electroCore, Inc. (ECOR) Bundle
You're looking at electroCore, Inc. (ECOR) and asking the same question everyone is: does the bioelectronic technology growth story justify the risk in a pre-profit company? Honestly, it's a classic biotech tug-of-war between strong commercial traction and continued cash burn. The company is defintely gaining ground, increasing its full-year 2025 revenue guidance to a range of $31.5 million to $32.5 million, following a strong Q3 2025 with $8.7 million in net sales, a 33% jump year-over-year. But here's the quick math: that growth still came with a $3.4 million GAAP net loss in the quarter. So, who is buying into this high-growth, high-burn model? We see major institutional players like AWM Investment Company Inc. and Vanguard Group Inc. holding a collective stake of around 11.53% to 15.51%, betting on the non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) technology, yet the Chief Financial Officer recently sold 2,166 shares for $13,385.88. Are the institutions chasing the aggressive analyst consensus price target of $25.50, or are they just positioning for the expected positive adjusted EBITDA in the second half of 2026?
Who Invests in electroCore, Inc. (ECOR) and Why?
If you're looking at electroCore, Inc. (ECOR), you're looking at a classic commercial-stage bioelectronic medicine play, and the investor base reflects that high-growth, high-risk profile. The ownership is heavily concentrated, with insiders and a few key institutional players driving the stock's direction, not the typical retail crowd.
The core of the story is that a small group of high-conviction investors-mostly insiders and specialized funds-own the majority of the stock, betting on the commercial success of non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) technology. As of the latest filings, the ownership structure shows a clear tilt toward those who know the company best.
Key Investor Types: A Concentrated Ownership Structure
The investor profile for electroCore, Inc. is unusual because it's dominated by two groups: company insiders and a select group of institutional investors, leaving the public float (the shares available for trading) relatively small. This means a few large trades can really move the stock.
The most striking feature is the high level of insider ownership, which stands at approximately 37.28% as of November 2025. This includes executives and directors, like Joseph P. Errico, who holds the largest individual stake with over 3.86 million shares, representing about 48.30% of the company.
Institutional ownership, while lower than in a large-cap stock, is still significant, totaling over 1.27 million shares held by 48 institutional owners in the latest filings. This group includes a mix of passive index funds and active hedge funds, creating a push-pull dynamic.
- Insiders: Own the largest block, showing deep conviction.
- Institutional Investors: Hold about 26.74% of the stock.
- Retail Investors: Hold the remaining small, volatile portion.
Investment Motivations: Betting on Commercial Growth
Investors are attracted to electroCore, Inc. for one primary reason: the steep growth curve of its core products, gammaCore and Truvaga, in the non-invasive bioelectronic market. This is a pure growth play, not a value or income stock-there are no dividends here.
The numbers from the 2025 fiscal year tell the story of a company gaining commercial traction. The company's net sales for the third quarter of 2025 reached $8.7 million, marking a strong 33% increase over the same period in 2024. Year-to-date net sales through Q3 2025 were $22.8 million, up 26% year-over-year. For the full year, the company guided toward a total revenue of approximately $30.0 million.
The investment thesis is simple: revenue is growing fast, especially from the Veterans Administration (VA) market for the prescription gammaCore device, and the consumer wellness products like Truvaga are expanding. Honestly, the high gross margin of 87% reported in Q2 2025 is defintely a key draw, even with the GAAP net loss of $3.7 million in that same quarter.
You can track the company's progress in detail here: Breaking Down electroCore, Inc. (ECOR) Financial Health: Key Insights for Investors
Investment Strategies: The Active vs. Passive Divide
The institutional holders of electroCore, Inc. employ a few distinct strategies, which is typical for a small-cap biotech stock. You see the passive, long-term holders alongside the quick-moving quantitative funds.
On one side, you have the passive behemoths like Vanguard Group Inc. and Blackrock, Inc., which hold shares mainly through their index funds (like the Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund). Vanguard Group Inc. held 233,473 shares as of Q3 2025, while Blackrock, Inc. held 25,964 shares in the same period. They are long-term holders by mandate, providing a foundational level of stability.
On the other side, you have the active, high-turnover players. AWM Investment Company, Inc., the largest institutional holder with 318,106 shares in Q1 2025, is a specialized fund that often takes a high-conviction, growth-oriented approach. We also see hedge funds like Renaissance Technologies Llc, which decreased its position by over 44% (selling 80,400 shares) in the third quarter of 2025, suggesting a systematic, short-term trading strategy based on quantitative signals.
Here's a quick look at the top institutional holders and their Q3 2025 positions:
| Owner Name | Shares Held (Q3 2025) | Change in Position (Q3 2025) | Strategy Implied |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard Group Inc. | 233,473 | Increased by 0.49% | Passive/Index Holding |
| Renaissance Technologies Llc | 100,286 | Decreased by 44.50% | Short-Term/Quantitative Trading |
| Geode Capital Management, Llc | 69,629 | Increased by 4.64% | Passive/Index Holding |
| Blackrock, Inc. | 25,964 | Decreased Position | Passive/Index Holding |
The recent insider buying, such as Director Thomas J. Errico accumulating 25,000 shares in the last six months, suggests a strong belief in the company's future, but you must factor in the net loss and cash burn when assessing this growth-at-all-costs strategy.
Institutional Ownership and Major Shareholders of electroCore, Inc. (ECOR)
You're looking at electroCore, Inc. (ECOR) because you see the potential in their non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) technology, but you need to know who else is at the table. Honestly, the institutional ownership picture is a classic micro-cap story: a small, dedicated group of funds holds a significant stake, and their trading activity can create real volatility.
As of the most recent filings for the third quarter of 2025 (Q3 2025), institutional investors collectively hold around 15.51% of electroCore, Inc.'s stock. This represents a total of approximately 1,273,407 shares held by 48 institutional owners. That's a concentrated ownership structure, so when one of these larger players moves, the stock defintely feels it.
Top Institutional Investors and Their Stakes
The largest institutional holders are primarily specialized investment firms and index funds, which tells you two things: some are making a pure play on the company's growth story, and others are simply tracking the overall market indices. The top shareholders, based on their Q3 2025 13F filings, are listed below. Notice the mix of active managers like AWM Investment Company, Inc. and passive giants like Vanguard Group Inc.
| Institutional Investor | Shares Held (as of 9/30/2025) | Change in Shares (Q3 2025) | Change in Percentage (Q3 2025) |
|---|---|---|---|
| AWM Investment Company, Inc. | 318,106 (as of 5/15/2025) | -48,180 (Q2 2025) | -15.1% (Q2 2025) |
| Vanguard Group Inc | 233,473 | +1,140 | +0.491% |
| Renaissance Technologies Llc | 100,286 | -80,400 | -44.497% |
| International Assets Investment Management, Llc | 77,020 | 0 | 0% |
| Geode Capital Management, Llc | 69,629 | +3,087 | +4.639% |
| Blackrock, Inc. | 25,964 | -1,252 | -4.6% |
Here's the quick math: AWM Investment Company, Inc. is the dominant active investor, but their Q2 2025 reduction of over 48,000 shares was a clear sign of de-risking. You can learn more about the company's core business model and history here: electroCore, Inc. (ECOR): History, Ownership, Mission, How It Works & Makes Money.
Recent Shifts: Buying, Selling, and Mixed Signals
The recent ownership changes show a split sentiment among the big players. This is common for a growth-stage bioelectronic medicine company like electroCore, Inc. that is focused on commercializing its products, such as gammaCore and Truvaga. You have some funds taking profits or reducing exposure, and others initiating or building positions, often based on different views of the company's near-term sales trajectory.
- Major Selling: Renaissance Technologies Llc cut its stake dramatically by nearly 44.5%, shedding 80,400 shares in Q3 2025. This is a huge move that suggests a fundamental shift in their quantitative models' view of the stock's risk-reward profile.
- Significant Adding: On the flip side, smaller, more specialized funds are increasing their bets. For example, PERRITT CAPITAL MANAGEMENT INC added a massive 69,200 shares in Q2 2025, which was a jump of over 692%. They clearly see a catalyst others are missing.
- Passive Stability: Vanguard Group Inc. and Geode Capital Management, Llc, both largely passive index trackers, maintained or slightly increased their positions, adding 1,140 shares and 3,087 shares respectively in Q3 2025. Their small increases are expected as the company's market capitalization grows, keeping pace with the index they track.
What this estimate hides is the timing: these filings are backward-looking. The Q3 2025 moves happened before the company announced record Q3 2025 net sales of $8.7 million, a 33% increase year-over-year, and raised its full-year 2025 revenue guidance to between $31.5 million and $32.5 million. The next round of filings will show if that good news reversed the selling trend.
The Impact of Institutional Activity on Strategy
Large institutional investors play two critical roles: they provide liquidity and they can influence corporate strategy, especially in smaller companies where their stake is a large portion of the float. When institutions hold over 15% of the stock, their collective voice matters.
A high level of institutional ownership, even with mixed trading, lends credibility to the stock. It means sophisticated investors have done the due diligence on the gammaCore product and the commercialization strategy, particularly the strong sales within the Department of Veteran Affairs (VA) market, where gammaCore sales increased 16% over Q3 2024. Their presence reduces the risk perception for other investors.
Still, the high turnover-with 13 institutions adding shares and 13 decreasing positions in Q2 2025-creates significant price volatility. This is a double-edged sword: it provides great entry points for conviction buyers, but it also makes the stock jumpy. The company's increased investment in selling and marketing, which drove Q3 2025 selling, general, and administrative expenses up by $2.1 million compared to the prior year, is a strategic move that institutional investors will be watching closely to ensure it translates into sustainable revenue growth. If that growth falters, expect more funds to follow the lead of Renaissance Technologies Llc and reduce their exposure.
Next Step: Check the Q4 2025 13F filings in early 2026 to see if the increased revenue guidance for the full year 2025 (up to $32.5 million) has stabilized or reversed the institutional selling trend.
Key Investors and Their Impact on electroCore, Inc. (ECOR)
You're looking at electroCore, Inc. (ECOR), a commercial-stage bioelectronic medicine company, and you need to know who the big money players are and what they're doing. The investor profile is classic small-cap biotech: a mix of specialized hedge funds making high-conviction bets and major index funds providing the necessary ballast.
The institutional ownership stands at around 15.51% of the float as of late 2025, which is a moderate level for a company with a market capitalization around $44.8 million. This means insider ownership-including directors and executives-is defintely a significant factor here, sitting at a high 37.28%.
The High-Conviction Hedge Funds and Index Giants
When you look at the 13F filings for the 2025 fiscal year, two names stand out for their active trading: AWM Investment Company, Inc. and NewEdge Advisors, LLC. These funds are making directional bets, moving large blocks of shares, which signals a belief in the company's non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) technology like gammaCore and Truvaga.
The largest institutional holders as of the third quarter of 2025 include:
- AWM Investment Company, Inc.: A major player, holding 318,106 shares (valued at an estimated $2.13 million in Q1 2025).
- Vanguard Group Inc: A passive giant, holding 233,473 shares as of September 30, 2025.
- Renaissance Technologies Llc: A quantitative hedge fund, holding 100,286 shares as of Q3 2025.
- Blackrock, Inc.: Another index-tracking behemoth, holding 25,964 shares as of September 30, 2025.
Mapping Recent Investor Moves (2025)
The recent moves by these funds show a clear pattern of volatility and conviction, which is typical for a growth-focused bioelectronic company. Here's the quick math on the biggest changes we've seen in the first half of 2025:
| Investor | Quarter | Shares Change (Amount) | Shares Change (%) | Estimated Value of Move |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AWM Investment Company, Inc. | Q1 2025 (Buy) | +154,973 | +95.0% | $1,036,769 |
| NewEdge Advisors, LLC | Q1 2025 (Buy) | +145,047 | +857.9% | $970,364 |
| NewEdge Advisors, LLC | Q2 2025 (Sell) | -99,999 | -61.7% | ($527,994) |
| Renaissance Technologies Llc | Q3 2025 (Sell) | -80,400 | -44.497% | N/A |
AWM and NewEdge made aggressive buys in Q1 2025, pouring over $2 million into the stock combined, but NewEdge then pulled back sharply in Q2 2025. This tells you that for these smaller funds, the investment thesis is highly sensitive to near-term news-like the Q3 2025 net sales of $8.7 million, which was a 33% increase year-over-year, but still resulted in a net loss.
Insider Confidence and Board-Level Influence
The most direct influence comes from the company's own leadership. Insider buying, especially by directors, is a strong signal of confidence. Director Thomas J. Errico, MD, for example, purchased 15,000 shares for $67,050 in August 2025, and was elected Chairman of the Board in September 2025. That's a clear commitment.
However, you also saw a small but notable insider sale on November 12, 2025, when CFO Joshua Lev sold 2,166 shares for $13,385.88. This was a routine sale, likely for tax or liquidity reasons, but it's a reminder that even positive news like the Q3 2025 cash balance of $13.2 million doesn't stop executives from diversifying a small part of their holdings.
The real investor influence isn't just in trading volume; it's also in strategic capital. The company's ability to secure a new debt facility from Avenue Capital, mentioned alongside the Q2 2025 results, shows that influential financial partners are willing to fund the company's long-term growth strategy, even if it delays profitability. This kind of financing is a vote of confidence in the underlying technology and the company's Mission Statement, Vision, & Core Values of electroCore, Inc. (ECOR).
Market Impact and Investor Sentiment
You're looking at electroCore, Inc. (ECOR), a company with a fascinating bioelectronic medicine platform, but the investor profile is a study in contrasts: strong insider conviction versus a cautious Wall Street and a volatile stock price. The core sentiment is a mix of long-term optimism driven by product adoption and near-term realism focused on cash flow and profitability.
Management's confidence is high, especially after raising the full-year 2025 revenue guidance to a range of $31.5 million to $32.5 million, up from an earlier projection of approximately $30.0 million. This is a clear signal that the prescription device sales, like gammaCore, and the non-prescription Truvaga product line are gaining traction. Honestly, that kind of revenue lift is defintely a positive sign for a growth-stage company.
- Q3 2025 net sales hit a record $8.7 million, a 33% year-over-year increase.
- Gross margin remains strong at 86% for Q3 2025.
- The company expects to reach $12.0 million in quarterly revenue and its first quarter of positive adjusted EBITDA in the second half of 2026.
Who Holds the Cards: Major Shareholders and Insider Conviction
The ownership structure at electroCore, Inc. is heavily concentrated, which is a key factor in understanding investor sentiment. The largest shareholders are insiders, meaning the people running the company have the most skin in the game. This concentration can be a double-edged sword, offering stability but also limiting the public float (the number of shares available for trading).
The largest individual shareholder is Joseph P. Errico, holding a massive 48.30% of the company's shares, totaling 3.86 million shares. Merck Global Health Innovation Fund LLC is also a significant owner, controlling 41.85%. This means a small group of individuals and strategic funds essentially controls the company's direction, which is why the institutional ownership percentage is relatively low at around 9.10%.
Here's the quick math on the top ownership stakes, based on recent filings:
| Major Shareholder Type | Key Entity | Ownership Percentage | Shares Held (Approx.) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Insider (Individual) | Joseph P. Errico | 48.30% | 3,861,942 |
| Insider (Strategic Fund) | Merck Global Health Innovation Fund LLC | 41.85% | 3,346,032 |
| Institutional (Largest) | AWM Investment Company, Inc. | N/A | 318,106 |
The high insider ownership-around 164.31% when aggregating all insider holdings-suggests deep conviction in the long-term potential, despite the current losses. For a deeper dive into their product lines, you can check out electroCore, Inc. (ECOR): History, Ownership, Mission, How It Works & Makes Money.
Market Volatility and Insider Moves
Market reactions to electroCore, Inc.'s financial results and insider activity have been sharp. When the company reported Q2 2025 results, the stock tumbled approximately 20.6% in after-hours trading. Why? Because while revenue beat estimates, the reported Earnings Per Share (EPS) of -$0.35 was worse than the estimated -$0.31, highlighting the market's focus on the path to profitability.
More recently, the stock traded down 1.9% to $5.60 on November 15, 2025, following the disclosure of an insider sale. The Chief Financial Officer, Joshua Lev, sold 2,166 shares for a total transaction value of $13,385.88. This doesn't signal a mass exodus, but any CFO sale is something investors watch closely, especially when the stock is already trading near its 52-week low of $4.16.
Analyst Perspectives: Hold Consensus with a High Target
The analyst community holds a mixed view, which is common for a growth-stage medical device company still burning cash. The consensus rating is a 'Hold,' but the average price target remains remarkably high at $25.50. That target forecasts a significant upside from the recent price of $4.88, but it also reflects the wide range of possible outcomes.
The consensus EPS forecast for the current fiscal year (FY 2025) is a loss of -$1.49 per share. This projected loss, coupled with the Q3 2025 GAAP net loss of $3.4 million, is the main reason for the 'Hold' rating. Analysts are essentially saying: the technology and market opportunity are huge, hence the high price target, but the execution risk and the timeline to cash flow break-even are still too uncertain for a strong 'Buy.'
What this estimate hides is the potential for a rapid change in sentiment if the company hits its target of achieving positive adjusted EBITDA in the second half of 2026. That's the real inflection point everyone is waiting for.

electroCore, Inc. (ECOR) DCF Excel Template
5-Year Financial Model
40+ Charts & Metrics
DCF & Multiple Valuation
Free Email Support
Disclaimer
All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.
We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site—including articles or product references—constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.
All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.