Exploring Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) Investor Profile: Who’s Buying and Why?

Exploring Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) Investor Profile: Who’s Buying and Why?

US | Communication Services | Internet Content & Information | NYSE

Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) Bundle

Get Full Bundle:
$18 $12
$18 $12
$18 $12
$18 $12
$25 $15
$18 $12
$18 $12
$18 $12
$18 $12

TOTAL:

You're looking at Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) and asking the right question: with the stock trading around $26.62 as of November 2025, who is actually buying, and what do they know that the market is missing? The direct takeaway is that while institutional money is piling in, management is heading for the exits, creating a classic disconnect you need to understand. Institutional investors now own a staggering 88.81% of the company, with giants like Vanguard Group Inc and BlackRock, Inc. holding massive positions, but honestly, you have to weigh that against the fact that insiders have sold approximately $24.87 million worth of shares in the last 90 days. The business fundamentals are strong-Q3 2025 revenue hit $1.05 billion, up 17% year-over-year, and Global Monthly Active Users (MAUs) reached 600 million-but this mixed signal of institutional confidence versus insider skepticism is the core tension we need to unpack to make a smart decision.

Who Invests in Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) and Why?

If you're looking at Pinterest, Inc. (PINS), you're not alone; the investor base is overwhelmingly institutional. The direct takeaway is that nearly 89% of the company's shares are held by professional money managers, meaning their conviction, or lack thereof, drives the stock's price action, not day-to-day retail sentiment.

This high level of institutional ownership-around 88.81% as of November 2025-points to a consensus that Pinterest, Inc. is a mature growth story with a clear path to monetization. Honestly, when the big players are this entrenched, you have to pay attention to their motivations, because their moves are defintely not random.

Key Investor Types and Their Stakes

The shareholder register for Pinterest, Inc. is a textbook example of a company that has transitioned from a high-growth startup to a core holding for major asset managers. You see a clear hierarchy, from passive index funds to active, activist hedge funds.

  • Passive Institutional Investors: These are the giants like Vanguard Group Inc. and BlackRock, Inc. They hold the largest stakes because Pinterest, Inc. is a component of major indices, like the Russell 1000 or various growth ETFs. Vanguard holds about 9.03% of the shares, translating to over 60.9 million shares, while BlackRock, Inc. holds approximately 5.69%, or over 38.4 million shares, as of September 2025. They are long-term holders, essentially buying the market.
  • Hedge Funds and Activist Investors: This group is more dynamic and often looks for catalysts. The most notable is Elliott Investment Management L.P., which held a significant stake of 28 million shares as of June 2025. Their involvement often signals a push for strategic or operational changes to 'unlock value.' Hedge funds, in aggregate, decreased their holdings by 6.2 million shares in the last reported quarter, which shows a mixed sentiment on the near-term volatility.
  • Retail and Public Investors: The remaining approximately 11.48% of the shares are held by individual investors and smaller public entities. They often follow the institutional narrative but can amplify volatility, especially around earnings reports.

Investment Motivations: Why the Big Money Buys

The primary attraction for investors right now is the combination of user growth and monetization potential, especially internationally. For the trailing twelve months ending September 30, 2025, Pinterest, Inc.'s revenue was $4.057 billion, marking a solid 16.79% year-over-year increase. That's a good clip for a platform of this size.

Here's the quick math on the growth story: Global Monthly Active Users (MAUs) hit a record 578 million in Q2 2025, an 11% jump year-over-year. Plus, the company has successfully positioned itself as a 'personalized shopping destination' powered by AI, which directly addresses the high Average Revenue Per User (ARPU) gap between its U.S. and international markets.

The value proposition is also compelling. The stock has been trading near its 52-week low of $23.68 as of November 2025, giving it a relatively low price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 9.24. This lower valuation, coupled with a 'Moderate Buy' analyst consensus and an average price target of $39.55, makes it look like a classic value play in the tech sector. You're buying a growth company at a perceived discount.

2025 Fiscal Year Data Point Q2 2025 Value Significance for Investors
Revenue $998 million (17% YoY Growth) Confirms strong revenue momentum and ad demand.
Global Monthly Active Users (MAUs) 578 million (11% YoY Growth) Shows platform scale is still expanding, especially with Gen Z.
GAAP Net Income $39 million Demonstrates solid profitability, a key shift for tech companies.
Institutional Ownership 88.81% Indicates strong professional conviction in the long-term thesis.

Investment Strategies in Play

Different investors use Pinterest, Inc. for different purposes. The sheer size of the Vanguard and BlackRock, Inc. holdings means a significant portion of the stock is held in a passive, long-term strategy, buying and holding for market returns. These investors expect the company to continue its steady growth trajectory, as detailed in Pinterest, Inc. (PINS): History, Ownership, Mission, How It Works & Makes Money.

The presence of Elliott Investment Management L.P. points to an activist or event-driven strategy. They likely see a disconnect between the company's intrinsic value and its market price, pushing for changes like better international monetization or cost efficiency to force a re-rating of the stock. This is a shorter-to-medium-term catalyst strategy.

Finally, you have value-oriented growth investors who are accumulating shares because of the low P/E ratio and the high analyst price target. They are betting that the company's continuous investment in R&D-like the $359.6 million spent in Q2 2025-will pay off in higher ARPU and sustained growth, closing the gap to the price target. The insider selling of $24.87 million over 90 days is a risk these investors are weighing against the strong institutional buying.

Institutional Ownership and Major Shareholders of Pinterest, Inc. (PINS)

You're looking at Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) and trying to figure out who the big money players are and what they're doing. Honestly, the institutional ownership picture is a clear signal: the smart money is heavily invested, which suggests a belief in the long-term strategic pivot toward e-commerce and advertising monetization. As of late 2025, institutional investors-think massive mutual funds, pension funds, and endowments-own a commanding share of the company.

Total institutional ownership in Pinterest, Inc. is remarkably high, sitting at approximately 88.81% of the company's shares as of November 2025. This means that for every dollar of Pinterest stock, nearly 89 cents is held by a professional money manager. This kind of concentration gives these firms significant influence over the company's direction, especially on major votes and corporate governance issues.

The top shareholders are exactly who you'd expect to see holding large, passive stakes in a major tech platform. Here's a quick look at the largest holders and their positions as of the second quarter of 2025, which gives us the clearest fiscal year data:

Institutional Holder Shares Held (as of June 29, 2025) Market Value (in millions)
The Vanguard Group, Inc. 57,941,749 $1,955.53
BlackRock, Inc. 36,606,070 $1,235.46
Elliott Management Corporation 28,000,000 $945.00
T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. 22,274,015 $751.75

Notice BlackRock, Inc. and The Vanguard Group, Inc. at the top; they are the titans of passive investing, holding billions in market value, which is common for a well-established company like Pinterest.

Recent Shifts: Are Institutions Buying or Selling PINS?

The near-term activity shows a fascinating dynamic: a clear increase in institutional confidence, even as some insiders take profits. Institutional holdings saw a quarter-over-quarter increase of approximately 10.90% in the period ending September 2025, suggesting a net accumulation.

We've seen some aggressive buying by specific firms in 2025. For example, Whittier Trust Co. raised its stake by an eye-popping 798.4% in the first quarter, and Candriam S.C.A. increased its position by 36.9% in the second quarter. This isn't just passive index-fund buying; these are active managers making a defintely bullish call on the stock.

But it's not a one-way street. Some large holders are trimming their positions. Geode Capital Management LLC, for instance, lowered its stake by a modest 0.8% in the second quarter of 2025, selling 84,938 shares. This mixed activity means you have to look past the headline number and see where the conviction lies.

  • Institutional buying signals long-term growth belief.
  • Insider selling, totaling about $24.87 million over 90 days, shows some management caution.
  • The overall trend is net accumulation, pushing ownership to nearly 89%.

The Impact of Institutional Investors on Pinterest's Strategy

These massive institutional holdings play a critical role, not just in stock price stability, but in shaping the company's strategic roadmap. When firms own nearly 89% of the shares, their collective voice is the loudest in the room.

The most concrete example of this influence is the presence of Elliott Management Corporation. An activist investor like Elliott, holding a 4.12% stake, doesn't just sit back; they push for operational and strategic changes to 'unlock value.' This pressure has certainly accelerated Pinterest's focus on improving advertising technology and integrating e-commerce features, which is crucial for revenue growth. For a deeper dive into the company's financial standing, you should check out Breaking Down Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) Financial Health: Key Insights for Investors.

Here's the quick math: high institutional ownership often reduces stock volatility because these funds are long-term holders, not day traders. However, a sudden, coordinated sell-off by a few major players-say, if The Vanguard Group, Inc. and BlackRock, Inc. both decided to re-weight their indices-could cause a sharp drop. Their presence also reinforces the current management team's strategic decisions, provided those decisions align with maximizing shareholder return. The current analyst consensus of a 'Moderate Buy' with an average price target of $39.55 suggests the market believes the institutional optimism is warranted, despite recent earnings per share (EPS) of $0.11 falling short of expectations.

Key Investors and Their Impact on Pinterest, Inc. (PINS)

You need to know who is driving the bus at Pinterest, Inc. (PINS), and the answer is overwhelmingly institutional money. These major funds-the passive giants and the focused activists-hold the vast majority of the stock, so their moves dictate the near-term trading narrative and long-term strategic direction.

As of the 2025 fiscal year, institutional investors own approximately 88.81% of Pinterest, Inc.'s stock, a massive concentration that means retail investors are essentially riding the coattails of these behemoths. This high level of ownership is typical for a large-cap tech company, but it also means you must pay close attention to their portfolio shifts.

The Passive Giants: Vanguard and BlackRock

The largest shareholders are the index fund titans, Vanguard Group Inc and BlackRock, Inc., whose sheer size makes them perpetual top holders in nearly every major US stock. They are generally passive investors, meaning they buy and hold to match a market index, but their massive capital movements still send powerful signals.

Vanguard Group Inc remains the top institutional investor. In the first quarter of 2025, they increased their stake by 2.2%, bringing their total holdings to 58,008,711 shares, valued at approximately $1,798,270,000. BlackRock, Inc. is also a dominant force, holding around 38,438,606 shares valued at over $1.02 billion during the same period. They buy for scale and stability, not necessarily for a quick trade.

  • Vanguard and BlackRock's stakes provide a critical stability floor for the stock.
  • Their passive buying ensures consistent demand, which is defintely a good thing.
  • These funds primarily influence the company through proxy voting on governance issues.

Activist Pressure and Strategic Influence

While the passive funds are steady, the real strategic push comes from activist investors (a shareholder who buys a significant stake in a company to influence how it is run). Elliott Investment Management L.P. is the most notable activist in Pinterest, Inc.'s recent history.

Elliott Investment Management L.P. holds a significant stake, owning 28,000,000 shares valued at about $745.36 million as of the second quarter of 2025. Elliott is known for its aggressive, results-driven approach, and their initial activist position in 2022 was instrumental in the company's executive transition to CEO Bill Ready, a move that signaled a major pivot toward commerce and monetization. That's a direct line from investor influence to C-suite change.

The activist presence ensures management stays focused on improving Average Revenue Per User (ARPU) and driving the e-commerce strategy, which is crucial for capitalizing on the 600 million Global Monthly Active Users (MAUs) reported in Q3 2025. You can see how this commerce-first strategy aligns with the company's long-term vision in their Mission Statement, Vision, & Core Values of Pinterest, Inc. (PINS).

Recent Investor Moves and Near-Term Risk Mapping

Recent trading activity in late 2025 provides a clear map of near-term sentiment. You should be aware of both institutional buying and selling, plus what insiders are doing.

Here's the quick math on recent high-profile moves:

On November 18, 2025, ARK Invest, managed by Cathie Wood, sold 203,244 shares of Pinterest, Inc., reducing its position by $5.19 million. This move reflects a broader trend of reallocation away from some social media holdings and into other technology and fintech sectors. This selling pressure, while small in the grand scheme, can put a psychological drag on the stock.

Furthermore, company insiders have been net sellers, offloading a total of 714,283 shares, valued at approximately $24.87 million, in the 90 days leading up to mid-November 2025. Insider selling is not always a red flag-people sell for personal reasons-but when the volume is this high, it's a signal that those closest to the business are taking some chips off the table.

Top Institutional Holders (Q2 2025 Data) Shares Held Approximate Value (USD) Ownership Stake (%)
Vanguard Group Inc 58,008,711 $1,798,270,000 ~9.03%
BlackRock, Inc. 38,438,606 $1,020,000,000 ~5.69%
Elliott Investment Management L.P. 28,000,000 $745,360,000 ~4.14%
Price T Rowe Associates Inc 24,140,217 $642,610,000 ~3.57%

The key takeaway for you is that while the core foundation is stable with the passive giants, the active money is consistently re-evaluating its position. You should monitor the next 13F filings for Q4 2025 to see if the net selling trend continues. That will tell you if the market is losing faith in the monetization story that drove Q3 2025 revenue of $1,049 million and GAAP net income of $92 million.

Market Impact and Investor Sentiment

You're looking at Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) right now and seeing a mixed signal, which is defintely the right read. The headline is that institutional money remains heavily invested, but recent insider selling and a post-earnings stock plunge show a clear tension between long-term belief and near-term execution risk. Institutional ownership sits at a massive 88.81% of the stock, which signals strong, underlying confidence from the big players like Vanguard Group Inc. and BlackRock, Inc..

But here's the quick math on the risk: corporate insiders, the people who know the company best, sold approximately 714,283 shares worth about $24.87 million in the 90 days leading up to November 2025. That kind of insider exit casts a shadow on the institutional optimism. Plus, the high-profile ARK ETFs recently sold off a significant block, shedding $50.2 million worth of shares in November 2025, shifting their focus elsewhere.

  • Institutional Ownership: 88.81% of shares.
  • Insider Selling (90 days): Approximately $24.87 million.
  • Key Institutional Buyer: Whittier Trust Co. increased holdings by 798.4% in Q1 2025.

You have to weigh the conviction of the long-only funds against the caution of the insiders and the tactical exits by some growth-focused funds. It's a tug-of-war between value and momentum.

Recent Market Reactions and Volatility

The stock market's reaction to Pinterest, Inc.'s news in 2025 has been dramatic and swift, underscoring the platform's high volatility. The most recent and painful reaction came in November 2025, when the stock plunged over 20% following a Q3 earnings report that included soft guidance for the critical holiday quarter. This wasn't the only dip; in August 2025, shares fell 11% in after-hours trading after the Q2 earnings per share (EPS) of 33 cents missed Wall Street's expectation of 35 cents, even though revenue of $998 million was actually ahead of estimates.

But the year wasn't all bad news. Back in February 2025, the stock saw an impressive one-day surge of 18.32%. This was largely driven by an analyst upgrade from Monness Crespi, which set an optimistic $40 price target, and market speculation that a potential TikTok ban in the U.S. could funnel users and ad dollars to rival platforms like Pinterest, Inc.. The stock's current price of around $25.52 (as of November 2025) reflects the recent, more negative sentiment, but it also suggests a potential undervaluation, especially when you consider long-term cash flow models.

Analyst Perspectives: The Case for a Moderate Buy

Despite the recent volatility and the stock's year-to-date decline of 15.7%, the broader analyst community maintains a consensus rating of 'Moderate Buy'. This isn't a 'Strong Buy,' but it's far from a 'Hold' or 'Sell,' suggesting that the Street sees the recent dips as a buying opportunity, not a fundamental breakdown. The average price target from analysts sits at $39.55, which implies a significant potential upside from the current trading price. UBS analyst Stephen Ju, for instance, maintained a Buy rating and raised his price target to a Street-high of $51.00 in October 2025.

The bullish case is grounded in the company's financial health and growth trajectory. Analysts expect Pinterest, Inc.'s fiscal 2025 Earnings Per Share (EPS) to be around $0.61, which would represent a strong 41.9% annual increase. The platform also hit a record 600 million Global Monthly Active Users (MAUs), a 12% year-over-year increase. This user growth, coupled with a strong net margin of 48.99%, highlights the company's profitability and its successful pivot to an AI-driven, personalized shopping destination. For a deeper dive into the company's core profitability, you should check out Breaking Down Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) Financial Health: Key Insights for Investors.

Here's a snapshot of the recent analyst activity and price targets, which shows the near-term caution but long-term belief:

Date Analyst/Firm Action New Price Target
Oct 9, 2025 UBS (Stephen Ju) Maintained Buy, Raised Target $51.00
Nov 5, 2025 JPMorgan Chase & Co. Decreased Target, Overweight $36.00
Nov 5, 2025 Guggenheim Decreased Target, Buy $38.00
Nov 5, 2025 Bank of America Reduced Target, Buy $39.00

The key takeaway is that the core business is working, but the market is punishing any perceived softness in the near-term outlook. The average price target of $39.55 suggests that if the company can deliver on its AI-driven monetization strategy, the stock has substantial room to run.

DCF model

Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) DCF Excel Template

    5-Year Financial Model

    40+ Charts & Metrics

    DCF & Multiple Valuation

    Free Email Support


Disclaimer

All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.

We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site—including articles or product references—constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.

All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.