|
Shenzhen Feima International Supply Chain Co., Ltd. (002210.SZ): SWOT Analysis [Dec-2025 Updated] |
Fully Editable: Tailor To Your Needs In Excel Or Sheets
Professional Design: Trusted, Industry-Standard Templates
Investor-Approved Valuation Models
MAC/PC Compatible, Fully Unlocked
No Expertise Is Needed; Easy To Follow
Shenzhen Feima International Supply Chain Co., Ltd. (002210.SZ) Bundle
Shenzhen Feima International Supply Chain Co., Ltd. has transformed from a distressed logistics player into a high‑margin new‑energy specialist-boasting robust gross and operating margins and a markedly healthier balance sheet-yet its small revenue base, extreme market valuation and reliance on a single segment leave it exposed; with China's booming circular‑economy and carbon markets offering clear growth avenues, the company's strategic bets on waste‑to‑energy, digitalization and asset monetization could pay off if it navigates fierce incumbents, tightening environmental rules and policy volatility.
Shenzhen Feima International Supply Chain Co., Ltd. (002210.SZ) - SWOT Analysis: Strengths
High profitability in new energy operations drives the company's core earnings and margin profile. As of Q2 2025 the firm reported a gross margin of 40.03% versus an industry average of ~28.05%, an operating margin of 25.29%, and a quarterly net profit of 3.30 million CNY for June 2025. Trailing twelve-month (TTM) net profit margin stands at 5.002%, materially higher than many traditional logistics peers. These margins are delivered from a lean workforce of 240 full‑time employees (December 2025), enabling high revenue and profit per employee metrics.
| Metric | Value | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 40.03% | Q2 2025 |
| Industry avg. gross margin | 28.05% | Q2 2025 |
| Operating margin | 25.29% | Q2 2025 |
| Net profit (quarter) | 3.30 million CNY | June 2025 quarter |
| TTM net profit margin | 5.002% | TTM through Q2 2025 |
| Full‑time employees | 240 | Dec 2025 |
Successful financial restructuring and deleveraging have materially improved solvency and liquidity metrics. Debt reduction, improved asset stability and positive liquidity ratios support continued investment in environmental projects and reduce refinancing risk.
| Balance sheet / liquidity metric | Value | Notes / Period |
|---|---|---|
| Debt‑to‑equity ratio | 0.71 | Dec 2025 |
| Total debt (TTM) | 6.23 million USD | TTM through Dec 2025 |
| Total assets | 198.28 million USD | Dec 2025 |
| Quick ratio | 1.31 | Dec 2025 |
| Current ratio | 1.47 | Dec 2025 |
| Market capitalization | ~11.41 billion CNY | Mid‑2025 |
- Comprehensive debt restructuring implemented to convert crisis liabilities into manageable obligations.
- Improved liquidity cushions operational cash needs for ongoing projects in waste‑to‑energy and solid waste treatment.
- Asset stabilization supports capital planning and investor confidence (total assets: 198.28M USD).
Strategic positioning in environmental services provides integrated value capture across waste collection, treatment, and energy recovery. The company focuses on solid waste renewable resources (e.g., straw) and waste‑to‑power generation, leveraging circular‑economy industrial parks and long‑term partnerships with global mining and smelting firms.
| Strategic asset / metric | Value | Period / Note |
|---|---|---|
| Retained earnings | 52.68 million CNY | Late 2025 |
| Enterprise value | 1.53 billion USD | Q3 2025 |
| Core segments | Waste‑to‑energy, solid waste treatment, logistics integration | Ongoing |
| Circular‑economy industrial parks | Portfolio with long‑term partnerships | Late 2025 |
- Integrated logistics and environmental services enable margin preservation and cross‑segment synergies.
- Retained earnings (52.68M CNY) provide internal funding for capex and project expansion.
- Established partnerships with large mining/smelting enterprises support feedstock supply and offtake stability.
Shenzhen Feima International Supply Chain Co., Ltd. (002210.SZ) - SWOT Analysis: Weaknesses
The company exhibits stagnant revenue growth and limited scale despite historically high gross margins. Net sales for the fiscal year ending December 2024 declined by 33.14% to 236.10 million CNY. Trailing twelve-month (TTM) revenue as of September 2025 stood at 25.70 million USD (≈184.80 million CNY at an exchange rate of 7.2 CNY/USD), a low absolute level for a listed supply chain player. The firm reported six consecutive quarters of negative net income through mid-2025. The five-year average annual sales growth rate is -4.55%, indicating persistent contraction rather than recovery.
| Metric | Value | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Net Sales | 236.10 million CNY | FY2024 |
| TTM Revenue | 25.70 million USD (≈184.80 million CNY) | Sep 2025 |
| Consecutive Loss Quarters | 6 quarters | Through mid-2025 |
| 5-year Average Sales Growth | -4.55% p.a. | 2019-2024 |
Extreme valuation metrics and market volatility create investor risk and signal a disconnect between share price and fundamentals. As of December 2025, the trailing twelve-month price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio was 1,058.88 and the price-to-book (P/B) ratio was 22.64, against a book value per share of 0.36 CNY. High retail ownership (59% held by individual investors) amplifies price sensitivity and liquidity swings; the stock dropped 4.7% in one week during July 2025, demonstrating short-term volatility risk for minority shareholders.
| Valuation / Market Metrics | Value | Reference Date |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 1,058.88 | Dec 2025 |
| Price-to-Book (P/B) | 22.64 | Dec 2025 |
| Book Value per Share | 0.36 CNY | Dec 2025 |
| Retail Ownership | 59% | 2025 |
| Largest 1-week Drop | -4.7% | July 2025 |
Revenue concentration in the new energy segment and low capital efficiency constrain scalability and shareholder returns. The legacy supply chain business is contracting in volume while revenue dependency shifts toward nascent new energy activities that have yet to demonstrate sustainable profitability. Return on capital employed (ROCE) was 2.92% and return on equity (ROE) was -0.53% in H1 2025, indicating poor conversion of assets and equity into earnings. Operating profit growth averaged 14.90% over five years, but management commentary and margin patterns indicate this improvement is driven primarily by cost reduction rather than meaningful top-line expansion.
- ROCE: 2.92% (H1 2025)
- ROE: -0.53% (H1 2025)
- 5-year Avg Operating Profit Growth: 14.90% (cost-driven)
- Employees: 240 (limited human capital for global expansion)
- Business Concentration: Heavy reliance on new energy segment
The small workforce (240 employees) limits operational bandwidth for scaling international logistics, business development, and compliance functions necessary for large cross-border supply-chain contracts. Combined with a thin asset base and limited capital efficiency, the company faces elevated execution risk when attempting to expand service offerings or geographic footprint.
| Operational / Capital Structure | Value | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 240 | 2025 headcount |
| ROCE | 2.92% | H1 2025 |
| ROE | -0.53% | H1 2025 |
| 5-year Avg Operating Profit Growth | 14.90% | 2019-2024 (cost-led) |
| Revenue Dependency | High on new energy segment | 2025 |
Shenzhen Feima International Supply Chain Co., Ltd. (002210.SZ) - SWOT Analysis: Opportunities
Expansion in China circular economy market presents a sizable addressable market: the global waste-to-energy market is valued at USD 44.24 billion in 2025 with a projected CAGR of 7.1% through 2033. China accounts for >60% of global waste-to-energy installed capacity and processes roughly 250 million tons of municipal and industrial solid waste annually. Government mandates target an incineration rate of approximately 65% for municipal solid waste by 2025, creating near-term capacity expansion demand aligned with the company's existing straw-to-power and solid waste treatment assets.
The following table summarizes key market and policy metrics relevant to Feima's domestic growth strategy.
| Metric | Value / Year | Relevance to Feima |
| Global waste-to-energy market | USD 44.24 billion (2025) | Large, growing TAM for technology and services |
| CAGR (2025-2033) | 7.1% | Sustained long-term growth |
| China share of global WtE capacity | >60% | Dominant domestic market presence |
| Annual waste processed in China | ~250 million tons | Feedstock pool for Feima's facilities |
| Municipal MSW incineration target | ~65% by 2025 | Regulatory driver for new projects |
Strategic initiatives and potential capture scenarios:
- Target incremental market share: capturing 0.5-2.0% of national waste volumes (1.25-5.0 million tons/year) through asset expansion and M&A.
- Technology diversification: invest in biochemical conversion (anaerobic digestion, pyrolysis, gasification bioconversion) to expand beyond thermal incineration and access higher-value outputs (biogas, biofuels, chemical feedstocks).
- CapEx prioritization: reallocate capital toward projects with shorter payback and higher gate-fees/energy revenue to exploit 2024-2026 policy windows.
Monetization of carbon emission credits is a tangible near- to medium-term revenue lever. China's Voluntary Emission Reduction (CCER) market reactivation and the national ETS make carbon assets tradable; waste incineration projects reduce methane emissions relative to landfilling (methane ≈25x GWP of CO2 over 100 years), enabling substantial credit generation. Company alignment with national carbon peak (2030) and carbon neutrality (2060) goals increases policy support and off-take interest from corporates needing offsets.
Estimated financial impact and sensitivities:
| Parameter | Assumption / Range | Estimated impact |
| IRR uplift from carbon credits | 1.8-2.2 percentage points (company estimate) | Improves project bankability and lowers WACC |
| Carbon price (China ETS / CCER) | Variable; scenario: CNY 100-300/ton CO2e | Material swing in annual EBITDA per project |
| Credit volumes | Dependent on landfill avoidance: tons CO2e per ton waste | Significant for projects replacing landfills |
Recommended actions to monetize carbon assets:
- Register existing and pipeline projects under CCER/national frameworks to monetize avoided methane and CO2 emissions.
- Develop internal carbon accounting and verification capabilities to accelerate certification and revenue recognition.
- Pursue forward sale contracts or swap structures to hedge carbon price volatility and improve project finance metrics.
Digitalization of supply chain services provides operational and commercial upside. Feima's non-ferrous metals e-commerce and logistics operations can gain efficiency and revenue by integrating 5G-enabled smart warehousing, AI-assisted waste sorting, IoT asset tracking, and advanced trading execution tools. The company reported a -35.44% sales decline in its supply chain segment over the last year; targeted digital investments can help reverse this trend and reduce labor and logistics costs long term.
Key digital initiatives and expected benefits:
| Initiative | Expected outcome | KPIs |
| 5G smart warehousing + robotics | Increase throughput; reduce labor costs | Throughput +15-30%; labor cost -20-40% |
| AI-assisted waste sorting | Higher recovery rates; improved feedstock quality | Metal recovery +5-12%; contamination down 10-25% |
| Digital trading platform upgrades | Faster execution; expanded buyer network | Sell-side lead time -30-50%; GM expanded 2-6 ppt |
Partnership and execution roadmap:
- Form strategic alliances with technology vendors (AI vision, robotics, 5G integrators) leveraging Shenzhen-based ecosystem.
- Pilot smart-warehouse and AI-sorting at one or two high-volume sites within 12 months, measure ROI at 6-12 months post-deployment.
- Allocate targeted capex (example: CNY 30-80 million per major site) and track payback periods under conservative throughput and cost-savings scenarios.
Shenzhen Feima International Supply Chain Co., Ltd. (002210.SZ) - SWOT Analysis: Threats
The waste-to-energy and integrated supply chain markets present several external threats that could materially affect Feima International's operational performance and financial position in the near to medium term.
Intense competition from industry leaders reduces Feima's market access and bidding success. Major competitors and scale metrics (2025):
| Competitor | Key Metric (2025) | Implication for Feima |
|---|---|---|
| Everbright Environment | Large national portfolio; market-leading EPC and O&M contracts | Price and capability pressure on municipal concession bids |
| SUS Environment | Operates >300 incineration plants; daily treatment capacity >300,000 tonnes | Economies of scale; superior feedstock sourcing and bargaining power |
| International (Veolia) | Expanding hazardous waste capacity +530,000 tonnes/year | Advanced hazardous-waste solutions and cross-border clients |
| Martin Grate Technology (global metric) | Processes ~262,612 tonnes/day globally | Proprietary tech advantage; lower unit costs for large operators |
Specific competitive threats include:
- Being outbid for municipal solid waste (MSW) concessions and PPP projects due to smaller scale and weaker financing terms.
- Loss of supplier or offtake leverage versus conglomerates that can secure long-term waste streams at lower prices.
- Pressure on margins from incumbents with vertically integrated logistics, treatment and energy-offtake capabilities.
Regulatory shifts in renewable subsidies and tightening emissions standards increase operating risk and capital requirements. Recent policy trends and impacts:
| Regulatory Element | 2024-2025 Trend | Impact on Feima |
|---|---|---|
| Subsidy model | Shift toward subsidy-free parity for renewable power | Revenue risk for older plants; potential LCOE gap requiring efficiency investments |
| Electricity tariff for waste-to-power | Regional variations; downward pressure in pilot subsidy-free zones | Compressed EBITDA margins; need for renegotiated offtake agreements |
| Emission standards (dioxins, heavy metals) | Stricter limits from Ministry of Ecology and Environment | CapEx for retrofits; penalty risk and license suspension if non-compliant |
| Waste composition variability | Divergent calorific values across regions | Inconsistent energy yield; higher maintenance and auxiliary fuel costs |
Regulatory-related exposures in quantified terms (illustrative estimates based on sector data):
- Potential incremental CapEx to meet new emission standards: RMB 50-300 million per older plant depending on scale.
- Possible EBITDA compression from tariff shifts: 5-20% for legacy facilities if subsidy is removed without compensatory market price.
- Fines and downtime risk: single non-compliance event can cause fines up to RMB 10-50 million and suspension of operations for weeks to months.
Macroeconomic and trade-policy risks threaten project finance, input costs and volumes. Key macro drivers and quantified exposures:
| Risk Category | 2025 Indicators | Impact on Feima |
|---|---|---|
| Commodity price volatility | Coal and non-ferrous metals price swings; example: thermal coal spot moved ±20% y/y | Higher logistics and substitute fuel costs; margin volatility in supply chain services |
| Trade policy uncertainty | US-China tariffs and customs policy changes; episodic clearance delays | Delays and higher costs in import-export logistics; working capital strain |
| Manufacturing demand | China Industrial Production and PMI volatility through 2025 (monthly PMI range 49-51) | Reduced demand for industrial supply-chain services; lower volumes handled |
| Interest rates & financing | Rising rates increase debt service costs; long-term project debt vulnerable | Higher WACC; constraint on funding capital-intensive waste-to-energy projects |
| Urbanization slowdown | Lower municipal MSW growth projections reduce feedstock availability | Underutilization risk for plants designed for higher throughput |
Operational and financial consequences include:
- Increased cost of capital: a 1 percentage point rise in borrowing rates could raise annual interest expense by tens of millions RMB on large projects.
- Revenue sensitivity: a 10% decline in MSW volumes or power tariffs may reduce consolidated revenues materially-single-project IRR can flip negative for marginal concessions.
- Supply chain disruptions: customs delays and higher commodity costs can increase working capital days and compress gross margins by several percentage points.
Mitigation will require proactive bidding strategy, technology upgrades for emission compliance, diversified revenue streams, and conservative leverage; failure to address these threats heightens short- and medium-term downside risk to Feima International's growth and profitability.
Disclaimer
All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.
We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site—including articles or product references—constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.
All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.