Globus Maritime Limited (GLBS) Bundle
You're looking at Globus Maritime Limited (GLBS) and trying to figure out if the dry bulk sector's near-term headwinds are a buying opportunity or a signal to hold cash. Honestly, the first half of the 2025 fiscal year shows a clear picture of that market tension: the company posted a net loss of $3.35 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025, a sharp reversal from the prior year, even though revenue actually grew to $18.2 million due to operating more vessels.
The core issue is the daily Time Charter Equivalent (TCE) rate, which dropped 22% to an average of just $10,274 per vessel per day in the first half of 2025, a direct result of those unfavorable market conditions in bulk shipping. Still, the balance sheet shows a significant cash position of approximately $47.89 million against a total debt of roughly $118.09 million, giving them a decent cushion to weather this cyclical softness, but the upcoming Q3 2025 earnings, estimated to show a loss of -$0.12 per share, will be defintely critical to watch for any sign of a market turnaround.
Revenue Analysis
You need to know if Globus Maritime Limited (GLBS) is growing revenue and, more importantly, how they are doing it. The direct takeaway is that while top-line revenue is up, the underlying market rate is not, meaning their growth is coming from fleet expansion, not better pricing power.
For the first half of 2025 (H1 2025), Globus Maritime Limited reported total revenue of $18.2 million, marking a 5% increase over the $17.2 million from the same period in 2024. That's a decent lift, but you have to look closer. The company's revenue is almost entirely comprised of voyage revenues, which is the money they earn from chartering their dry bulk carriers-ships that haul things like iron ore, coal, and grain.
The entire business model is a single segment: dry bulk shipping. So, there's no complex mix of products or services to break down; it's all about the fleet and the daily rate. All nine of their dry bulk carriers-a mix of six Kamsarmax and three Ultramax vessels-are currently operating on short-term time charters, which the company generally considers 'on spot.' This means their revenue is highly sensitive to the immediate market rates, which is a near-term risk. You can dig deeper into this analysis in Breaking Down Globus Maritime Limited (GLBS) Financial Health: Key Insights for Investors.
Here's the quick math on what drove the H1 2025 revenue growth: the company operated a higher average number of vessels, 9.4 in H1 2025 compared to only 6.9 in H1 2024. But, the daily Time Charter Equivalent (TCE) rate-the true measure of market strength-dropped significantly. That's defintely a trade-off.
| Metric | H1 2025 Value | H1 2024 Value | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Revenue | $18.2 million | $17.2 million | 5% Increase |
| Average Vessels Operated | 9.4 | 6.9 | 36% Increase |
| Daily TCE Rate | $10,274 | $13,246 | 22% Decline |
What this estimate hides is the market weakness: the daily TCE rate fell by 22% to $10,274 per vessel per day in H1 2025, down from $13,246 in the prior year period. The only reason total revenue grew by 5% is because the company added vessels, which is a capital-intensive way to grow revenue. For the trailing twelve months (LTM) ending June 30, 2025, the total revenue was $35.80 million, an 11.80% growth year-over-year, which reflects this fleet expansion strategy.
The significant change in the revenue stream is the shift in the core driver. You are seeing a volume-over-price strategy: more ships are carrying the load of lower market rates. This is a crucial distinction for investors, as it means future revenue growth is tied directly to their ability to finance and acquire more vessels, not necessarily a strengthening dry bulk market. Analyst consensus for the upcoming Q3 2025 revenue is $10.5 million, suggesting a slight seasonal uptick, but the underlying rate risk remains.
Profitability Metrics
You're looking at Globus Maritime Limited (GLBS) in a tough market, and the bottom line is clear: the company is currently operating at a loss, but their fleet modernization is a strong operational counter-move against sector headwinds. For the first half of the 2025 fiscal year (H1 2025), Globus Maritime Limited reported a Net Loss of $3.35 million on $18.2 million in revenue, translating to a negative net profit margin.
Here's the quick math on their core profitability, focusing on the first six months of 2025. While we don't have the exact Gross Profit and Operating Profit figures in the public summary, the Time Charter Equivalent (TCE) rate and Adjusted EBITDA give us a clear picture of operational performance before non-cash items like depreciation.
| Profitability Metric (H1 2025) | Value | Margin (Calculated) |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $18.2 million | N/A |
| Adjusted EBITDA (a proxy for operating cash flow) | $5.2 million | 28.57% (EBITDA Margin) |
| Net Loss | $3.35 million | -18.41% (Net Profit Margin) |
Trends in Profitability and Operational Efficiency
The trend shows that Globus Maritime Limited is fighting a challenging dry bulk market. The company's Time Charter Equivalent (TCE) rate-a key metric for shipping revenue-fell by 22% in H1 2025 to $10,274 per vessel per day, down from $13,246 in the same period of 2024. This drop in the average daily rate is the primary driver of the profitability decline, even though they increased their fleet size.
To be fair, the company is actively managing what they can control: their fleet and costs. They operated an average of 9.4 vessels in H1 2025, up from 6.9 vessels in H1 2024, which helped revenue increase by 5% overall to $18.2 million. They are operating a younger, more fuel-efficient fleet, with a weighted average age of 7.8 years as of September 2025, which should help keep vessel operating expenses (OpEx) under control, a critical component of maintaining a healthy gross margin.
- Daily TCE rate dropped 22% in H1 2025.
- Fleet expansion drove a 5% revenue increase.
- Modern fleet of 7.8 years average age aids cost management.
Comparison with Industry Averages
Globus Maritime Limited's negative profitability is not an isolated event, but it is worse than some peers. The dry bulk shipping sector is facing a tough year, with the Baltic Dry Index (BDI) having fallen by an average of 28.2% so far in 2025, reflecting a broad softening of freight rates. The overall market is struggling with supply growth (1.9% in 2025) outpacing demand growth (0-1% in 2025).
For context, a comparable dry bulk carrier, Diana Shipping Inc., reported a Net Income of $4.5 million in Q2 2025 on $54.7 million in revenue, giving them a Net Profit Margin of about 8.23%. This highlights a key difference: Globus Maritime Limited's reliance on the spot market, while offering upside, has exposed them more severely to the softening rates in H1 2025, resulting in the -18.41% Net Profit Margin. Companies with a conservative, longer-term chartering strategy, like Diana Shipping, are showing positive net income, even with lower revenues.
Your action here is to watch the TCE rate trend closely in the second half of 2025. If you want to dive deeper into the ownership structure, check out: Exploring Globus Maritime Limited (GLBS) Investor Profile: Who's Buying and Why?
Debt vs. Equity Structure
You're looking at Globus Maritime Limited (GLBS) and trying to figure out if their growth is on solid ground or built on too much debt. The quick answer is that Globus Maritime Limited is more leveraged than a key competitor, with a Debt-to-Equity ratio of approximately 0.76 as of June 30, 2025, which is higher than the dry bulk peer group average.
This ratio (total debt divided by shareholder equity) is a core measure of financial leverage (how much a company uses borrowed money to finance its assets). A higher number means more reliance on debt, which can magnify returns in good times but also amplify losses when the market turns. For a capital-intensive industry like dry bulk shipping, some debt is normal, but the balance matters defintely.
Here's the quick math on their balance sheet, based on the unaudited consolidated financial results for the first half of 2025:
- Total Debt & Finance Liabilities (net): $131.205 million
- Total Equity: $173.051 million
- Calculated Debt-to-Equity Ratio: 0.76
The total debt load of $131.205 million is heavily skewed toward the long-term side, which is typical for a shipping company financing multi-million dollar vessels. Their long-term debt and capital lease obligation stood at roughly $104.39 million as of June 30, 2025, meaning about $26.815 million is due in the near-term (short-term debt). This structure gives them time to manage the principal payments, but the total leverage is still a point of focus.
When you compare this to an industry peer like Star Bulk Carriers (SBLK), the difference is clear. Star Bulk Carriers reported a Debt-to-Equity ratio of just 0.40 (40%) in November 2025, nearly half of Globus Maritime Limited's leverage. This suggests Globus Maritime Limited is running a more aggressive capital structure, relying more on borrowed money than shareholder capital to fund its fleet expansion and operations.
The company is actively managing its capital structure, too. In March 2025, Globus Maritime Limited sold the 2007-built River Globe for a gross price of $8.55 million. That cash inflow reduces assets and can be used to pay down debt or fund new acquisitions, which is a prudent move to manage the balance sheet. They are also currently in talks with financial institutions to secure competitive financing for their modern fleet and new shipbuilding projects, which shows their commitment to balancing growth with keeping funding costs reasonable. You can read more about their strategic direction here: Mission Statement, Vision, & Core Values of Globus Maritime Limited (GLBS).
The high leverage isn't necessarily a red flag in a cyclical upturn, but it makes the company more sensitive to the dry bulk market's volatility, especially if the unfavorable market conditions seen in the first half of 2025 persist.
Next Step: Review the covenants on their term loan facilities to understand the headroom before a debt default is triggered.
Liquidity and Solvency
You're looking for a clear picture of Globus Maritime Limited (GLBS)'s ability to cover its short-term debts, and the data from the first half of 2025 is defintely giving us a mixed signal. The company's liquidity ratios are healthy, but the cash flow statement reveals a significant capital expenditure drain.
Globus Maritime Limited has maintained a solid liquidity position, which is your first line of defense against market volatility. The trailing twelve months (TTM) Current Ratio, which measures current assets against current liabilities, stands at a strong 1.72 as of November 2025. This means the company has $1.72 in current assets for every dollar of short-term debt. The Quick Ratio (or acid-test ratio), which is a stricter measure that excludes less liquid assets like inventory, is also robust at 1.57. That's a good buffer.
Working Capital and Near-Term Strength
While the ratios look good, the trend in working capital-the difference between current assets and current liabilities-shows some contraction. The total current assets for Globus Maritime Limited were approximately $54.6 million as of June 30, 2025, which was a significant decrease of 37.92% compared to the prior period. This drop is primarily driven by a fall in cash and cash equivalents, which were $48.33 million, down 31.71%. A shrinking current asset base, even with a high ratio, means less operational flexibility. The firm's strategy of fleet renewal and expansion is the likely cause, but you need to watch this number.
- Current Ratio: 1.72 (Strong short-term coverage).
- Quick Ratio: 1.57 (Good cash-backed liquidity).
- Cash/Equivalents: $48.33 million (Down 31.71% in Q2 2025).
Cash Flow Statement Overview: The Investment Hurdle
The cash flow statement is where the real story of the company's capital allocation lives. Here's the quick math for the last twelve months (LTM) leading up to the end of Q2 2025:
| Cash Flow Category | LTM Amount (in millions USD) | Trend Implication |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow (OCF) | $4.73 | Positive but thin core operations. |
| Investing Cash Flow (CapEx) | -$82.57 | Aggressive fleet renewal/expansion. |
| Free Cash Flow (FCF) | -$77.84 | Significant cash burn after CapEx. |
Operating Cash Flow (OCF) is positive at $4.73 million LTM, which is good-it shows the core dry bulk shipping business is generating cash. But, the Investing Cash Flow, dominated by capital expenditures (CapEx) of -$82.57 million LTM, is the massive headwind. This investment in the fleet is why the Free Cash Flow (FCF)-the cash left over for debt repayment, dividends, or acquisitions-is a negative $77.84 million. This isn't a liquidity crisis right now, but it is a clear capital intensity problem. The company is funding its growth, which is a long-term play, but it puts pressure on the balance sheet today.
Potential Liquidity Concerns and Strengths
The primary strength is the existing cash balance of $48.33 million and the high current ratio. These provide a cushion. The major concern is the sustained negative Free Cash Flow. A negative $77.84 million FCF means the company must rely on Financing Cash Flow-issuing new debt or equity-to cover the gap, which can dilute shareholders or increase interest expense. Management is already seeking competitive financing options, which suggests they are proactively addressing this need. The market is tough, with the daily Time Charter Equivalent (TCE) rate dropping to $10,274 per vessel per day in the first half of 2025, a 22% decline from the prior year, so every dollar matters. You need to understand the source of their financing to gauge the long-term risk. For a deeper dive into who is betting on this strategy, you should read Exploring Globus Maritime Limited (GLBS) Investor Profile: Who's Buying and Why?
Next step: Check the latest Form 6-K filings to see the terms of any new debt or equity issued to cover that negative FCF.
Valuation Analysis
You're looking at Globus Maritime Limited (GLBS) and trying to figure out if it's a bargain or a trap. Honestly, based on the metrics for the 2025 fiscal year, the stock looks defintely undervalued from an asset perspective, but its earnings multiples tell a more complicated story.
The core takeaway is this: the market values the company's assets very cheaply, but its current earnings performance is weak, which is common in the cyclical dry bulk shipping sector. The consensus among analysts is a 'Hold,' but with significant upside potential if the sector improves.
Here's the quick math on why this is a tough call:
- Price-to-Book (P/B) Ratio: At just 0.14, this is incredibly low. A P/B below 1.0 suggests the market is valuing the company at less than its net tangible asset value. This is a classic sign of a potential deep-value play in a capital-intensive industry like shipping.
- Enterprise Value-to-EBITDA (EV/EBITDA): The ratio stands at 14.78. This is a high multiple, suggesting that, based on current operating cash flow (EBITDA), the company is not cheap. This ratio is often a better measure for companies with high debt, like shipping firms, and 14.78 indicates a premium or, more likely, a temporary dip in EBITDA.
- Price-to-Earnings (P/E) Ratio: The Trailing Twelve Months (TTM) P/E is around 64.3x, which is very high and signals either overvaluation or extremely low earnings. The forward P/E is actually -3.84, reflecting an expectation of negative earnings in the near term, which is a significant risk factor.
The low P/B ratio of 0.14 is the strongest argument for an 'undervalued' case, implying a huge discount to the company's net assets. But, you have to remember that a high EV/EBITDA of 14.78 and a negative forward P/E show that the market is deeply skeptical of its ability to generate profits on those assets right now.
Looking at the stock price trend over the last 12 months, the picture is volatile but flat-to-negative. The stock has traded in a 52-week range between a low of $0.99 and a high of $1.64, and it has fallen by about -15.44% over the past year. The closing price as of November 2025 was $1.18. The price action shows a lack of conviction, but it has stayed above the dollar mark, which is critical for NASDAQ listing compliance.
On shareholder returns, Globus Maritime Limited is not a dividend stock. The Trailing Twelve Months (TTM) dividend yield is 0.00% as of November 2025, and the company has not paid a dividend recently. This means you are entirely dependent on capital appreciation for your returns, not income.
Wall Street analysts are split, but the consensus is a 'Hold' rating, based on 2 analysts with one 'Buy' and one 'Sell' rating. The average 12-month price target is a robust $3.00, which suggests a massive potential upside of over 154% from the current price. This huge gap between the current price and the target suggests analysts see a high probability of a cyclical recovery in the dry bulk market that will dramatically improve earnings and close the valuation gap.
You need to weigh the deep-discount P/B against the poor earnings multiples and the lack of a dividend. Your decision hinges on your conviction in a near-term recovery in the dry bulk shipping rates. For more on the institutional sentiment, you should check out Exploring Globus Maritime Limited (GLBS) Investor Profile: Who's Buying and Why?
| Valuation Metric (TTM/Current) | Value (2025 FY Data) | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Book (P/B) | 0.14 | Deeply Undervalued on an asset basis. |
| EV/EBITDA | 14.78 | High, suggesting weak current operating cash flow relative to Enterprise Value. |
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 64.3x | Very high, indicating low or volatile earnings. |
| Stock Price (Nov 2025) | $1.18 | Near the low end of the 52-week range ($0.99 - $1.64). |
| Analyst Consensus Target | $3.00 | Implies 154.24% upside from current price. |
Risk Factors
You need to know that Globus Maritime Limited (GLBS) faces a classic shipping industry dilemma: massive exposure to a volatile spot market while navigating a period of unfavorable sector conditions. The direct takeaway is that the H1 2025 net loss of $3.35 million is a clear signal of this risk, driven by a sharp drop in daily charter rates.
External and Market Risks: The Rate Rollercoaster
The biggest risk is the dry bulk market itself. Globus Maritime Limited's financial health is tied directly to the daily Time Charter Equivalent (TCE) rate, which is essentially the daily revenue per vessel. In the first half of 2025, the daily TCE rate plummeted to $10,274 per day, a significant 22% decline compared to the same period in 2024. This drop directly translated into the H1 2025 net loss. Honestly, you can't control global trade, but you have to live by it.
The broader external environment is defintely not helping. We're seeing a 'balanced but fragile' dry bulk market, with a dangerous oversupply situation in the Supramax and Ultramax segments-which make up Globus Maritime Limited's entire fleet. Plus, geopolitical flare-ups, like Red Sea tensions, and the lingering threat of trade wars (like US-China tariffs) create costly detours and unpredictable cargo flows.
- Commodity Demand: Weakening iron ore and coal demand, especially from China, pressures freight rates.
- Fleet Oversupply: Supramax and Ultramax fleets are projected to grow by up to 5% in 2025, outpacing flat demand.
- Regulatory Costs: New environmental regulations, such as the European Union's Emissions Trading System (ETS), increase operating costs for older vessels.
Operational and Financial Risks
The company's decision to keep all its vessels on short-term time charters, essentially operating on the spot market, is a double-edged sword. When rates are high, this strategy maximizes profit, but when rates are low, like in H1 2025, it exposes them to the full force of the market downturn. Here's the quick math: Q2 2025 revenue was $9.5 million, but the net loss was $1.9 million. A small revenue miss translates quickly into a loss when margins are thin.
A major financial risk highlighted in recent filings is the authorization for a potential reverse stock split of up to 1-for-20, approved by shareholders in September 2025. This move is often a necessary, but concerning, action for companies trading below the NASDAQ's minimum bid price requirement, signaling pressure on the stock's valuation and liquidity.
For more on the recent performance, check out Breaking Down Globus Maritime Limited (GLBS) Financial Health: Key Insights for Investors.
Mitigation Strategies and Fleet Renewal
Globus Maritime Limited is trying to mitigate some of these risks through fleet renewal and operational efficiency. Their current fleet of nine vessels has a weighted average age of a relatively modern 7.8 years as of September 2025. A younger fleet is generally more fuel-efficient, which helps keep costs under control and prepares them for stricter environmental rules.
They are also continuing their fleet renewal efforts with two additional fuel-efficient Ultramaxes scheduled for delivery in 2026. This focus on modern, efficient vessels is a smart long-term strategy to capitalize on the new regulatory environment, but it won't solve the immediate problem of low spot rates in 2025.
The company's key financial metrics for the first half of 2025 clearly illustrate the operational challenge:
| Metric | H1 2025 Value | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $18.2 million | 5% increase from H1 2024 due to more vessels. |
| Net Loss | $3.35 million | Compared to a net income of $3 million in H1 2024. |
| Daily TCE Rate | $10,274 | A 22% decline from H1 2024, the primary driver of the loss. |
| Adjusted EBITDA | $5.2 million | A measure of operating performance before non-cash items. |
What this estimate hides is the potential for a sharp rate rebound, which is always possible in dry bulk, but for now, the risk is squarely on the downside. The company's reliance on short-term charters means they need rates to recover, and fast.
Growth Opportunities
You're looking past the current dry bulk market volatility, and honestly, that's the right move; you need to see what Globus Maritime Limited (GLBS) is building for the long term. The core growth story here isn't a new product but a massive fleet upgrade, which is a major capital investment that will defintely pay off when the market turns. They are strategically swapping older, less efficient ships for new, greener tonnage.
The company is laser-focused on fleet renewal, which is its primary growth driver. By September 2025, their operating fleet stood at nine dry bulk vessels with a total carrying capacity of 680,622 DWT, and the weighted average age was a competitive 7.8 years. That's a young fleet for this sector. They successfully completed a first test voyage using a sustainable biofuel blend in 2025, a critical step toward future-proofing their operations and reducing fuel costs.
Here's the quick math on the near-term financial picture for the full 2025 fiscal year. The first half of 2025 saw revenue of $18.2 million, a 5% increase year-over-year, but they reported a net loss of $3.35 million for that period. The consensus analyst estimates suggest a challenging back half, projecting Q3 2025 revenue at $10.50 million and Q4 2025 revenue at $11.00 million. Still, the average 1-year price target from Wall Street analysts sits at $3.00 USD, which suggests a belief in the eventual payoff of the current strategy.
The real opportunity is in their competitive advantage: a modern, fuel-efficient fleet. They've been actively clearing out older vessels, like the sale of a 2007-built supramax for $8.55 million in early 2025. This money is being recycled into new capacity. The company has new Ultramax bulkers on order, with two slated for delivery in the second half of 2026, costing approximately $75.5 million. This continuous investment positions them well against competitors whose older ships will lose competitiveness under tightening environmental regulations.
The strategic initiatives driving future growth are clear and concrete:
- Fleet Modernization: Replacing older tonnage with new, fuel-efficient vessels.
- Strategic Financing: Using sale-and-leaseback deals, like the $25 million deal for the GLBS Magic, to fund fleet expansion without excessive debt.
- Fuel Innovation: Proving out biofuel use to manage future operational costs and emissions.
They are building a more resilient, lower-cost operating model. That's the long game. You can learn more about their long-term vision in their Mission Statement, Vision, & Core Values of Globus Maritime Limited (GLBS).
What this estimate hides is the dry bulk market itself. If the Time Charter Equivalent (TCE) rate-which was $11,444 per day in Q2 2025-rises significantly, these revenue projections will look conservative. If it drops, the losses will widen. Right now, the company is managing what it can control: cost and fleet quality.

Globus Maritime Limited (GLBS) DCF Excel Template
5-Year Financial Model
40+ Charts & Metrics
DCF & Multiple Valuation
Free Email Support
Disclaimer
All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.
We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site—including articles or product references—constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.
All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.