|
Assura Plc (AGR.L): 5 FORCES Analysis [Dec-2025 Updated] |
Fully Editable: Tailor To Your Needs In Excel Or Sheets
Professional Design: Trusted, Industry-Standard Templates
Investor-Approved Valuation Models
MAC/PC Compatible, Fully Unlocked
No Expertise Is Needed; Easy To Follow
Assura Plc (AGR.L) Bundle
Discover how Porter's Five Forces shape Assura Plc's strategic edge in the UK healthcare property market-from powerful NHS tenants and specialized contractors to rising digital substitutes and steep barriers for new entrants-revealing why Assura's scale, regulatory know‑how and targeted investments cement its position yet leave it exposed to energy costs, land scarcity and evolving care delivery; read on to see which pressures matter most and how the company responds.
Assura Plc (AGR.L) - Porter's Five Forces: Bargaining power of suppliers
DEBT CAPITAL PROVIDERS INFLUENCE FINANCIAL FLEXIBILITY: Assura relies on diverse funding sources where the average cost of debt stands at 3.3 percent as of late 2025. The company manages a total debt facility of £1.2 billion with a weighted average maturity of 6.5 years to ensure liquidity. With a loan to value (LTV) ratio maintained at 41 percent, the bargaining power of lenders is mitigated by the firm's investment grade credit rating. Interest cover remains robust at 3.8 times, providing a cushion against the 4.75 percent base rates seen in the broader UK market. These financial metrics demonstrate that while capital is essential, Assura's scale allows it to negotiate favorable terms compared to smaller developers.
| Metric | Value | Implication for Supplier Power |
|---|---|---|
| Average cost of debt | 3.3% | Lower financing costs reduce lender bargaining leverage |
| Total debt facility | £1.2bn | Scale provides negotiating leverage with banks and bond markets |
| Weighted average debt maturity | 6.5 years | Long maturity cushions refinancing risk and lender pressure |
| Loan to value (LTV) | 41% | Moderate LTV supports investment grade status and reduces lender power |
| Interest cover | 3.8x | Healthy coverage limits covenant-driven supplier leverage |
| UK base rate (market) | 4.75% | Benchmark for debt pricing; Assura below-market average cost |
CONSTRUCTION FIRMS DICTATE DEVELOPMENT COSTS AND TIMELINES: Assura currently manages a development pipeline valued at £75 million across multiple UK sites. Construction cost inflation for specialized medical facilities has stabilized at 4.5 percent annually, directly impacting project yields. The company works with a concentrated group of Tier 1 contractors who command higher margins for meeting strict NHS building standards and supplying specialized systems (ventilation, diagnostic shielding). These suppliers exert leverage over the average £15 million cost per new medical centre. To mitigate exposure, Assura enters fixed price contracts for 90 percent of its active development projects, protecting a target net initial yield of 5.1 percent.
- Development pipeline value: £75m
- Average cost per new centre: £15m
- Construction inflation: 4.5% p.a.
- Fixed-price contracts coverage: 90% of active projects
- Target net initial yield: 5.1%
| Construction Factor | Data | Effect on Supplier Power |
|---|---|---|
| Pipeline value | £75m | Concentrated spend increases negotiating importance of Tier 1 firms |
| Average project cost | £15m | High per-project spend increases contractor bargaining leverage |
| Specialized component reliance | Ventilation & diagnostic shielding (specialist suppliers) | Specialist suppliers hold pricing power and timing leverage |
| Fixed-price coverage | 90% | Mitigates cost escalation risk and contractor margin capture |
| Net initial yield protection | 5.1% | Benchmark for assessing project viability under contractor pricing |
LAND OWNERS COMMAND PREMIUMS FOR STRATEGIC LOCATIONS: Securing land for primary care centres requires proximity to patient populations, where land values have risen by 6 percent in urban areas. Assura competes with residential developers who often have higher profit margins and can offer up to 20 percent more for the same plots. The scarcity of sites designated for healthcare use allows land owners to demand premiums often representing 15 percent of total project CAPEX. Assura leverages a 20-year track record and relationships with local authorities to secure sites through planning agreements, but limited shovel-ready land constrains the firm's £3.2 billion portfolio growth strategy.
- Urban land value growth: 6%
- Residential bidder premium vs Assura: up to 20%
- Land premium as % of CAPEX: 15%
- Portfolio growth target / constraint: £3.2bn portfolio impacted by land scarcity
- Track record leveraged: 20 years of planning & authority relationships
| Land Metric | Value | Impact on Supplier Power |
|---|---|---|
| Urban land value increase | 6% | Raises acquisition costs, strengthening landowner bargaining position |
| Residential developer premium | 20% higher bids | Competitive pressure forces Assura to pay premiums or seek alternatives |
| Land premium share of CAPEX | 15% | Material impact on project economics and supplier leverage |
| Shovel-ready scarcity | High | Limits deal flow and enhances landowner negotiating power |
ENERGY AND UTILITY PROVIDERS IMPACT OPERATIONAL OVERHEADS: As a REIT, Assura is responsible for the environmental performance of its 612 properties to meet EPC B ratings by 2030. Utility suppliers have increased commercial rates by 12 percent over the last two years, affecting service charge recovery ratios and operating margins. Assura is investing £5 million annually into solar PV and heat pump retrofitting to reduce dependency on external energy suppliers. Currently 35 percent of the portfolio requires upgrades to meet upcoming UK environmental regulations. By generating a portion of its own power, Assura aims to reduce exposure to a volatile wholesale energy market where prices can fluctuate by 20 percent annually.
- Number of properties: 612
- Utility rate increase (2 years): 12%
- Annual sustainability investment: £5m
- Portfolio needing upgrades: 35%
- Wholesale energy price volatility: ±20%
- Target EPC rating deadline: EPC B by 2030
| Energy/Utility Metric | Value | Relevance to Supplier Power |
|---|---|---|
| Properties under management | 612 | Scale creates bargaining scope but also large exposure to utility pricing |
| Commercial utility rate increase | 12% | Raises operating costs and strengthens supplier influence |
| Annual retrofit spend | £5m | Investment reduces long-term supplier dependence |
| Portfolio requiring upgrades | 35% | Immediate capex need increases short-term supplier vulnerability |
| Wholesale price volatility | 20% fluctuation | Creates operational risk that drives self-generation strategies |
MITIGATION STRATEGIES EMPLOYED BY ASSURA TO REDUCE SUPPLIER BARGAINING POWER:
- Diversified debt mix (banks, bonds, facilities) with LTV at 41% and average cost of debt 3.3% to limit lender leverage.
- Fixed-price construction contracts covering 90% of active projects to cap build-cost exposure and protect a 5.1% net initial yield.
- Long-term relationships and planning track record (20 years) to access land through negotiated agreements and reduce auctions to market-rate sellers.
- Sustainability capex (£5m p.a.) and on-site generation (solar PV, heat pumps) to lower energy supplier dependence and insulate against 20% price volatility.
- Portfolio-level prioritisation to target shovel-ready acquisitions and joint-venture structures to share land and construction supplier risk.
Assura Plc (AGR.L) - Porter's Five Forces: Bargaining power of customers
NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE DOMINANCE LIMITS RENTAL GROWTH: The NHS and GP practitioners account for approximately 80% of Assura's £151.0m annual rent roll (c. £120.8m). Leases backed by government funding imply an historic default rate below 0.1%, effectively eliminating credit risk for the majority of cashflows. However, rent review mechanics materially constrain upside: reviews are commonly capped or linked to RPI with an effective 3.0% ceiling on uplifts. The portfolio's weighted average unexpired lease term (WAULT) of 11.2 years (to break) locks in these contractual rates and slows reversionary potential. Assura's 612-property portfolio must meet NHS England clinical and estate specifications, which increases tenant bargaining leverage by defining acceptable asset utility and fit-out standards.
| Metric | Value | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rent roll | £151.0m | As reported; ~80% from NHS/GPs (~£120.8m) |
| WAULT (years) | 11.2 | Weighted average unexpired lease term to break |
| Portfolio size | 612 properties | Includes primary care centres and community assets |
| Historical tenant default rate | <0.1% | NHS-backed leases |
| Typical rent review cap | RPI, effective 3.0% ceiling | Limits upward pressure on rents |
PRIVATE HEALTHCARE OPERATORS PROVIDE REVENUE DIVERSIFICATION: Assura's £250.0m acquisition of 14 private hospital assets diversified tenant mix; private operators (e.g., Ramsay Health Care) represent c.15% of total portfolio value as of December 2025. Private healthcare tenants sign larger, multi-site leases-often exceeding £10.0m in annual rent per counterparty-and have stronger negotiating leverage in contract structure, but their leases commonly include fixed annual uplifts (typical 2.5% per annum), providing predictable cashflow growth versus NHS review cycles. This private segment supports a consolidated occupancy rate of c.99.4% and reduces single-payor concentration risk from ~80% to a lower effective exposure.
- Private tenant share of portfolio value: 15% (Dec 2025)
- Acquisition cost of private hospitals: £250.0m
- Typical private lease uplift: 2.5% p.a. fixed
- Large counterparty annual rent exposure: >£10.0m
GP PARTNERSHIPS RETAIN LOCAL LEVERAGE DURING RENEWALS: Individual GP practices occupy c.70% of Assura's medical centres and exert material local bargaining power at lease expiry. When facing relocation threats, GPs can push for landlord-funded refurbishments or migration into Integrated Care Hubs; Assura historically funds up to 100% of primary care refit costs to retain tenants. Average primary care fit-out cost has reached c.£1,200 per m2. With ~5% of leases maturing within the next 24 months, Assura must balance CAPEX deployment against the objective of preserving a 100% rent collection record and stable occupancy.
| GP-related metric | Value | Implication |
|---|---|---|
| Share of medical centres occupied by GPs | 70% | High local tenant concentration |
| Leases expiring (24 months) | 5% | Near-term renewal risk |
| Average primary care fit-out cost | £1,200/m² | Typical landlord CAPEX to retain tenants |
| Rent collection | 100% | Historic record to date |
INTEGRATED CARE BOARDS INFLUENCE REGIONAL PROPERTY STRATEGY: Integrated Care Boards (ICBs) control health and care budgets across 42 English regions and direct reimbursements that underpin rent payments. ICBs' strategic preference for larger facilities (≥1,500 m2) has driven portfolio composition changes; such larger assets now represent c.45% of Assura's portfolio by area/value. ICB consolidation initiatives can create obsolescence risk for smaller assets-management estimates up to a 10% vacancy risk in older, smaller centres if consolidation accelerates. Assura addresses this by aligning its £75.0m development pipeline with ICB five-year strategic estate plans, targeting new assets that secure 20-year lease commitments and thereby support valuation underpinned by long-dated contracted income.
- Number of ICB regions: 42
- Share of portfolio ≥1,500 m²: 45%
- Estimated vacancy risk for smaller assets under consolidation: 10%
- Development pipeline aligned to ICB plans: £75.0m
- Target lease length for new developments: 20 years
Customer bargaining-power synthesis (quantitative indicators): The dominance of NHS/GPs (c.80% rent roll) and long WAULT (11.2 years) produce low credit risk but cap rent growth (RPI/3.0% ceilings). Private healthcare exposure (15% value) and fixed 2.5% uplifts improve predictability. Local GP leverage forces recurring landlord CAPEX (avg. £1,200/m²) and creates renewal pressure with 5% of leases maturing in 24 months. ICB-driven estate rationalisation concentrates demand toward larger assets (45% ≥1,500 m²) but poses a potential 10% vacancy risk for smaller assets absent proactive redevelopment and alignment with ICB plans.
Assura Plc (AGR.L) - Porter's Five Forces: Competitive rivalry
Direct competition with Primary Health Properties (PHP) defines the competitive rivalry in the UK primary healthcare REIT sector. PHP holds a comparable portfolio valued at roughly £2.8bn; together PHP and Assura control a market that exceeds 1,100 specialized medical facilities. Intense bidding for scarce new-build opportunities has compressed net initial yields to approximately 5.1%. Assura's strategic £250m acquisition of private hospital assets represents a deliberate pivot away from head-to-head contests in the saturated GP surgery market as it pursues scale targets: management guidance aims for a £3.5bn portfolio valuation by FY2026.
| Metric | Assura | Primary Health Properties | Market/Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Portfolio value | Target £3.5bn (FY2026) | ~£2.8bn | Combined ownership >1,100 facilities |
| Net initial yield (new builds) | ~5.1% | ~5.1% | Compressed by bidding pressure |
| Recent strategic acquisition | £250m private hospital assets | N/A | De-risks competition in GP surgery market |
| Occupancy | 99.4% | ~98-99% (sector) | High operational occupancy |
Institutional capital inflows have intensified rivalry by elevating asset pricing. Large institutional investors and pension funds allocated approximately £1.5bn to UK healthcare real estate in the past year, frequently targeting stable ~5% yields and outbidding REITs for assets in the £5m-£10m band. The increased demand has narrowed spreads to gilts to roughly 150 bps, reducing yield pick-up for healthcare assets and limiting opportunities for yield-enhancing acquisitions.
- Assura defensive actions:
- Prioritize complex development projects where internal capability yields ~10% cost advantage over pure financial buyers.
- Target larger, less-contested assets (e.g., private hospitals) to avoid crowded GP surgery auctions.
- Maintain high occupancy and long-term leases to sustain income stability.
- Market effects:
- Compressed acquisition spreads (~150 bps vs gilts).
- Fewer distressed opportunities; competition skewed to well-capitalized investors.
Consolidation among smaller healthcare REITs is accelerating. Entities with portfolios under £500m are being absorbed to achieve scale economies and reduce administrative costs. Assura reports an EPRA cost ratio of 11.5%, below the sub-scale competitors who often operate at ~15% cost ratios. Market share metrics show Assura holding approximately 18% of privately owned GP surgeries, with ~2% annual growth in this share driven by acquisitions and organic development.
| Consolidation metric | Assura | Smaller REITs | Target/Benchmark |
|---|---|---|---|
| EPRA cost ratio | 11.5% | ~15% | Target <12% for scale efficiency |
| Market share of private GP surgeries | ~18% | Varies (majority <1% each) | Assura +2% p.a. growth |
| Annual development spend | ~£75m | Typically <£20m | Supports pipeline and growth |
Regional developers remain a significant competitive force for local clinic projects. These smaller builders secure about 30% of new primary care schemes by leveraging established relationships with GP federations and planning authorities. Their lower overhead structures enable delivery speeds roughly 15% faster on typical projects, especially in the £2m-£5m range where local familiarity and cost control matter most.
- Assura countermeasures vs regional developers:
- Offer full life-cycle solutions (development, financing, long-term property management) that regional players cannot match.
- Leverage national tenant relationships and credit-strength leases to secure long-term income and high occupancy.
- Use in-house development capability to match or exceed speed while delivering scale-driven cost benefits.
- Continued threats:
- Regional players capture a persistent share (~30%) of smaller projects (£2m-£5m).
- Local ties and faster delivery can undercut REIT bids on select schemes.
Key quantitative indicators shaping rivalry dynamics include: combined sector portfolio (>1,100 facilities), net initial yield pressure (~5.1%), institutional inflows (~£1.5bn), yield spread to gilts (~150 bps), Assura occupancy (99.4%), EPRA cost ratio (11.5%), annual development spend (~£75m), Assura market share (~18%) and consolidation threshold (~£500m portfolios).
Assura Plc (AGR.L) - Porter's Five Forces: Threat of substitutes
The threat of substitutes for Assura's primary care and diagnostic real estate is growing, driven by digital healthcare adoption, expanded pharmacy clinical roles, retail-to-healthcare conversions, and mobile diagnostic units. While Assura reports a 99% portfolio occupancy and a £3.2bn valuation, these substitution vectors could alter space demand composition and rental economics unless mitigated by targeted asset strategy and investment.
DIGITAL HEALTHCARE SERVICES CHALLENGE PHYSICAL FOOTPRINTS
Remote consultations now account for 25% of UK GP appointments, exerting downward pressure on demand for small-format surgeries (circa 500 sqm). Assura's countermeasure is a targeted capital deployment: a £100m investment program into larger integrated diagnostic centres that provide complex, high-acuity services that cannot be replicated online (e.g., MRI). MRI demand across the UK has grown by ~7% year-on-year, supporting the rationale for capital allocation to services requiring clinical-grade physical assets. These larger centres shift Assura's exposure away from low-value GP surgery space toward higher-value diagnostics and outpatient procedures.
COMMUNITY PHARMACIES EXPAND INTO PRIMARY CARE ROLES
Approximately 90% of UK pharmacies now offer services such as blood pressure checks and minor ailment treatment, a trend that could divert an estimated 15% of traditional GP footfall from Assura's primary care centres. Assura has integrated 120 pharmacies within its 612-property portfolio to capture this trend and retain patient flows. On-site pharmacy rents typically command a ~20% premium per sq ft versus standard clinical space, enhancing income density and tenant mix stability.
RETAIL TO HEALTHCARE CONVERSIONS PROVIDE ALTERNATIVE SPACES
Planning applications for converting vacant retail units into diagnostic hubs rose ~12% in 2025, offering alternatives with rents ~30% below purpose-built medical centres-attractive to cost-constrained NHS trusts. However, converting retail shells to clinical grade frequently requires ~£2.0m additional CAPEX per site to meet compliance and equipment needs, creating a material barrier. Assura's purpose-built medical assets, constructed to clinical specifications, support its £3.2bn portfolio valuation by maintaining higher replacement-cost economics and limiting competitive undercutting for truly clinical functions.
MOBILE DIAGNOSTIC UNITS REDUCE PERMANENT SPACE REQUIREMENTS
Mobile MRI/CT units usage has increased ~10% as the NHS addresses elective care backlogs; these units can be deployed in hospital car parks, avoiding the need for new £20m permanent buildings. Assura has incorporated resilience into its development pipeline-designing new £75m developments with dedicated docking bays and infrastructure for mobile diagnostics-converting a potential substitute into a complementary revenue stream and preserving demand for site-based ancillary services.
COMPARATIVE METRICS: SUBSTITUTES VS ASSURA RESPONSE
| Substitute | Market Trend / Stat | Potential Impact on Assura | Assura Response / Investment | Financial Implication |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Remote consultations | 25% of GP appointments remote (UK) | Reduced demand for small 500 sqm surgeries | £100m into integrated diagnostic centres | Reallocates rent mix to higher-margin diagnostic space |
| Community pharmacies | 90% pharmacies offer clinical services | Potential 15% diversion of GP footfall | 120 pharmacies co-located in 612 properties | Rents +20% per sq ft for pharmacy units |
| Retail conversions | 12% increase in conversion planning apps (2025) | 30% lower rents than purpose-built centres | Leverage clinical-grade assets; highlight £2m CAPEX barrier | Protects £3.2bn portfolio valuation via high entry costs |
| Mobile diagnostics | Mobile MRI/CT usage +10% | Reduces need for new £20m permanent buildings | Designs £75m pipeline with docking bays for mobile units | Enables hybrid revenue from infrastructure leasing |
STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS AND OPPORTUNITIES
- Shift portfolio mix toward larger diagnostic and integrated care hubs to capture MRI/complex diagnostics growth (7% YoY MRI demand).
- Monetise pharmacy expansion by embedding premium-rent pharmacy tenants (120 in‑portfolio) to offset primary care substitution.
- Maintain clinical-grade asset differentiation to preserve valuation against cheaper retail conversions that require ~£2m CAPEX to match standards.
- Design developments with mobile-diagnostic integration (docking bays) to convert mobile units from substitutes into complementary, fee-generating services.
KEY NUMBERS
- Portfolio occupancy: 99%
- Portfolio properties: 612; pharmacies integrated: 120
- Portfolio valuation: £3.2bn
- Investment into diagnostic centres: £100m
- New development pipeline cost (example): £75m per scheme
- Additional CAPEX to convert retail to clinical grade: ~£2.0m per unit
- Mobile unit alternative to permanent build cost: ~£20m
- Remote consultation share: 25% of GP appointments
- MRI demand growth: ~7% YoY
- Pharmacy clinical service penetration: 90% of pharmacies
- Potential GP footfall diversion to pharmacies: ~15%
Assura Plc (AGR.L) - Porter's Five Forces: Threat of new entrants
HIGH CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS DETER FRAGMENTED ENTRY
Starting a healthcare REIT in the UK to achieve meaningful scale requires large upfront capital. Assura's portfolio value of £3.2 billion across 612 properties produces substantial economies of scale in asset management, development and operational overheads. Typical market estimates indicate a minimum viable asset base of c.£500 million is required to spread fixed costs effectively; reaching that threshold requires multiple equity raises or significant institutional backing.
Assura's cost of debt and access to capital create a clear financial moat. New entrants face a market cost of capital of approximately 5.5% for comparable unsecured or lightly secured structures, while Assura benefits from an established credit profile and secured borrowing at c.3.3%. The 220 basis point financing advantage lowers Assura's weighted average cost of capital materially and enables more aggressive bidding on new acquisitions without eroding yield. The volume of capital required and this financing gap make it difficult for new players to compete on price when targeting core primary care assets.
| Metric | Assura (Actual) | New Entrant (Typical) |
|---|---|---|
| Portfolio value | £3.2 billion | £0.5 billion (minimum viable) |
| Number of properties | 612 | 30-80 (to reach £0.5bn) |
| Cost of capital (debt) | 3.3% | 5.5% |
| Financing spread advantage | - | 220 bps vs Assura |
| Minimum capital to enter | - | £300-£500 million equity + leverage |
REGULATORY COMPLEXITY AND NHS COMPLIANCE STANDARDS
New entrants must master the NHS Premises Costs Directions and related reimbursement mechanisms which determine how rent to GPs and other primary care tenants is recoverable. Non-compliance or misinterpretation can materially affect revenue: analysis of sector outcomes shows up to c.20% reductions in rental income where lease structures failed to meet NHS reimbursement criteria.
Assura operates a specialist in-house leasing and compliance function that manages 612 bespoke GP leases and relationships with Integrated Care Boards (ICBs) and NHS entities. Replicating that capability would require investment in experienced staff, systems and legal counsel; market benchmarking suggests an annual cost of c.£2.0 million for a newcomer to build an equivalent team and compliance framework.
- Regulatory complexity: NHS Premises Costs Directions, reimbursement rules, and pension/lease tax considerations.
- Operational cost to replicate compliance team: ~£2.0m p.a.
- Revenue risk on non-compliance: up to 20% reduction in affected property rent.
- Clinical and building standards update cycle: every 3-5 years, requiring capex and monitoring.
| Regulatory Factor | Impact on Revenue | Replication Cost for New Entrant |
|---|---|---|
| Failure to meet reimbursement rules | Up to 20% rent reduction | - |
| Specialist lease management team | Maintains full recoverable rent | £2.0 million p.a. |
| Clinical standard updates (3-5 yrs) | Periodic capex obligations (5-10% of ERV per cycle) | Variable; budgeted into asset management |
LONG PLANNING CYCLES DELAY MARKET PENETRATION
The UK planning environment for primary care developments typically requires c.36 months from project inception to practical completion, incorporating pre-application, planning consent, construction and commissioning. Assura's long-term relationships and planning pipeline-valued at approximately £75 million-reflect years of engagement with local planning authorities and ICBs, enabling staged delivery and faster handover of income-generating assets.
A new entrant would, on average, endure a three-year income lag while carrying land holding and financing costs. Rising land prices (current market trend ~6% p.a.) exacerbate this carry cost. Assura's broader income stream (c.£151 million annual rent income across the portfolio) and diversified pipeline permit absorption of project-level timing risk, whereas newcomers concentrated on a small pipeline face heightened solvency and liquidity pressure during the development phase.
| Project Timeline Component | Typical Duration | Financial Implication for New Entrant |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-application & planning | 6-12 months | Land holding costs + professional fees |
| Construction | 12-18 months | Construction finance interest; capex outflow |
| Fit-out & commissioning | 3-6 months | Delayed rental commencement |
| Total typical cycle | ~36 months | 3-year cash flow lag; exposure to 6% p.a. land inflation |
LIMITED AVAILABILITY OF PRIME HEALTHCARE SITES
Primary care real estate supply in the UK is constrained. The top two specialist REITs control approximately 35% of private stock in the segment, and many prime sites adjacent to major hospitals or town centers are subject to long-term leases of 10-20 years, reducing opportunities for organic acquisition.
Where prime assets become available, market dynamics force purchasers to pay meaningful premiums. Market transactions indicate that acquiring established primary care assets from smaller private owners typically requires a premium of c.15% versus replacement or development cost, reflecting scarcity and the value of long-term NHS-backed income. Assura's scale and established relationships position it as the preferred counterparty for disposals and site partnerships, further restricting high-quality stock available to new entrants.
- Market concentration: top two REITs ~35% of private primary care stock.
- Lease term profile on prime sites: 10-20 year contracts common.
- Acquisition premium for available prime assets: ~15% over replacement cost.
- Assura positioning: £3.2bn market value supports preferential access to deals.
| Supply Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Top-two REITs share of private stock | 35% |
| Typical long-term lease length (prime) | 10-20 years |
| Premium required to acquire existing prime assets | ~15% |
| Assura valuation | £3.2 billion |
Disclaimer
All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.
We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site—including articles or product references—constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.
All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.