Elevation Oncology, Inc. (ELEV) Bundle
You're looking at Elevation Oncology, Inc. (ELEV) and wondering why institutional money is still circulating a stock that has been acquired, right? The direct takeaway is this: the investment thesis shifted from a high-risk biotech pipeline play to a calculated liquidation bet, but the major players haven't completely cashed out. Institutional investors, including Frazier Life Sciences Management and Vanguard Group Inc., held about 49.59% of the shares as of September 2025, which is a significant chunk for a company that was acquired by Concentra Biosciences in July 2025 for just $0.36 per share in cash. So, who are these sophisticated buyers and why are they holding onto a stock trading near $0.365 as of November 2025?
The answer is the Contingent Value Right (CVR), the financial instrument that is essentially a lottery ticket tied to the value of the remaining drug candidate, EO-1022. Elevation Oncology reported a net loss of $14.2 million in Q1 2025, but the CVR promises shareholders 100% of the closing net cash exceeding $26.4 million, plus 80% of any net proceeds from an EO-1022 disposition. This means the investment isn't about the Q1 2025 R&D spend of $6.9 million anymore; it's a pure-play on the final cash balance and the potential value of that single, focused asset. Are these institutions betting on a higher cash payout or a quick sale of EO-1022? Let's dig into the 13F filings to see the real money flow and what their models are telling them about that CVR's defintely uncertain value.
Who Invests in Elevation Oncology, Inc. (ELEV) and Why?
You're looking at Elevation Oncology, Inc. (ELEV) right now, and the investment story is no longer about a long-shot drug hitting Phase 3 trials; it's an event-driven play. The direct takeaway is this: the investor base is a mix of specialized biotech funds and passive index trackers, but the primary motivation for new money is the pending acquisition by Concentra Biosciences, which has fundamentally capped the near-term upside.
As a seasoned analyst, I see the investor profile reflecting a company in transition, moving from a high-risk, high-reward clinical-stage biotech to a merger target. This shift means the typical growth investor is either selling out or holding for the Contingent Value Right (CVR) payout, while arbitrageurs are stepping in.
Key Investor Types and Ownership Breakdown
The ownership structure of Elevation Oncology, Inc. is dominated by institutional players, which is common for a clinical-stage oncology company, but the mix is telling. As of mid-2025, institutional investors hold approximately 49.59% of the outstanding shares. This leaves a significant portion-about 45.31%-in the hands of retail investors and a smaller 5.1% held by company insiders who have already agreed to support the merger.
The institutional base breaks down into three core groups:
- Specialized Biotech/Hedge Funds: These are the active, high-conviction investors. Firms like BML Capital Management LLC, which held the largest stake at 9.947% as of May 2025, and Opaleye Management Inc. (2.435% as of August 2025), are typical in this space. They invest based on the potential of the drug pipeline (like EO-1022, their HER3 Antibody-Drug Conjugate) or, more recently, the specifics of the acquisition deal.
- Passive Index Funds: Large asset managers like Vanguard Group Inc. and Fidelity Investments, through their index funds (e.g., Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund), hold shares simply because Elevation Oncology, Inc. is part of a small-cap index like the Russell 2000. Their investment is mechanical, not based on a fundamental view of the company.
- M&A Arbitrageurs: Following the announcement of the Concentra Biosciences merger, a new class of short-term investors is likely buying in to profit from the small spread between the current stock price and the definitive cash offer of $0.36 per share. This is a pure event-driven strategy.
Investment Motivations: The Merger is the Catalyst
The traditional motivations for investing in a biotech-massive growth potential from a blockbuster drug-have been largely replaced by the terms of the merger. Honestly, the stock is now a bet on the deal closing quickly and the value of the CVR.
Here's the quick math on the current situation. The company reported a net loss of $14.2 million in Q1 2025 and had cash and equivalents of $80.7 million at the end of that quarter, with a projected cash runway into the second half of 2026. The strategic shift to focus solely on EO-1022 was a clear move to conserve capital and maximize shareholder value ahead of the deal.
The core motivations now center on two components of the acquisition:
- The Cash Floor: The guaranteed $0.36 per share in cash provides a clear, near-term exit price, assuming the tender offer closes as expected in July 2025.
- The Contingent Value Right (CVR): This is where the speculative growth is now embedded. The CVR entitles shareholders to 100% of the closing net cash exceeding $26.4 million and 80% of net proceeds from any disposition of the EO-1022 program within one year post-closing. The value of this CVR is highly speculative and depends entirely on the future success of selling or partnering the EO-1022 asset.
Elevation Oncology, Inc. does not pay a dividend, so that is defintely not a factor for any investor.
For more detail on the company's financial footing leading up to this point, you should check out Breaking Down Elevation Oncology, Inc. (ELEV) Financial Health: Key Insights for Investors.
Prevailing Investment Strategies
The major institutional investors have adopted strategies that map directly to the company's M&A status and its biotech roots. You see a clear split between passive, event-driven, and deep-value strategies.
| Investor Type | Typical Strategy | ELEV-Specific Action (2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Biotech Hedge Funds (e.g., BML Capital Management) | Catalyst-Driven/Deep Value | Holding for the CVR, betting on a successful monetization of the EO-1022 asset post-merger. |
| M&A Arbitrageurs (New Entrants) | Event-Driven Arbitrage | Buying shares near the current market price to capture the small, low-risk spread to the $0.36 cash offer. |
| Passive Index Funds (e.g., Vanguard) | Long-Term Holding/Indexing | Holding the stock until the merger officially closes and the shares are removed from the index. |
| Retail Investors | Mixed/Speculative | Highly varied; some are holding for the CVR, while others are selling to avoid the uncertainty of a CVR's value. |
The key risk here is the CVR. You are trading a known cash amount for a highly uncertain future payout tied to a single, preclinical asset. The deep-value funds are essentially making a venture capital-style bet on the future of EO-1022, while the arbitrage funds are focused purely on the short-term cash component of the deal.
Institutional Ownership and Major Shareholders of Elevation Oncology, Inc. (ELEV)
You're looking at Elevation Oncology, Inc. (ELEV) to understand its investor profile, but the most important context is the company's acquisition by Concentra Biosciences, LLC, which closed on July 23, 2025. That event fundamentally changed the ownership structure, taking the company private at $0.36 per share in cash, plus a non-tradeable contingent value right (CVR). So, the story of who was buying is really the story of who held the stock right up until the point of sale.
Before the merger, Elevation Oncology, Inc. had a significant institutional presence. As of the most recent filings in 2025, there were approximately 128 institutional owners holding a total of over 28,590,262 shares. This level of institutional holding, typical for a biotech firm, meant large funds controlled the majority of the float, giving them a huge say in the company's strategic direction, including the final sale.
The top institutional shareholders included specialist life science funds and major index trackers. Here's a look at some of the largest holders and their reported positions in 2025:
- Frazier Life Sciences Management, L.P.: A leading life sciences fund.
- BML Capital Management, LLC: Held a substantial stake, reported at 5,890,934 shares as of May 7, 2025, representing 9.947% of the company.
- Aisling Capital Management LP: Another key biotech-focused investor.
- Vanguard Group Inc: A major index fund manager, holding shares through various funds like Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Investor Shares (VTSMX).
- Opaleye Management Inc.: Reported holding 1,442,061 shares as of August 15, 2025.
The Pre-Merger Ownership Shift (2025)
The institutional investment trend in the first half of the 2025 fiscal year was volatile, but the overall institutional ownership percentage trended up slightly, reaching around 49.59% in the months leading up to the July merger announcement. This accumulation happened despite the stock price declining by over 33% between November 2024 and July 2025.
Honestly, the buying activity in 2025 was a mix of passive index funds maintaining their positions and specialist funds making calculated, high-risk bets on a potential turnaround or strategic exit.
For example, some funds were actively increasing their positions in Q2 2025, while others were reducing them. Geode Capital Management LLC, a large quantitative manager, reported a significant decrease of 54.6% in their holdings as of August 8, 2025, which shows some investors were already heading for the exits. Conversely, Jane Street Group LLC reported a massive increase of +465.3% in their shares around August 14, 2025, likely a short-term trade or arbitrage play related to the pending acquisition.
Impact of Institutional Investors: The Strategic Exit
In a situation like Elevation Oncology, Inc.'s, where the company had discontinued the development of its leading asset, EO-3021, the institutional investors' role shifted from supporting clinical trials to facilitating a strategic exit. Their collective power was crucial in approving the acquisition by Concentra Biosciences, LLC.
The Board of Directors, which includes representatives from some of these investment firms, unanimously approved the merger. This decision, which valued the company at a market capitalization of approximately $21.6 million, was the ultimate action taken by the company's leadership and major shareholders.
Here's the quick math: The final tender offer price of $0.36 per share was the concrete return for shareholders. Institutional investors, especially those with large stakes like BML Capital Management, LLC, were essentially voting to liquidate their position at a fixed, albeit low, price to secure a final cash return rather than face the uncertainty of continued operations with limited cash reserves and no near-term clinical catalysts. For a deeper look at the company's long-term vision that led to this point, you can review the Mission Statement, Vision, & Core Values of Elevation Oncology, Inc. (ELEV).
Next step: Finance should analyze the CVR structure to defintely model any potential future proceeds from asset dispositions.
Key Investors and Their Impact on Elevation Oncology, Inc. (ELEV)
The investor profile for Elevation Oncology, Inc. (ELEV) in 2025 is less about long-term growth bets and much more about the final stages of a corporate acquisition. The biggest takeaway for you is that the company's fate was sealed in June 2025 when it entered a definitive merger agreement with Concentra Biosciences, LLC. The primary motivation for buyers now is either passive index tracking or a simple merger arbitrage play (betting the deal closes).
The deal offers shareholders $0.36 in cash per share, plus one Contingent Value Right (CVR). This CVR is the speculative kicker, giving you rights to a portion of any net cash over $26.4 million at closing, and 80% of net proceeds from any disposition of the EO-1022 program within one year post-closing. It's a low-risk cash payout with a high-risk, high-reward tail-end investment.
The Institutional Heavyweights: Who's Holding the Line?
As of the most recent 2025 filings, institutional investors-the large funds and asset managers-held a significant portion of Elevation Oncology, Inc. stock, roughly 49.59% in July 2025. This level of ownership means these firms collectively have a powerful voice, though their influence is now limited to accepting the merger terms. They are the ones who ultimately approved the sale.
The top holders are a mix of dedicated biotech funds and massive passive index trackers. Here's a quick look at the top institutional stakes as of the first half of 2025, showing you who was on the cap table right before the deal closed:
- BML Capital Management LLC: Held 5,890,934 shares, accounting for a 9.94% stake.
- TANG CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC: Held 4,760,000 shares, an 8.03% position.
- BlackRock, Inc.: Held 3,177,903 shares (as of March 30, 2025), representing 5.36%.
- Vanguard Group Inc.: Held 2,585,220 shares, a 4.36% holding.
For a deeper dive into the company's financial stability that led to this strategic shift, you might want to look at Breaking Down Elevation Oncology, Inc. (ELEV) Financial Health: Key Insights for Investors.
Recent Moves: Arbitrage and Exit
The most telling investor activity in mid-2025 was a sharp divergence in strategy between passive funds and active managers, all reacting to the acquisition news. The name you know, BlackRock, Inc., made a massive move to exit. Honestly, this is typical when a low-premium deal is announced, especially in biotech.
Here's the quick math on the major moves:
- BlackRock's Massive Reduction: On June 30, 2025, BlackRock, Inc. executed a transaction reducing their stake by a dramatic 88.39%, selling 2,808,855 shares at a price near the offer. This wasn't a vote of no confidence; it was simply a large index tracker selling off a position that was about to be liquidated for cash.
- The Arbitrage Play: On the flip side, some funds were buying. Deltec Asset Management LLC, for example, increased its holding by 100% in June 2025, acquiring 1,436,363 shares. This is a classic merger arbitrage move, buying shares slightly below the $0.36 cash offer price to lock in a small, low-risk profit when the deal closes.
The institutional ownership percentage actually ticked up slightly to 49.59% in July 2025, but mutual fund holdings decreased from 8.20% to 7.88% in the same period. This suggests that while index funds (which are often slow to move) maintained their positions, some active mutual funds were defintely selling out.
Insider Alignment and Influence
In a merger scenario, the most critical investor influence comes from the insiders-the officers and directors. They hold a relatively small but influential stake, and their support is crucial for the deal's success.
Elevation Oncology, Inc. officers, directors, and their affiliates, who collectively held approximately 5.1% of the Common Stock, signed agreements to tender their shares in the offer. This is a strong signal of alignment, ensuring the Concentra Biosciences, LLC acquisition had the necessary internal backing to proceed to the shareholder tender phase. Their support essentially guaranteed the deal would meet the required majority tender condition.
Market Impact and Investor Sentiment
You're looking at Elevation Oncology, Inc. (ELEV) right now, and the investor profile is less about long-term growth bets and more about a near-term cash-out event. The overarching sentiment is a blend of relief and disappointment, largely dictated by the definitive merger agreement announced in June 2025.
The company's Board and insiders, who own about 5.1% of the common stock, have signaled a positive, albeit pragmatic, sentiment by unanimously approving the acquisition by Concentra Biosciences, LLC. However, this was preceded by a public push from activist investor BML Capital Management, which owns 9.9% of shares, to simply wind down operations and return cash to shareholders, suggesting a negative long-term view on the pipeline's viability. Institutional investors still hold a significant stake, with ownership around 49.59% as of September 2025, but their position is now locked into the terms of the merger.
The acquisition price sets the new floor, not the old analyst models.
Recent Market Reactions and Ownership Shifts
The stock market's reaction to Elevation Oncology, Inc.'s strategic shifts in 2025 was swift and brutal, reflecting the high-risk nature of clinical-stage biotech. When the company announced the discontinuation of its lead candidate, EO-3021, in March 2025, the stock dropped by 28% in pre-market trading. That's a classic, sharp correction when a key clinical asset fails to meet the bar for success.
The subsequent merger announcement in June 2025 provided an exit, but at a low valuation. Concentra Biosciences, LLC agreed to pay $0.36 in cash per share plus a Contingent Value Right (CVR). This CVR is the potential upside, entitling shareholders to 100% of closing net cash exceeding $26.4 million and 80% of net proceeds from any EO-1022 disposition within one year post-closing. This structure shows the buyers are paying for the cash on the balance sheet and a small option on the remaining pipeline asset, EO-1022, not the original promise of EO-3021. For more on the company's journey to this point, you can review its history and mission here: Elevation Oncology, Inc. (ELEV): History, Ownership, Mission, How It Works & Makes Money.
The institutional ownership breakdown shows a handful of major players who will be impacted by this deal:
- Institutional Ownership (Sep 2025): ~49.59%
- Activist Investor Stake (BML Capital Management): 9.9%
- Insider Support for Acquisition: 5.1%
Analyst Perspectives: The Great Disconnect
Honestly, the analyst consensus on Elevation Oncology, Inc. (ELEV) is a perfect example of how quickly models can become obsolete in biotech. As of November 2025, the consensus rating from Wall Street analysts is still officially a Hold, based on the views of 11 analysts. The average twelve-month price target is $2.62, which implies a massive predicted upside of 616.89% from the recent trading price of approximately $0.365 per share.
Here's the quick math: The acquisition price is $0.36 per share. The average analyst target is $2.62. That's a huge disconnect. What this estimate hides is that many of those price targets were likely set before the EO-3021 discontinuation in March 2025 and before the Concentra Biosciences, LLC acquisition agreement in June 2025. The actual market price, which trades right near the $0.36 acquisition cash component, tells the real story. The consensus rating score of 2.00 is also lower than the average for the medical companies sector, which sits at 2.32.
The reality is that the stock is now an arbitrage play, trading on the certainty of the acquisition price plus the unknown value of the CVR, not on the speculative future of the original pipeline. The original, higher price targets are now largely irrelevant, defintely not changing any near-term investment decision.
| Metric (as of Nov 2025) | Value | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Acquisition Cash Price per Share | $0.36 | The guaranteed floor from Concentra Biosciences, LLC. |
| Consensus Analyst Rating | Hold | Based on 11 analysts. |
| Consensus Price Target | $2.62 | Likely pre-acquisition model value; a significant disconnect from reality. |
| Q1 2025 Net Loss | $14.2 million | Reported net loss for the quarter ending March 31, 2025. |
Your next step, if you hold shares, is to assess the potential value of the CVR, which is the only remaining variable for maximizing your return beyond the guaranteed cash portion.

Elevation Oncology, Inc. (ELEV) DCF Excel Template
5-Year Financial Model
40+ Charts & Metrics
DCF & Multiple Valuation
Free Email Support
Disclaimer
All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.
We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site—including articles or product references—constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.
All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.