Shanghai Chicmax Cosmetic Co., Ltd. (2145.HK): BCG Matrix

Shanghai Chicmax Cosmetic Co., Ltd. (2145.HK): BCG Matrix [Dec-2025 Updated]

CN | Consumer Defensive | Household & Personal Products | HKSE
Shanghai Chicmax Cosmetic Co., Ltd. (2145.HK): BCG Matrix

Fully Editable: Tailor To Your Needs In Excel Or Sheets

Professional Design: Trusted, Industry-Standard Templates

Investor-Approved Valuation Models

MAC/PC Compatible, Fully Unlocked

No Expertise Is Needed; Easy To Follow

Shanghai Chicmax Cosmetic Co., Ltd. (2145.HK) Bundle

Get Full Bundle:
$9 $7
$9 $7
$9 $7
$9 $7
$25 $15
$9 $7
$9 $7
$9 $7
$9 $7

TOTAL:

Shanghai Chicmax's portfolio is starkly polarized: Kans is a runaway star fueling rapid digital-led growth and high margins, while Red Elephant and the mature offline network generate the steady cash needed to bankroll aggressive investment in high-potential bets like New Page and One Leaf-even as legacy sheet masks and tiny color brands drain resources and face likely divestment; how management balances reinvesting in winners, scaling promising challengers, and pruning underperformers will determine whether Chicmax converts current momentum into sustainable market leadership.

Shanghai Chicmax Cosmetic Co., Ltd. (2145.HK) - BCG Matrix Analysis: Stars

Kans dominates the Douyin skincare market, contributing approximately 82% of total group revenue in 2025. In the first half of 2025 Kans reported year‑on‑year revenue growth of 120%, materially outpacing the broader beauty market growth of 5%. The brand's gross profit margin reached 77.5%, generating large internal cashflow to fund rapid customer acquisition and marketing intensity. Kans maintains a category market share above 4.5% in Douyin skincare, supported by expanded digital infrastructure and scale operations.

Capital expenditure to support digital sales capacity-primarily live‑streaming studios, content production, and e‑commerce integration-increased by 15% year‑over‑year to accommodate surge volumes and conversion rates. High conversion metrics and repeat purchase rates on Douyin enable Kans to sustain heavy marketing spend while maintaining strong unit economics.

Metric Value (2025 / H1 where noted)
Share of Group Revenue (Kans) 82%
Kans H1 YoY Revenue Growth 120%
Beauty Market Growth (benchmark) 5%
Gross Profit Margin (Kans) 77.5%
Douyin Skincare Market Share (Kans) >4.5%
CAPEX Increase (digital infrastructure) +15%
Live‑streaming Order Volume Growth +140% YoY (platform internal)

The Kans Red Pro series is the premium engine within the star portfolio, capturing ~12% share of the domestic anti‑aging set market. The anti‑aging segment expanded to ~150 billion RMB in 2025, where Kans's Red Pro maintains a high growth trajectory (reported at ~95% growth for the line). Marketing spend for Red Pro yields an estimated return on marketing investment (ROMI) of 3.2x, indicating strong product‑market fit and customer willingness to pay upmarket prices.

R&D investment targeted at proprietary Tiracle ingredient equals roughly 3.5% of total company revenue, underpinning product differentiation and patentable claims. The operating margin for the Red Pro high‑end line is estimated at 22%, materially above commodity lines and contributing disproportionately to overall corporate profitability.

Premium Line KPI Red Pro Series
Share of Anti‑Aging Set Market 12%
Anti‑Aging Segment Size (China) 150,000,000,000 RMB
Red Pro YoY Growth ~95%
ROMI (Marketing ROI) 3.2x
R&D Spend on Tiracle (as % of Revenue) 3.5%
Operating Margin (Red Pro) 22%
Average Selling Price (ASP) Premium vs Core +180% ASP premium

Strategic implications and operational priorities for Kans as a Star:

  • Reinvest high gross profits into scaled live‑streaming capacity, influencer partnerships, and platform promotions.
  • Prioritize CAPEX for redundancy and peak‑traffic handling to protect conversion during campaigns.
  • Allocate a portion of cashflow to R&D (Tiracle) to sustain premium line differentiation and patent pipeline.
  • Maintain aggressive ROMI targets for Red Pro while testing price‑tier expansions to capture more of the 150bn RMB anti‑aging market.
  • Monitor Douyin policy and channel concentration risk; diversify digital channels incrementally while preserving Douyin leadership.

Shanghai Chicmax Cosmetic Co., Ltd. (2145.HK) - BCG Matrix Analysis: Cash Cows

Cash Cows

Red Elephant leads the domestic baby segment. Red Elephant remains the leading domestic brand in the Chinese mother and baby care market with a stable market share of approximately 5.8%. The market is mature with a CAGR near 3% currently, and the brand contributes ~7% to total corporate revenue. Net profit margin for Red Elephant is approximately 18%, CAPEX requirements are minimal at ~2% of brand revenue, and return on assets (ROA) is ~14%, indicating high capital efficiency for this mature business unit.

Offline retail distribution provides steady liquidity. The group's offline distribution network covers over 50,000 points of sale and accounts for roughly 10% of total company sales. Gross margin for these legacy channels averages 65%. Offline market growth has plateaued at ~2% annually, while assets for these channels are largely fully depreciated, producing attractive returns and a cash conversion cycle under 40 days. The company allocates less than 5% of total marketing spend to offline, preserving free cash flow for higher-growth brands.

Metric Red Elephant Offline Retail Distribution Company Aggregate (for context)
Market share (domestic baby) 5.8% n/a -
Revenue contribution 7% of corporate revenue 10% of total sales 100%
Market growth (segment) 3% CAGR 2% CAGR Overall company ~6-8% (mixed)
Net profit margin 18% Not directly reported; gross margin 65% Company net margin ~10-12%
Gross margin ~55-60% (brand-level) 65% Company weighted avg ~58%
ROA 14% High but not separately disclosed Company ROA ~9-11%
CAPEX intensity 2% of Red Elephant revenue Minimal; legacy assets largely depreciated Total CAPEX ~6-8% of revenue
Marketing allocation Targeted promotional spend; <5% of corporate marketing <5% of corporate marketing Company marketing spend ~12-15% of revenue
Cash conversion cycle ~35-45 days <40 days ~50-60 days

Operational and financial implications for cash management:

  • Stable free cash flow from Red Elephant supports funding of Stars and Question Marks without immediate equity raises.
  • Low CAPEX and high ROA make Red Elephant an efficient internal funding source.
  • High gross margins and fully depreciated offline assets boost short-term liquidity and reduce working-capital strain.
  • Conservative marketing spend on legacy channels preserves cash for high-burn digital customer acquisition for growth brands.
  • Short cash conversion cycles enable rapid redeployment of cash into product development and channel expansion.

Risk considerations tied to Cash Cow stability:

  • Segment maturity and low market growth (2-3%) limit upside; reliance on cost efficiency rather than volume expansion.
  • Brand dependency concentration: if Red Elephant market share erodes, a large portion of predictable cash flow could be at risk.
  • Offline channel secular decline risk over multi-year horizon; continued profitability depends on cost discipline and selective reinvestment.
  • Inflationary pressure on input costs could compress margins, reducing available internal funding for Stars and Question Marks.

Shanghai Chicmax Cosmetic Co., Ltd. (2145.HK) - BCG Matrix Analysis: Question Marks

Dogs - Question Marks

New Page targets the sensitive skincare niche. New Page is positioned in a high-growth segment (sensitive skin market growing at ~20% CAGR in China). It currently contributes less than 2% of group revenue but recorded a 150% increase in sales volume over the last 12 months. The brand requires substantial CAPEX for medical-grade clinical trials and professional channel expansion, frequently exceeding 40% of its own revenue. Market share remains below 0.5% within the broader dermatology-grade cosmetic segment; current return on investment (ROI) is negative due to prioritization of customer acquisition and brand awareness over short-term profitability.

One Leaf pivots toward clean beauty trends. Following strategic rebranding, One Leaf targets the clean beauty segment projected to reach RMB 15 billion by 2026. The brand's revenue contribution has stabilized around 6% after prior decline. Clean beauty market growth is estimated at 18% CAGR, yet One Leaf's market share in this niche is approximately 1.2%. The group has allocated RMB 100 million in fresh marketing capital to reposition One Leaf among Gen Z consumers. To justify continued portfolio inclusion, One Leaf must achieve sustained ~25% annual growth and improve gross margins under competitive pressure from international entrants.

Comparative metrics for the two Question Mark brands:

Metric New Page One Leaf
Segment Sensitive skincare / dermatology-grade Clean beauty / natural formulations
Segment CAGR (China) 20% per year 18% per year
Contribution to Group Revenue <2% (estimate 1.5%) 6.0%
12-month Sales Volume Change +150% Stabilized (0-5% YoY)
Market Share (relevant niche) <0.5% 1.2%
Required CAPEX / Revenue (brand-level) ~40%+ for trials & professional channels Marketing injection: RMB 100 million (one-off / FY)
Gross Margin (brand-level estimate) Low/negative currently (loss-making) Moderate, pressured by competition (estimated 35-40%)
ROI Negative (prioritizing growth) Mixed; breakeven target within 2-3 years contingent on 25% growth
Key Risks High CAPEX intensity, regulatory/clinical trial uncertainty Intense international competition, brand repositioning risk
Investment Signal (BCG) Question Mark - requires heavy investment to become Star Question Mark - requires strong growth to avoid becoming a Dog

Immediate financial and operational implications:

  • New Page requires continued high capital allocation: estimated RMB 20-40 million annually for clinical trials and professional distribution scaling (representing ~40% of its revenue base if revenue is ~RMB 50-100 million).
  • One Leaf needs targeted marketing spend efficiency: RMB 100 million allocated must generate ≥25% top-line growth and improve customer LTV to CAC ratio above 3.0 within 12-24 months.
  • Both brands currently occupy Question Mark positions: convert to Stars only if sustained market share gains justify incremental CAPEX and improve unit economics.

Operational actions under consideration:

  • Prioritize channels with higher conversion and margin: professional dermatology channels for New Page; DTC + Gen Z social commerce for One Leaf.
  • Stage-gate CAPEX for New Page tied to clinical milestone achievement and defined incremental market-share targets (e.g., 0.5% → 2% within 24 months).
  • For One Leaf, reallocate marketing spend toward influencer-driven product launches and limited-edition clean formulations to test willingness-to-pay and accelerate 25% growth target.
  • KPIs to monitor monthly: revenue growth %, gross margin %, CAC, payback period (months), market share in niche, clinical trial milestone completion, and retention / repurchase rates.

Shanghai Chicmax Cosmetic Co., Ltd. (2145.HK) - BCG Matrix Analysis: Dogs

Dogs

Legacy sheet mask product lines face decline. The legacy sheet mask segment, formerly a primary revenue driver, now operates in a market with a negative growth rate of -4.0% year-on-year. Contribution to group revenue from basic sheet masks has fallen to 2.7% (FY2024), down from 9.8% three years earlier. Gross margin on these SKUs is approximately 45.0% versus the group average of 62.5%, compressed by aggressive price competition and channel discounting. Market share for the basic mask portfolio has declined from 8.0% (FY2021) to 1.8% (FY2024). Marketing ROI has dropped below 1.1x (0.95x tracked FY2024), and the company has reduced production capacity for these lines by 30% in 2024 to reallocate resources toward higher-margin functional skincare.

MetricFY2021FY2022FY2023FY2024
Market growth rate+2.0%+0.5%-1.8%-4.0%
Revenue contribution9.8%6.0%4.2%2.7%
Gross margin52.0%49.5%46.0%45.0%
Market share (domestic basic masks)8.0%5.0%3.0%1.8%
Marketing ROI2.1x1.6x1.2x0.95x
Production capacity change--10%-20%-30%

Minor non-core color cosmetic brands struggle for scale. Several small makeup labels under the Chicmax umbrella collectively generate less than 1.0% of group sales (0.6% FY2024) in a domestic color cosmetics market growing around 4.0% annually. These sub-brands exhibit flat to negative unit volume trends (0% to -3% CAGR over 2022-2024) and report average operating losses of ~15.0% of their revenues. Aggregate market share for these minor brands is below 0.1% domestically, leaving them unable to achieve scale versus top-tier domestic players and international entrants. Management has initiated a divestment and rationalization review targeting completion in 2026 to streamline resources toward core functional skincare and higher-growth channels.

MetricValue
Group sales contribution (minor color brands)0.6% (FY2024)
Domestic color cosmetics market growth+4.0% CAGR (current)
Segment revenue CAGR (2022-2024)0% to -3%
Operating margin (average)-15.0%
Aggregate market share<0.1%
Targeted divestment timeline2026 operational focus

Immediate strategic implications and tactical actions under consideration:

  • Scale back production and inventory for basic sheet masks by an additional 15% in 2025 and redirect CAPEX toward functional skincare R&D and manufacturing.
  • Reallocate marketing budget from low-ROI legacy masks to high-ROI functional lines, targeting a minimum marketing ROI of 2.0x for reinvested spend.
  • Accelerate divestment review of non-core color brands with a decision gate in H1 2025; prepare potential asset sale or licensing structures to recover working capital.
  • Consolidate SKUs and rationalize distribution for minor cosmetic brands to reduce fixed costs and limit cash burn while exit options are explored.
  • Monitor channel profitability (e‑commerce vs. wholesale) and withdraw loss-making SKUs from low-margin channels within 12 months.

Disclaimer

All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.

We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site—including articles or product references—constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.

All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.