Hingham Institution for Savings (HIFS) Bundle
You're looking at Hingham Institution for Savings, a stock that has always felt like a bit of a club, and you're wondering who's still buying in this volatile rate environment. Honestly, the investor profile tells a fascinating story of conviction: roughly 49.33% of the stock is held by institutional investors and hedge funds, but what's really striking is that insiders-the people who know the business defintely best-still own approximately 27% of the outstanding shares as of early 2025. This isn't your typical widely-held regional bank; it's a high-conviction play. So, why the renewed interest from the big money, especially after the bank reported a massive jump in Q3 2025 net income to $17,295,000, which pushed the annualized return on average equity up to a strong 15.15%? We're seeing major moves, like Bank of America Corp DE growing its position by 337.2% in the third quarter alone, suggesting a clear belief that the turnaround is real, driven by their focus on quality commercial real estate lending against a total asset base of $4.531 billion. Do these ownership numbers signal a stable long-term bet, or is this just a tactical trade on a cyclical recovery? Let's dive into who's buying and what their actions tell us about HIFS's near-term trajectory.
Who Invests in Hingham Institution for Savings (HIFS) and Why?
You're looking at Hingham Institution for Savings (HIFS) and trying to figure out who is buying this regional bank stock, especially after the recent volatility in the sector. The direct takeaway is that the investor base is a mix of long-term-focused institutional capital and a highly aligned insider group, all betting on a compelling valuation turnaround and a sustainable, if modest, dividend.
The investor profile for Hingham Institution for Savings is defintely not a typical, widely-held bank stock. It's dominated by sophisticated institutions and a tight-knit internal group, which means the stock price can be less sensitive to retail noise but more vulnerable to the trading decisions of a few large funds. This is a stock where you need to look past the daily price swings and focus on the fundamentals.
Key Investor Types: Institutional and Aligned Insiders
The ownership structure at Hingham Institution for Savings tells you a lot about the investment philosophy. Institutional investors-like mutual funds, pension funds, and asset managers-own the majority, holding about 59% of the company's outstanding shares as of July 2025.
But the real story here is the high insider ownership. Management, particularly the Gaughen family leadership, owns over 27% of outstanding shares. That's a huge stake for a public company, and it means their incentives are powerfully aligned with yours as a shareholder. Honestly, that level of alignment is rare and a big green flag for long-term holders.
- Institutional Owners: Hold 59% of shares.
- Insider Ownership: Over 27% of outstanding shares.
- Private Company Ownership: Accounts for 8.4%.
The remaining float is held by individual retail investors, who are often drawn to the bank's long-term performance track record.
Investment Motivations: Quality, Valuation, and Sustainable Income
Investors aren't buying Hingham Institution for Savings for a high yield; they're buying for quality and a valuation disconnect they believe will close. The forward annual dividend is modest, around $2.52 per share, translating to a yield of roughly 0.92% as of November 2025. What matters is the safety of that dividend, which is excellent, with a low payout ratio of about 12.2%.
The primary motivation in 2025 has been the compelling valuation following the recent interest rate cycle. An analyst price target of $331.18 in July 2025 implied a potential 24% upside as loan growth and net interest margins recover. The quality of the bank's operations is also a major draw, evidenced by a net profit margin that jumped to 49.9% for the year (as of October 2025), up from 39.6% twelve months prior. That's a massive jump in profitability.
Here's the quick math on recent performance: Core net income (excluding one-time gains) for Q1 2025 was $6,125,000, a remarkable 175.2% rise in core net income per share compared to the same period in 2024. That turnaround is what the institutional money is chasing.
| Metric | 2025 Value (Q1 or Q3) | Investment Appeal |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 2025 Core Net Income | $6,125,000 | Turnaround/Growth |
| Q3 2025 Efficiency Ratio | 38.26% | Operational Excellence |
| Q3 2025 Return on Equity (ROE) | 15.15% (reported) | Profitability/Efficiency |
| Book Value per Share (Mar 31, 2025) | $200.69 | Valuation Anchor |
Investment Strategies: Value, Long-Term, and Short-Sellers
The dominant strategy among the large institutional holders is classic value investing. They look at the bank's long-term track record-an 11% compound annual growth rate in returns over 30 years-and see a temporary dip in the stock price as a buying opportunity. They are long-term holders who focus on the bank's conservative lending model and high-quality loan book, which primarily consists of commercial and residential real estate mortgages. For a deeper dive into the balance sheet, you should check out Breaking Down Hingham Institution for Savings (HIFS) Financial Health: Key Insights for Investors.
Still, not everyone is bullish. The stock has a significant short interest-around 11.68% of the float as of November 2025. This high short interest indicates that a segment of the market, likely hedge funds and other short-term traders, is betting on a price decline. These investors are focused on near-term risks, like the high concentration of real estate loans and the fact that the Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratio of 13.1x (Oct 2025) is higher than the US Banks industry average of 11.3x.
So, you have a tug-of-war: value investors are buying the long-term quality and the 2025 turnaround story, while short-sellers are focused on the premium valuation and sector-specific risks. Your action should be to determine which narrative has the stronger data. Finance: Re-run the discounted cash flow (DCF) model using Q3 2025's 1.74% net interest margin to check the valuation target by next Friday.
Institutional Ownership and Major Shareholders of Hingham Institution for Savings
You want to know who is buying Hingham Institution for Savings (HIFS) and why, and the answer is clear: institutional money is paying a premium for a high-quality, disciplined bank, especially as its financial metrics rebound in 2025. Institutional investors and hedge funds currently own roughly 49.33% of the stock, a significant stake that signals confidence in the bank's conservative model, even with its above-average valuation.
I've spent two decades watching how these large players move, and for HIFS, the story is about stability and a clear operational focus, which is defintely attractive in a volatile banking sector. The bank's Q3 2025 results, with net income soaring to $17.295 million, up 195.1% year-over-year, show the payoff of that approach.
Top Institutional Investors: The Anchor Shareholders
The investor profile for Hingham Institution for Savings is anchored by a mix of traditional asset managers and specialized funds. These are firms that value the bank's track record, which includes 127 consecutive quarterly dividends, even if the special dividend tradition was paused in 2023 and 2024.
The largest holders are putting serious capital to work, effectively acting as long-term stewards of the company. Here's a snapshot of the top institutional investors and the value of their reported holdings, based on the most recent 2025 disclosures:
| Major Shareholder Name | Reported Market Value (Approx.) | Focus |
|---|---|---|
| Maren Capital LLC | $49.70 million | Hedge Fund/Specialized Capital |
| Royce & Associates LP | $29.75 million | Small-Cap Specialist |
| Vanguard Group Inc. | $25.81 million | Passive/Index Fund Management |
| Doma Perpetual Capital Management LLC | $20.82 million | Hedge Fund |
| UBS Group AG | $18.46 million | Global Financial Services/Wealth Management |
What this quick math shows is that while you have massive index players like Vanguard Group Inc., you also have active, specialized capital like Maren Capital LLC and Royce & Associates LP taking sizable, concentrated positions. That's a strong signal.
Recent Shifts: Who's Increasing and Decreasing Stakes?
The near-term trend for HIFS has been a notable increase in institutional conviction, particularly throughout the first three quarters of 2025. This buying activity suggests that many institutions believe the worst of the interest rate pressure on the bank's net interest margin (NIM) is over, or that the valuation is compelling enough given the quality of the loan book.
The third quarter of 2025 saw several large, aggressive stake increases, which is where you see the real-time conviction:
- Bank of America Corp DE boosted its holdings by a massive 337.2% in Q3 2025, buying an additional 10,687 shares.
- Two Sigma Investments LP increased its stake by 150.9% in Q3 2025, a significant move from a quantitative hedge fund.
- UBS Group AG grew its position by 15.7% in Q3 2025, adding 9,493 shares to its total of 69,998 shares.
- Maren Capital LLC, already a top holder, boosted its stake by 14.1% in Q1 2025.
These aren't small adjustments; they are material increases that reflect a strategic decision to allocate more capital to HIFS. This is a clear vote of confidence in the bank's rebound, especially with the annualized Return on Average Equity (ROAE) hitting 15.15% in Q3 2025.
Impact on Stock Price and Corporate Strategy
The role of these large investors in Hingham Institution for Savings is twofold: they validate the conservative strategy and they contribute to the stock's valuation premium. The bank's Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratio of 13.1x is currently above the US Banks industry average of 11.3x. Institutional buying pressure helps maintain this premium, as they are willing to pay more for a bank with a famously disciplined, low-cost operating model (efficiency ratio was just 38.26% in Q3 2025).
What this institutional backing means for corporate strategy is a continued focus on what works: high-quality commercial real estate lending, particularly in the Boston and Washington D.C. markets, and a push for non-interest-bearing deposits from commercial and non-profit clients. This strategic focus is paying off, with non-performing loans, while rising due to a single commercial real estate nonaccrual loan of $30.6 million, still being managed without any charge-offs in the first nine months of 2025.
The large institutional presence also means the stock can move sharply on news, even when the news is good. For example, the stock fell 4.6% after the Q3 2025 earnings report, which showed a massive 196% net income increase. This volatility is a function of a stock with light analyst coverage, where a few large institutional trades can have an outsized impact on the share price. If you want a deeper look at the fundamentals driving this investor interest, check out Breaking Down Hingham Institution for Savings (HIFS) Financial Health: Key Insights for Investors.
Next Step: Review your portfolio's exposure to regional banks and see if the quality-at-a-premium story of HIFS fits your risk-reward profile, focusing on the Q4 2025 loan quality metrics.
Key Investors and Their Impact on Hingham Institution for Savings (HIFS)
The investor profile for Hingham Institution for Savings (HIFS) is a unique blend of high-conviction institutional money and deeply entrenched insider ownership, which together create a powerful, dual influence on the stock's trajectory. You need to understand that nearly half of the company-specifically, around 49.33% of the stock-is held by institutional investors and hedge funds, but the real control story lies with the Gaughen family and other insiders.
This dynamic means that while large funds provide liquidity and market validation, the core strategy is insulated by management's significant stake. It's a bank run by long-term holders, for long-term holders, and that's defintely a rare thing in regional banking.
The Institutional Heavyweights and Their Recent Moves
Looking at the Q3 2025 filings, the institutional landscape shows a mix of passive index funds and active managers making calculated bets. The largest institutional holder is Maren Capital LLC, which had a significant position. Other major players include BlackRock, Inc. and VANGUARD GROUP INC, whose holdings are typical of index-tracking funds, providing a stable, foundational demand for the stock.
What's interesting is the aggressive buying activity from certain hedge funds in the first three quarters of 2025, signaling a belief that Hingham Institution for Savings' valuation is compelling after the recent banking sector volatility. For instance, TWO SIGMA INVESTMENTS, LP boosted its stake by a staggering 426% between Q1 and Q3 2025, while MILLENNIUM MANAGEMENT LLC increased its position by an even more dramatic 1326%.
Here's the quick math on some key institutional shifts in 2025:
- TWO SIGMA INVESTMENTS, LP: Purchased approximately 22,028 additional shares in Q3 2025.
- ROYCE & ASSOCIATES LP: Increased their position by 26%, adding 23,186 shares.
- STATE STREET CORP: Showed a strong conviction, increasing its stake by 54%, buying 28,474 shares.
- BlackRock, Inc.: Went the other way, trimming its position by 4%, selling 5,546 shares.
Insider Ownership: The Gaughen Family's Enduring Influence
The biggest influence on Hingham Institution for Savings is not a major fund; it's the management team, led by the Gaughen family. This leadership took control in 1993 after a successful proxy fight, and their long-term, conservative approach has defined the bank ever since. Management owns over 27% of the outstanding shares, which is a massive alignment of interest with shareholders.
This high insider ownership acts as a powerful deterrent to external activist investors (a shareholder who buys a significant stake to push for changes). The Gaughen family's control means company decisions-like maintaining a low-fee model or focusing on high-quality commercial real estate lending-are driven by a multi-decade compounding philosophy, not short-term earnings pressure. You can read more about this disciplined approach in Breaking Down Hingham Institution for Savings (HIFS) Financial Health: Key Insights for Investors.
Recent Insider Trading Signals
While the overall insider ownership is strong, you should still pay attention to recent insider trading. The last 12 months have seen more selling than buying. For example, Jacqueline Youngworth, a Clerk & Independent Director, has been a consistent seller in 2025. In July 2025, she divested a block of stock at $281 per share, totaling around $141k.
What this estimate hides is that these sales are often a small fraction of the total insider holdings, and they can be for personal financial planning, not a loss of confidence in the bank. Still, the pattern of more selling than buying over the last year is a data point that suggests caution, even if the sales are minor in the grand scheme of the Gaughen family's 27% stake.
Here is a snapshot of the major investor types and their stake as of Q3 2025:
| Investor Type | Approximate % of Shares Outstanding | Primary Impact on Stock |
|---|---|---|
| Insider/Management (Gaughen Family) | 27% | Strategic control, long-term stability, insulation from short-term pressure. |
| Institutional Investors & Hedge Funds | 49.33% | Market liquidity, valuation support, and short-term price movement (especially from active funds). |
| Retail/Other | ~23.67% | General market demand and supply. |
Finance: Track Q4 2025 13F filings for any continued aggressive buying by Two Sigma and Millennium, as that will validate the turnaround narrative seen in the Q3 2025 core net income of $8.5 million.
Market Impact and Investor Sentiment
The investor profile for Hingham Institution for Savings (HIFS) is currently a fascinating mix of deep-value conviction and near-term skepticism, leading to a polarized sentiment. You see a clear split between long-term holders, who trust the management's decades-long track record, and a more cautious market focused on recent balance sheet pressures.
Major shareholders, including insiders, show a long-term positive alignment, with insider ownership at a notable 15%, valued at roughly US$86 million as of July 2025. Still, the market's immediate view is definitely more negative, underscored by the significant short interest (the percentage of shares held by investors betting the price will fall), which stood at 11.68% in November 2025. That's a high number for a regional bank, and it tells you a lot of smart money is looking for a price drop.
This tension means the stock is prone to sharp moves on news. You need to look beyond the general market noise and focus on the core financial health of the bank. For a deeper dive into the fundamentals, you can check out Breaking Down Hingham Institution for Savings (HIFS) Financial Health: Key Insights for Investors.
Recent Market Reactions to Ownership and Earnings
The stock market's response to Hingham Institution for Savings's recent performance has been swift and, at times, counterintuitive. The stock price, which was trading around $272.99 on November 21, 2025, has struggled, being down 3.5% over the last year, which is a tough stretch for any investor. But, to be fair, the five-year total shareholder return (TSR)-which includes reinvested dividends-is a much healthier 21%.
A key example of this market skepticism was the reaction to the Q3 2025 earnings. Hingham Institution for Savings reported strong net income of $17.3 million, a huge 196% improvement from the same quarter last year. But the stock still fell 4.6% on October 13 following the announcement. Here's the quick math: a chunk of that profit came from an after-tax gain on equity securities, not core lending, so investors discounted the headline number.
- Q3 2025 Net Income: $17.3 million.
- Q3 2025 Basic EPS: $7.93.
- Stock Reaction: Fell 4.6% after the Q3 report.
Analyst Perspectives and Key Investor Impact
Analyst coverage for Hingham Institution for Savings is light, which is common for smaller, tightly-held banks, but the few perspectives out there are sharply divided. One analyst has a 'Strong Buy' rating, setting a price target of $331.18, which implies an upside of about 24% from the current price. This perspective is grounded in the bank's operational excellence and the strong core net income of $6.125 million reported in Q1 2025, signaling a turnaround in net interest margin (NIM) compression.
However, a more cautious view initiated a 'Hold' rating in November 2025. This analyst highlights the elevated risk profile, especially the high concentration of commercial real estate loans. This risk is becoming concrete: non-performing assets (NPAs) have risen significantly in 2025, reaching 0.71% of total assets in Q3 2025, up from just 0.03% at the end of 2024. That's a huge jump, and it's what keeps the realists on the sidelines.
The core message is that the bank's high insider ownership and long-term profitability (Q3 2025 ROE of 15.15%) are a strong positive, but the near-term risk from commercial real estate is a genuine headwind. The market is pricing in the risk, not just the profit. The table below shows a snapshot of the core financial health and the associated risks.
| Metric (2025 Fiscal Year) | Value | Investor Implication |
| Q1 2025 Book Value per Share | $200.69 | Strong tangible base for valuation. |
| Q3 2025 Non-Performing Assets to Total Assets | 0.71% | Rising credit risk, a key concern for new investors. |
| Short Interest (November 2025) | 11.68% | Significant bearish bets on the stock price. |
| Analyst Price Target (High) | $331.18 | Potential for 24% upside if turnaround holds. |
Your action here is clear: monitor the non-performing asset trend closely in the Q4 2025 report. If that number stabilizes or drops, the market sentiment could shift quickly from 'Hold' to 'Buy.'

Hingham Institution for Savings (HIFS) DCF Excel Template
5-Year Financial Model
40+ Charts & Metrics
DCF & Multiple Valuation
Free Email Support
Disclaimer
All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.
We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site—including articles or product references—constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.
All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.