TreeHouse Foods, Inc. (THS) PESTLE Analysis

TreeHouse Foods, Inc. (THS): PESTLE Analysis [Nov-2025 Updated]

US | Consumer Defensive | Packaged Foods | NYSE
TreeHouse Foods, Inc. (THS) PESTLE Analysis

Fully Editable: Tailor To Your Needs In Excel Or Sheets

Professional Design: Trusted, Industry-Standard Templates

Investor-Approved Valuation Models

MAC/PC Compatible, Fully Unlocked

No Expertise Is Needed; Easy To Follow

TreeHouse Foods, Inc. (THS) Bundle

Get Full Bundle:
$18 $12
$18 $12
$18 $12
$18 $12
$18 $12
$25 $15
$18 $12
$18 $12
$18 $12

TOTAL:

You're looking at TreeHouse Foods, Inc. (THS) right as the private label trend is peaking, with US market share projected to hit 21.5% by year-end 2025, which is a huge tailwind for their $3.65 billion to $3.75 billion sales guidance. Still, that opportunity is balanced by real, immediate pressures: commodity inflation gnawing at margins and major legal compliance like the FDA's FSMA 204 traceability rule demanding focus, not to mention their $120 million tech spend on automation. To make your next strategic call, you need to see how these external forces-from political tariffs to environmental goals-are truly shaping the playing field for TreeHouse Foods, Inc., so dive into the PESTLE breakdown below.

TreeHouse Foods, Inc. (THS) - PESTLE Analysis: Political factors

US trade policy shifts defintely impact raw material tariffs, raising input costs.

The volatility in US trade policy throughout 2025 has created a challenging cost environment for food manufacturers like TreeHouse Foods, Inc. (THS). While the company's direct exposure to international customers is relatively small-net sales from outside the US were only about 5% in 2024, mostly in Canada-the impact on raw material costs is significant because many ingredients are globally sourced commodities.

A new wave of protectionism saw the implementation of tariffs on imported agricultural products starting April 2, 2025, with a baseline tariff rate of 10% on US goods imports and reciprocal rates rising as high as 50% for certain trade partners. This action immediately increased the cost of imported inputs, with retail food prices expected to rise by anywhere from 5% to 18% depending on the product. TreeHouse Foods manages this risk through commodity contracts, which had a notional value of $91.0 million as of September 30, 2025, but the underlying cost pressure is real.

Here's the quick math: higher tariffs on key commodities like soybeans, corn, and dairy mean higher input costs, forcing THS to rely on favorable pricing to recover commodity inflation, a factor cited in their Q3 2025 results.

Government subsidies for agricultural commodities affect ingredient pricing stability.

Federal farm policy, particularly through subsidies and price support programs, acts as a hidden hand in the ingredient market, directly affecting TreeHouse Foods' cost of goods sold. The US Department of Agriculture (USDA) is actively monitoring markets and considering financial aid for farmers in Fall 2025 due to low commodity prices and trade disruptions.

A major change impacting THS's baked goods and beverage categories is the adjustment to the US sugar program within the July 2025 One Big Beautiful Bill Act. This legislation substantially increases the support prices for sugarcane and sugar beet crops, which is the price floor at which the government is required to purchase sugar. This political decision creates a higher, more stable cost for a key ingredient, limiting the potential for THS to benefit from global price dips. Increased payments from other commodity program improvements in the Act, however, are not expected to begin until Fall 2026, leaving a gap in immediate farm income stability.

Lobbying efforts on SNAP (Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program) influence consumer purchasing power.

As a leading private label manufacturer, TreeHouse Foods' revenue is closely tied to the purchasing power of value-conscious consumers. The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is a critical component of this, with approximately 42 million people in the US relying on it for food.

The One Big Beautiful Bill Act signed in early July 2025 introduced significant changes to SNAP work requirements, effective September 1, 2025. These new rules expand the age cap for able-bodied adults without dependents to 64 and require 80 hours a month of work to receive benefits.

This political shift is defintely a risk for THS, as it is expected to reduce the number of eligible recipients and, consequently, the total amount of food spending in the economy. One grocery store manager noted that around 80% of his customers rely on SNAP, illustrating the program's importance to the retail food sector. Any reduction in SNAP benefits translates directly into lower demand for value-priced private label products.

Potential for new federal mandates on food labeling and ingredient sourcing.

The regulatory landscape for food labeling is undergoing a significant overhaul in 2025, driven by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) prioritizing consumer health awareness. This means compliance costs are rising for all manufacturers, including TreeHouse Foods.

Key mandates and proposals include:

  • Front-of-Package (FOP) Labeling: A proposed rule mandates FOP nutrition labeling, requiring a box that lists the percent daily values of saturated fat, sodium, and added sugars.
  • Updated 'Healthy' Definition: A final rule was published on December 27, 2024, aligning the definition with the Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2020-2025. Compliance is mandatory by February 25, 2028.
  • New Allergen Disclosure: In June 2025, the FDA updated its compliance program to include sesame as the ninth major allergen, requiring clear declaration on all labels.
  • Color Additive Ban: The authorized use of FD&C Red No. 3 in food was revoked, with a deadline of January 15, 2027, for manufacturers to reformulate products.

These changes force immediate capital expenditure for label redesigns and product reformulation, which THS must manage alongside its 2025 capital expenditure outlook of approximately $125 million. The table below summarizes the near-term political risk factors for TreeHouse Foods, Inc. as of late 2025.

Political Factor 2025 Status/Value Impact on TreeHouse Foods (THS)
US Trade Tariffs on Ag Imports Baseline tariff of 10%; up to 50% for some nations (as of April 2025). Increases raw material costs (e.g., corn, sugar, dairy), pressuring margins. Recent tariff relief in November 2025 provides a cost break.
SNAP Work Requirements New rules effective September 1, 2025, expanding age cap to 64 and requiring 80 hours/month work. Reduces purchasing power for a key demographic of private label consumers (42 million people rely on SNAP), risking volume decline.
Sugar Program Subsidies Substantial increase in support prices for sugarcane/sugar beet in the July 2025 Act. Creates a higher, more rigid cost floor for a critical ingredient in THS's baked goods and beverages portfolio.
FDA Labeling Mandates New 'Healthy' definition (Dec 2024); Sesame added as 9th allergen (June 2025); FOP labeling proposed (May 2025 comment deadline). Requires significant spending on label redesign and product reformulation, adding to the $125 million 2025 CapEx budget.

TreeHouse Foods, Inc. (THS) - PESTLE Analysis: Economic factors

You're looking at the economic landscape for TreeHouse Foods, Inc. (THS) right now, and honestly, it's a mixed bag of tailwinds and headwinds. The big picture is that consumers are still prioritizing value, which is great for your private label business, but the cost side of the ledger is getting tighter as we move into late 2025.

Private Label Market Share Opportunity

The structural shift toward store brands is your biggest friend here. Private label market share is projected to hit a massive 21.5% in the US by year-end 2025. That's a huge chunk of the grocery dollar, and it shows retailers are committed to growing their own brands because they control the margin. For TreeHouse Foods, this means the demand floor for your products remains high, even if overall consumption slows down a bit. It's a defintely powerful secular trend.

  • Retailers are heavily investing in private brands.
  • Consumer trust in quality is increasing.
  • Value remains a top purchasing driver.

Full-Year Sales Outlook

Despite some recent volume softness, the top-line guidance reflects confidence in capturing that private label growth. Full-year 2025 net sales guidance is strong, sitting between $3.65 billion and $3.75 billion. To be fair, Q3 2025 results showed revenue of $840.3 million, slightly below analyst expectations, which suggests the latter half of the year is a battle to hit that high end of the full-year forecast. You need to watch those final quarter sales closely.

Persistent Commodity Inflation and Margin Pressure

Here's where the pressure mounts. Persistent commodity inflation is still biting, with an estimated 4.5% increase for key inputs expected in the second half of 2025. We saw this pressure in Q3 2025, where Adjusted EBITDA actually decreased year-over-year to $91.6 million, partly due to broader macroeconomic consumption trends offsetting supply chain savings. You've got to keep driving those operational efficiencies to keep pace with input costs.

Cost of Capital and Investment

The broader macroeconomic environment means borrowing money is expensive. Higher interest rates increase the cost of capital for planned facility upgrades and efficiency projects that TreeHouse Foods needs to execute. We know the company expected capital expenditures of approximately $125 million for 2025, and financing that debt or new investment carries a higher hurdle rate now. The expected net interest expense for 2025, in the range of $80 million to $90 million, reflects this higher rate environment.

Here's the quick math on some key economic indicators impacting your planning:

Economic Metric 2025 Projection/Actual (H2 Estimate) Source of Impact
Projected US Private Label Share 21.5% Market Growth Opportunity
Full-Year 2025 Net Sales Guidance $3.65B - $3.75B Top-Line Expectation
Key Input Cost Inflation (H2 Est.) 4.5% Margin Squeeze Risk
Estimated 2025 Net Interest Expense $80M - $90M Cost of Financing/Debt Service

What this estimate hides is the exact timing of when those commodity cost increases will fully hit the P&L versus when pricing actions will fully offset them. If onboarding takes 14+ days longer than planned, churn risk rises because the price gap with national brands might narrow temporarily.

Finance: draft 13-week cash view by Friday.

TreeHouse Foods, Inc. (THS) - PESTLE Analysis: Social factors

You're looking at how what people want to eat-and why-is shaping the landscape for TreeHouse Foods, Inc. (THS). Honestly, the social currents right now are powerful, pushing private label growth while demanding better ingredients and clearer ethics. For a company like THS, which posted adjusted net sales of $801.4 million in Q2 2025, these shifts aren't just background noise; they are the core of the next product cycle.

Here's the quick math: the market is telling us that value and quality are no longer mutually exclusive. If onboarding new, complex ingredient sourcing takes 14+ days, your time-to-market for a new clean-label SKU rises, which is a risk.

Growing consumer preference for value drives demand for TreeHouse Foods' private-label offerings.

The days when private label meant second-tier quality are definitely over. Consumers are actively choosing store brands because they deliver on value without the national brand premium. Our latest data shows that over half of all surveyed consumers-53 percent-now choose private labels predominantly or exclusively over branded items.

In the US specifically, private label dollar share sits at 42 percent. TreeHouse Foods, Inc. benefits directly from this, as private brands in their core categories held steady at approximately 25 percent dollar share in 2025. Retailers are doubling down; for instance, Walmart launched its largest food and beverage private brand in 20 years recently. When 75 percent of shoppers say private label products offer good value, it's a clear mandate for manufacturers like you to keep the quality high and the price gap favorable.

Increased focus on health and wellness demands cleaner labels and functional ingredients in product lines.

Health is now holistic; it's not just about low fat anymore. A massive 83 percent of consumers are looking to live healthier lifestyles, and 70 percent are actively trying to eat more nutrient-dense foods. This translates directly into a demand for 'clean eating,' meaning minimally processed foods with transparent, recognizable ingredients.

Functionality is the new frontier. Consumers are seeking specific benefits like improved gut health, stress reduction, and satiety, leading to a surge in products featuring probiotics, fiber, and protein. This is where private label has an opening: one in three shoppers look to store brands specifically to find affordable options with these functional ingredients. You need to anticipate regulatory tightening on ultra-processed foods, so simplifying ingredient decks is crucial for long-term success.

Shifting demographics require product diversification into ethnic and specialized diet foods.

America's palate is getting more adventurous, driven by a more multicultural population and younger consumers seeking novelty. The US Ethnic Food Market is projected to grow at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 7.8 percent between 2025 and 2030. Millennials and Gen Z are the engine here, valuing authentic and fusion flavors.

This isn't just about traditional staples; it's about adaptation. The rise of plant-based diets means there's growing interest in vegan and vegetarian versions of ethnic staples, like falafel or curries. To capture this, retailers are demanding a three-tiered approach: premium, low-cost, and specialized options like international or organic. If you aren't diversifying your offerings to meet these niche and flavor-forward demands, you're leaving dollars on the table.

Millennials and Gen Z are seeking sustainable and ethically sourced food options.

For younger consumers, purchasing decisions are increasingly tied to a company's social and environmental footprint. Nearly two in three Gen Z consumers (61.3 percent) say they are more likely to pay a premium for food that is ethically or sustainably sourced. Furthermore, 73 percent of Gen Z feel their generation is more conscious about the environmental impact of their food choices than previous ones.

TreeHouse Foods, Inc. has made public commitments here. Their 2025 Sustainability Report noted a 6.6 percent reduction in Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions from their 2022 baseline, working toward a 25 percent goal by 2030. They also increased the use of Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO)-certified palm oil by 7 percent. These actions provide tangible proof points for the ethically-minded buyer, which is critical for building brand trust with these powerful cohorts.

Here is a snapshot of the key social metrics driving the market:

Social Factor Driver Key Metric/Value Source Context/Year
Private Label Preference (Overall) 53% choose private label predominantly/exclusively 2025 Shopper Study
US Private Label Dollar Share Approx. 25% in THS categories 2025
Consumer Health Focus 83% looking to live healthier 2025 Research
Gen Z Willingness to Pay More (Sustainability) 61.3% more likely to pay more 2025 Data
Ethnic Food Market CAGR (US) 7.8% (2025-2030) Forecast
THS GHG Reduction (vs. 2022 Baseline) 6.6% reduction achieved As of 2024

Finance: draft 13-week cash view by Friday.

TreeHouse Foods, Inc. (THS) - PESTLE Analysis: Technological factors

You're looking at how TreeHouse Foods, Inc. is spending its cash to get leaner and more reliable in 2025, which is smart because the consumer landscape is still choppy.

Planned 2025 CAPEX of $120 million focuses on supply chain automation for efficiency gains

The company's capital allocation strategy for 2025 prioritizes business investment, with expected capital expenditures (CAPEX) around $125 million. This spending is heavily geared toward the profitability improvement plan spanning 2025-2027, with a major component being supply chain initiatives. These initiatives include deploying the TreeHouse Management Operating System and logistics optimization, which inherently rely on automation and better process flow to drive down costs. While you asked about $120 million, the latest guidance points to approximately $125 million in planned CAPEX for the fiscal year.

Advanced data analytics improve demand forecasting, cutting waste and inventory holding costs

While I don't have a specific percentage improvement for waste reduction yet, the entire operational overhaul TreeHouse Foods is pushing-including supply chain streamlining-is designed to boost execution and consistency. Better data analytics are the backbone of modern supply chain initiatives, helping to manage inventory levels more tightly and reduce spoilage, which directly impacts the bottom line. The focus on margin management and reducing complexity suggests a heavy reliance on better internal data to make smarter production and procurement calls.

E-commerce and direct-to-consumer (DTC) platforms require significant digital infrastructure investment

As a major private label manufacturer selling primarily through large retailers, TreeHouse Foods' digital focus is likely centered on optimizing B2B logistics and customer data exchange rather than a massive DTC build-out right now. Still, supporting major retail partners means investing in the digital infrastructure needed for seamless order transmission, inventory visibility, and slotting fees management, which is a constant, non-trivial tech spend. The company's stated purpose is to drive mutually profitable growth through customer focus and category experience, which today means robust digital integration with retailers.

New food processing and preservation technologies extend shelf life and reduce spoilage

The drive for operational efficiency and cost savings naturally includes looking at how products are made and stored. Investments in capital and processes have already helped address supply chain disruptions, with service levels hitting a six-month high as of September 2025. This suggests technology is already being deployed to improve throughput and reliability, which often involves modernizing processing equipment to maintain quality and extend shelf life, especially in their core snacking and beverage categories.

Here's the quick math on how these operational levers are translating to the P&L, based on mid-2025 reporting:

Metric Value (2025 Fiscal Year Data) Context
Planned CAPEX $125 million Investment in business and supply chain initiatives
Targeted Gross Savings $250 million From plant consolidations and procurement improvements
Q2 2025 Adjusted EBITDA Margin 9.1% Improved by 20 basis points year-over-year
Full-Year 2025 Adjusted EBITDA Guidance $345 million to $375 million Reaffirmed guidance despite volume challenges

What this estimate hides is the exact allocation of the $125 million CAPEX-how much is pure automation versus maintenance or regulatory compliance upgrades. It's all about execution now.

Focus on the ROI of the supply chain tech spend. Finance: draft the 13-week cash flow view incorporating the full realization timeline for the targeted cost savings by Friday.

TreeHouse Foods, Inc. (THS) - PESTLE Analysis: Legal factors

You're navigating a legal landscape that's getting denser, especially with food safety mandates and environmental compliance costs piling up. Honestly, the regulatory environment for a manufacturer like TreeHouse Foods, Inc. is less about one big federal law and more about a complex web of state-level mandates that demand constant attention and budget allocation.

Compliance with the FDA's new Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) 204 traceability rule is a major operational focus.

The Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) 204 rule, which mandates enhanced traceability for certain foods, remains a huge operational lift. While the FDA proposed a 30-month extension to the original January 20, 2026, compliance date, pushing the deadline to a proposed July 20, 2028, this doesn't change the requirements themselves. You still need to map out how you'll handle Key Data Elements (KDEs) tied to Critical Tracking Events (CTEs) for any listed products. The delay was granted because the FDA recognized that full public health benefit requires complete supply chain coordination, meaning even prepared companies were waiting on partners. If you handle any high-risk foods on the Food Traceability List (FTL), your systems need to be ready to share data within 24 hours of a request.

State-level regulations on packaging waste and plastic use increase compliance costs.

State-level environmental laws are hitting the bottom line hard, particularly Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) legislation. As of late 2025, seven states have adopted these packaging EPR laws, shifting end-of-life management costs directly onto producers like TreeHouse Foods, Inc.. Oregon was the first to start collecting fees on July 1, 2025, sending out invoices to over 3,000 companies. For context, the average estimated producer fee in Oregon ranges from 17 cents per pound to 23 cents per pound. California's landmark SB 54 requires a 25% reduction in single-use plastic packaging by 2032, with reporting requirements kicking in on January 1, 2026. To make things more immediate, California also enacted a full ban on polystyrene foam foodware starting January 1, 2025, because recycling targets weren't met.

Here's a snapshot of the immediate financial and operational pressure from these EPR laws:

State with EPR Law Key 2025/2026 Deadline Estimated Fee Impact Basis Potential Penalty Example
Oregon Fee Payment due July 1, 2025 $0.17 to $0.23 per pound (estimate) Late payment fee of 1% per month, compounded
California Reporting starts January 1, 2026 Fees tied to stewardship organization funding Fines up to $50,000 per day possible in some states
Colorado Program commenced July 1, 2025 Fees based on packaging volumes Registration required by October 1, 2024

Ongoing scrutiny from the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) regarding anti-competitive practices in supplier contracts.

The FTC is definitely keeping an eye on how business agreements affect market fairness. In April 2025, the agency launched a public inquiry into regulations that might harm competition, seeking comments until May 27, 2025. This signals a general regulatory environment where contract terms could face closer examination. On the labor front, the FTC established the Joint Labor Task Force (JLTF) on February 26, 2025, specifically to target anti-competitive labor practices, including no-poach agreements between companies. While the FTC's broad ban on noncompete agreements from April 2024 is currently tied up in an appeal, the agencies' updated Antitrust Guidelines emphasize scrutiny of restrictive agreements that impede worker mobility.

Labor laws and union negotiations impact manufacturing plant operating expenses.

Labor costs and workforce restructuring are directly hitting your reported financials. TreeHouse Foods, Inc. announced a significant move in April 2025 to cut 150 corporate jobs as part of operational efficiency initiatives, with the Chief Commercial Officer role being eliminated effective May 30, 2025. Separately, a mass layoff of 129 employees at the South Beloit, Illinois facility on March 28, 2025, triggered an investigation under the federal Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act, which requires 60 days' prior notice for such events. These actions are part of the company's push for cost savings, which is factored into the reaffirmed 2025 financial guidance. The company expects adjusted annual net sales in the range of $3.34 billion to $3.40 billion, and adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations between $345 million to $375 million for the full year. You should expect a partial year impact from these cost-saving actions within the 2025 fiscal results.

Key labor and restructuring actions include:

  • Cut 150 corporate jobs to streamline support functions.
  • Eliminated the Chief Commercial Officer role effective May 30, 2025.
  • WARN Act investigation over 129 layoffs in South Beloit, IL.
  • Restructuring costs factored into 2025 EBITDA guidance.

Finance: draft 13-week cash view by Friday.

TreeHouse Foods, Inc. (THS) - PESTLE Analysis: Environmental factors

You're looking at the environmental pressures facing TreeHouse Foods, and honestly, the data from their latest 2025 Sustainability Report shows they are taking concrete steps, but the road to 2030 is still long.

TreeHouse Foods aims to reduce Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions by 25% by 2030, requiring immediate action.

The commitment to cut Scope 1 and 2 Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions by 25% from the 2022 baseline by the end of 2030 is a clear mandate for operational change right now. As of the end of 2024, TreeHouse Foods reported achieving a 6.6% reduction against that target. That means they've covered more than a quarter of the required reduction in just two years, which is good momentum, but it requires sustained, immediate action across all manufacturing sites to keep that pace up. This isn't just about reputation; it's about embedding energy efficiency into capital planning.

Water scarcity in key agricultural regions threatens the stability of ingredient supply chains.

Water is the lifeblood of agriculture, and frankly, the global water crisis is a direct threat to your ingredient sourcing stability. Reports indicate that demand for fresh water is expected to outstrip supply by 40% by the end of this decade, putting immense stress on regions where TreeHouse Foods sources key commodities. To manage their own footprint, the company reduced water withdrawn in manufacturing operations by nearly 17% from the 2022 baseline, moving toward a 20% reduction goal by 2030. Still, the risk remains upstream with suppliers.

Here's a quick look at their reported environmental progress against their 2030 targets:

Metric 2030 Goal 2024 Progress (vs. 2022 Baseline)
Scope 1 & 2 GHG Reduction 25% 6.6% reduction
Water Usage Reduction (Manufacturing) 20% Nearly 17% reduction
Food Loss & Waste Reduction 50% No specific 2024 progress number provided in the 2025 report summary
Packaging: Recyclable/Reusable/Compostable 100% Maintained 27% average Post-Consumer Recycled (PCR) content

Increased stakeholder pressure for sustainable packaging solutions and reduced food waste.

Retailer and consumer scrutiny on packaging waste is intense, and TreeHouse Foods is responding directly. They successfully eliminated approximately 700 metric tons of problematic and/or unnecessary plastic from their packaging portfolio in 2024. That's a tangible win. They are also maintaining a 27% average post-consumer recycled content across their packaging, which helps meet retailer demands for circularity. On the waste side, their 50% reduction goal for Food Loss & Waste by 2030 signals a major focus area for operational improvement, as food waste is increasingly highlighted as a critical climate action gap by industry bodies.

Climate change volatility directly impacts crop yields and commodity prices.

Climate volatility isn't a future risk; it's a current input cost driver. We've seen other multi-brand manufacturers struggle to source key ingredients like olives due to severe droughts in growing regions like Spain and Greece. For TreeHouse Foods, this translates directly into commodity price swings for things like sugar, cocoa, and grains, which are all sensitive to extreme weather. This volatility forces you to think about resilience in your sourcing strategy, not just cost. To be fair, their move to increase Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO)-certified palm oil by 7% shows they are engaging with the supply chain to mitigate some of these sourcing risks.

Finance: draft 13-week cash view incorporating potential Q1 2026 commodity price volatility by Friday.


Disclaimer

All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.

We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site—including articles or product references—constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.

All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.