarily attracted to Traeger, Inc. (COOK) as a deep value or turnaround play, not a high-growth stock right now. The company is the category creator for wood pellet grills, and that strong brand position is the core asset. The investment thesis centers on the idea that the market is undervaluing that brand and its dedicated customer base.

The near-term focus is on profitability. In 2025, Traeger announced a decisive strategic initiative, including a workforce reduction and organizational restructuring, aimed at boosting profitability and enhancing cash flow by the close of the fiscal year. This is a clear signal to investors that management is prioritizing margin over pure top-line growth.

Here's the quick math on the value proposition: Wall Street analysts have set an average one-year price target of $2.09 for Traeger, Inc. (COOK). More aggressively, the projected GuruFocus fair value (GF Value) is estimated at $2.54, suggesting a potential upside of over 63% from a recent trading price of $1.55. The market is betting on the company's ability to execute on its cost-cutting plan.

The company also shows product strength in its core business. In Q1 2025, the grills segment revenue surged by 12.8% to $86.7 million, driven by the successful Woodridge series launch, even as total revenue dipped slightly. This shows the innovation engine is still working. You can see their long-term vision in the Mission Statement, Vision, & Core Values of Traeger, Inc. (COOK).

Investment Strategies: Value, Passive, and Activist

The strategies employed by Traeger, Inc.'s diverse investor base reflect the stock's risk/reward profile. The largest holders, like the private equity and pension funds, are essentially long-term, activist investors. They aren't looking for a quick trade; they want to realize the company's full intrinsic value, often by influencing major corporate decisions to improve operational performance and eventually sell their stake at a much higher price.

For large institutional asset managers like The Vanguard Group, Inc. and BlackRock, Inc., their holdings are largely passive. They buy Traeger, Inc. (COOK) because it is a component of various index funds (like the Russell 2000). Their goal is to match the index's performance, so their buying and selling is systematic, not based on a unique view of the company's fundamentals.

The individual investors and smaller funds, however, are often engaged in a classic value investing strategy. They are buying a brand leader at a discounted price-to-sales (P/S) ratio, anticipating that the 2025 restructuring will lead to positive earnings per share (EPS), which analysts expect to be around -$0.12 for the full fiscal year 2025, a significant improvement from the Q3 2025 EPS of -$0.17. They are betting on the turnaround. The value play is clear: buy low, wait for the operational fix.

Investor Type Primary Strategy Motivation (2025 Focus)
Private Equity (AEA Investors LP) Long-Term/Activist Realizing intrinsic value via operational improvements and eventual exit.
Index Funds (Vanguard, BlackRock) Passive/Systematic Tracking the performance of underlying indices (e.g., Russell 2000).
Value/Hedge Funds Value Investing/Turnaround Betting on the success of the 2025 cost-cutting plan and the brand's resilience.

Next step: Review Traeger, Inc.'s Q4 2025 guidance when released to confirm the cash flow improvement trajectory.

Institutional Ownership and Major Shareholders of Traeger, Inc. (COOK)

You want to know who is buying Traeger, Inc. (COOK) and why, especially after a challenging period. The short answer is: big money is still a major player, and their recent moves suggest a belief in the company's strategic pivot, despite near-term volatility. As of the end of the third fiscal quarter of 2025, institutional investors-the mutual funds, pension funds, and asset managers-hold a significant stake, with some sources indicating institutional ownership is as high as 71.55% of the company's stock, totaling approximately 56,559,549 shares.

This level of ownership means the stock's price action and long-term strategy are defintely tied to the conviction of these large, sophisticated players. When you see a stock trading near its 12-month low, as Traeger's was around $0.81 per share in November 2025, the actions of these institutions are a critical signal.

Top Institutional Investors and Their Stakes

Looking at the most recent 13F filings from the third quarter of 2025, a few names stand out. These aren't just passive index funds; they include major asset managers and a significant pension plan, which often take a longer view. Here's a snapshot of the largest institutional owners:

Major Institutional Shareholder Shares Held (Q3 2025) Value (Approximate) % of Company
Ontario Teachers Pension Plan Board 24,693,075 $22.42M - $24.45M 18.02%
Capital World Investors 5,579,106 N/A 4.07%
Vanguard Group Inc. 3,291,830 $2.99M 2.40%
BlackRock, Inc. 2,581,141 $2.34M 1.88%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. 2,368,133 $2.15M - $2.89M 1.73%

The Ontario Teachers Pension Plan Board is the clear anchor here, holding a massive stake. This is a crucial point because pension funds typically look for stability and long-term value, not quick flips. The presence of Vanguard and BlackRock, Inc. is common, as they manage massive index funds that must hold shares proportional to the company's market capitalization.

Recent Shifts: Who's Buying and Selling?

The real story isn't just who holds the shares, but who is moving money right now. The third quarter of fiscal year 2025 saw a remarkable accumulation of shares by certain institutions, even as others trimmed their positions. This tells you the smart money is split on the near-term outlook, but some are making a huge bet on the turnaround.

  • JPMorgan Chase & Co. was the most aggressive buyer, increasing its stake by an astounding 9,116.3% in Q3 2025, adding 2,342,438 shares. That's a massive conviction trade.
  • Drive Wealth Management LLC also showed strong buying, raising its position by 107.4% during the third quarter.
  • Bridgeway Capital Management LLC increased its position by a modest 2.5% in the second quarter, a sign of continued, measured support.
  • On the other side, firms like Vanguard Group Inc. and BlackRock, Inc. saw minor decreases in their holdings, which is often just portfolio rebalancing, not a fundamental change in view.

When you see a major financial institution like JPMorgan Chase & Co. jump in with that kind of capital, it suggests they see a deep discount and believe the stock has bottomed out. They are buying into the Mission Statement, Vision, & Core Values of Traeger, Inc. (COOK). and the strategic plan to execute it.

The Institutional Impact on Strategy and Stock

What role do these investors play? They are the ultimate backstop. Their collective buying power stabilized the stock even after Traeger missed its Q3 2025 earnings per share (EPS) estimate, reporting ($0.17) versus a forecast of ($0.03). The stock price actually rose 11.48% after the earnings release, which is a clear sign that the market-specifically, these large investors-focused on the strategic narrative over the immediate loss.

The institutional focus is clearly on the company's cost-saving initiative, 'Project Gravity.' This program aims to deliver significant savings, and the company is projecting full-year fiscal 2025 revenue between $540 million and $555 million and adjusted EBITDA between $66 million and $73 million. The buyers are signaling that they believe management can hit these profitability targets by cutting costs and driving growth in higher-margin consumables, even while grill sales face a high single-digit decline for the year. Here's the quick math: they are willing to overlook a tough consumer environment and a revenue decline because they believe the structural profitability improvements will pay off in 2026 and beyond.

Key Investors and Their Impact on Traeger, Inc. (COOK)

If you're looking at Traeger, Inc. (COOK), the first thing you need to understand is that the ownership structure is not dominated by passive index funds; it's heavily influenced by a few major players. The stock is currently about 46.84% institutionally owned, but the real power sits with a tight group of three major shareholders who collectively control roughly 50% of the company.

This means a handful of entities and one key insider have a huge say in the company's direction, which is critical for a business navigating the current macroeconomic headwinds, like the tariff-related costs that management is working to mitigate. You can read more about the company's foundational history and ownership structure here: Traeger, Inc. (COOK): History, Ownership, Mission, How It Works & Makes Money.

The Power Trio: Private Equity, Pension Funds, and the CEO

The investor profile for Traeger, Inc. is unusual because the top owners are not your typical mutual fund giants. The largest shareholder is AEA Investors LP, a private equity firm, which holds a massive 24.46% stake, equating to 33,519,063 shares. This kind of private equity presence suggests a focus on operational efficiency and a defined exit strategy down the road, which often means aggressive cost-cutting and strategic shifts to boost the valuation.

The second largest owner is the Ontario Teachers Pension Plan Board, holding 18.02% or 24,693,075 shares as of Q3 2025. Pension funds like this are long-term, value-oriented investors. They want stability and a clear path to sustained profitability, so their influence is generally supportive of management's multi-year strategic plans, like the 'Project Gravity' initiative. The third key player is CEO and Chairman Jeremy Andrus, an insider who holds a significant 15.81% of the company, owning 21,657,447 shares. His large personal stake aligns his interests defintely with long-term shareholder value, which is a good sign for you as an investor.

  • AEA Investors LP: Drives for operational efficiency.
  • Ontario Teachers Pension Plan Board: Seeks long-term, stable returns.
  • Jeremy Andrus: Personal stake aligns insider and shareholder goals.

Institutional Shifts and the Influence of Large Holders

Beyond the top three, the institutional landscape shows some interesting movement in the 2025 fiscal year. Firms like Vanguard Group Inc and BlackRock, Inc. are major holders, with Vanguard holding 3,291,830 shares and BlackRock, Inc. holding 2,611,799 shares as of mid-2025. Their sheer size means their buying and selling activity can move the stock price. The overall trend for the last 12 months shows more institutional buying than selling, with 35 institutional buyers versus 16 institutional sellers, resulting in an inflow of $9.17M against $2.76M in outflows.

Here's the quick math on recent major institutional moves as of the Q3 2025 filings:

Investor Name Q3 2025 Shares Held (Approx.) Notable Recent Move (2025) Shares Change (Q2/Q3 2025)
JPMorgan Chase & Co. 2,368,133 Significant Increase +2,342,438
Capital World Investors 5,579,106 Significant Decrease -920,554
Vanguard Group Inc 3,291,830 Minor Decrease -7,575

JPMorgan Chase & Co.'s massive increase of over 2.3 million shares as of September 30, 2025, is a clear vote of confidence, especially right after the company announced its Project Gravity plan to achieve a total annualized cost savings target of $50 million. Conversely, Capital World Investors cutting nearly a million shares suggests they are taking profits or reallocating capital due to the volatility and the Q3 2025 net loss of $89.8 million (which included a large goodwill impairment). You need to pay attention to these large shifts; they signal what the smart money thinks about the company's near-term execution risk.

Insider Action: A Strong Signal

The most concrete action comes from CEO Jeremy Andrus. He was a significant buyer of his own company's stock in June 2025, purchasing over 730,000 shares across four separate transactions. Insider buying, especially from the CEO, is a powerful signal that the person closest to the business believes the stock is undervalued and that the strategic pivot-like the Project Gravity streamlining-will pay off. This move is a tangible commitment to the company's financial guidance for the full fiscal year 2025, which projects total revenue between $540 million and $555 million and Adjusted EBITDA between $66 million and $73 million.

When the person running the show puts their own cash on the line, that's better than any analyst recommendation.

Market Impact and Investor Sentiment

You're looking at Traeger, Inc. (COOK) and seeing a stock that's been beaten down, and you're right to question who's still buying. The overall investor sentiment is defintely leaning toward a 'Reduce' or 'Hold,' reflecting a deep sense of caution in the market, but there's a strong, contrarian signal coming from the company's own leadership.

The technical sentiment is overwhelmingly bearish, with a recent check showing 26 bearish signals against zero bullish ones, and the Fear & Greed Index sitting in the 'Fear' territory. This pessimism stems from the company's ongoing profitability challenges and macroeconomic headwinds hitting discretionary spending. Still, a significant 46.84% of the stock is held by institutional investors, suggesting that while the retail market is scared, the big money hasn't completely abandoned the ship.

  • Market Cap: Around $135 million (as of November 2025).
  • Analyst Consensus: Mostly 'Reduce' or 'Hold' ratings.
  • Insider Action: CEO buying signals a strong contrarian view.

Recent Market Reactions and the CEO's Bet

The stock market has reacted sharply to recent news, which is typical for a smaller, high-volatility name like Traeger, Inc. Following the Q3 2025 earnings announcement in November, the stock price dropped by 12% in the subsequent week. This was a clear sign of disappointment, as the reported Earnings Per Share (EPS) loss of ($0.17) missed the analyst consensus of ($0.03) by a wide margin. That's a huge miss.

But here's the interesting part: the CEO, Jeremy Andrus, has been making a bold, public bet. In June 2025, he significantly expanded his stake by purchasing approximately 727,000 shares of common stock, a move that increased his total ownership to about 13.1%. This aggressive insider buying is a classic contrarian indicator, and it briefly fueled a 31% stock gain around that time. When the person who knows the business best is pouring his own money in, you pay attention.

Analyst Perspectives on Key Investors

Analysts are generally mapping a difficult near-term path for Traeger, Inc., but they acknowledge the financial muscle and influence of the major shareholders. The consensus 12-month average price target is around $2.09, though the range is wide-from a low of $1.00 to a high of $3.00. This wide range itself tells you analysts are divided on the turnaround timeline.

The institutional ownership structure is dominated by a few large players, including AEA Investors LP and Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan Board, who hold substantial stakes. Their collective influence, along with the CEO's increased holdings, has fueled speculation that these major shareholders might explore strategic options, such as taking the company private (a leveraged buyout, or LBO). For a company with a negative Return on Equity (ROE) of -11.31% and a high debt-to-equity ratio of 2.15, a private equity solution could be seen as the most direct path to restructuring away from public market scrutiny.

Here's the quick math on the 2025 fiscal year outlook:

Metric Q3 2025 Actual/Forecast Analyst Consensus
Revenue $125.4 million (Q3 Actual) $111.04 million (Q3 Consensus)
EPS (Q3) ($0.17) Loss ($0.03) Loss
FY 2025 EPS Forecast N/A (Guidance Withdrawn) ($0.12) Loss

What this estimate hides is the ongoing cost discipline, even as revenue growth is forecast to be a modest 1.7% per year, trailing the broader US market's projected 10.4% pace. The institutional investors are essentially betting on brand loyalty and management's ability to cut costs and mitigate the impact of tariffs, which can be as high as 45% on grills produced in China. If you want a deeper dive into the balance sheet, you should read Breaking Down Traeger, Inc. (COOK) Financial Health: Key Insights for Investors.

The clear action here is to watch the next few quarters for signs that the CEO's confidence is translating into tangible results, specifically a narrowing of the full-year 2025 EPS loss from the forecasted ($0.12).

DCF model

Traeger, Inc. (COOK) DCF Excel Template

    5-Year Financial Model

    40+ Charts & Metrics

    DCF & Multiple Valuation

    Free Email Support


Disclaimer

All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.

We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site—including articles or product references—constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.

All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.