The Pros and Cons of Using a Debt/Equity Ratio

The Pros and Cons of Using a Debt/Equity Ratio

Introduction


You're checking leverage and need a quick, practical read: the debt/equity ratio (debt divided by equity) is a simple leverage snapshot that's useful but incomplete. Debt/Equity = Total Debt / Shareholders' Equity, and you can use market equity for a market view or book equity for an accounting view - both tell different stories. Good first screen, not a final answer. Here's the quick math using FY2025 numbers: if a company reports Total Debt $750,000,000 and Shareholders' Equity $1,500,000,000, D/E = 0.50; what this hides: off‑balance-sheet items, preferreds, or market value swings can move the true leverage. It matters because D/E shifts perceived risk, the cost of capital, creditor covenants, and investor sentiment - so use it to triage, then dig deeper; next step - you or Finance: run both market‑equity and book‑equity D/E for FY2025 and flag material gaps by Friday.


Key Takeaways


  • Debt/Equity = Total Debt / Shareholders' Equity - quick snapshot (e.g., $750M / $1,500M = 0.50) but not a final answer.
  • Use market equity for a market view and book equity for accounting/covenant tests; both can diverge due to equity volatility or off‑balance items.
  • Adjust the ratio: subtract cash for Net Debt, add leases/pensions if material; consider alternatives (Debt/(Debt+Equity), Debt/Assets, Net Debt/EBITDA).
  • Don't rely alone - benchmark to industry/peers, track trends, and pair with interest coverage and maturity profile to assess true risk.
  • Practical rules: expect lower D/E in tech (<0.5) and higher in utilities (>1.0); red flags include D/E rising >30% YoY, short‑term debt >30% of total, or interest coverage <3x - actions: refinance, cut payouts, hedge rates, or raise equity.


How the ratio is calculated and key variations


Total debt, net debt, and practical calculation steps


You're checking leverage for FY2025 and need a repeatable number you can act on.

Total debt = short-term debt + long-term debt reported on the balance sheet. To get a cleaner view of true leverage, subtract cash and cash equivalents to get Net Debt. That's the number lenders and credit analysts usually care about.

Steps to calculate (use FY2025 line items):

  • Pull short-term debt and long-term debt from the FY2025 balance sheet.
  • Pull cash & equivalents from the same FY2025 statement.
  • Compute Total Debt and Net Debt (Total Debt - Cash).
  • Divide by the chosen equity measure (book or market) to get D/E or Net D/E.

Example using FY2025 figures: Total Debt = $1,200m, Cash = $200m, Book Equity = $800m. Net Debt = $1,000m. So D/E = 1,200 / 800 = 1.50; Net D/E = 1,000 / 800 = 1.25. Here's the quick math: Net Debt pulls the balance sheet closer to what creditors actually face.

What this hides: off-balance commitments (guarantees, undrawn RCFs) and large restricted cash balances-check notes in FY2025 filings. If operating leases are material, include their present value unless already on-balance under IFRS 16/ASC 842.

Market equity vs book equity - when to use which


You need a timely leverage view or an accounting/regulatory one - pick your equity metric accordingly.

Use market equity (shares outstanding × FY2025 year-end price) when you want a real-time sense of how leveraged the equity holders' position is. Use book equity (shareholders' equity from the FY2025 balance sheet) when assessing covenant tests, regulatory ratios, or accounting leverage.

Steps and best practices:

  • For market D/E: take the FY2025 closing share price on your chosen date and multiply by diluted shares outstanding at FY2025 year-end.
  • For book D/E: use total equity (common equity) from the FY2025 balance sheet; exclude minority interest unless you need consolidated leverage.
  • Document which you used and why in your model assumptions section.

Example: FY2025 market cap = $1,000m (200m shares × $5). With Total Debt = $1,200m, D/E (market) = 1,200 / 1,000 = 1.20. Same balance-sheet D/E (book) was 1.50. One-liner: market moves can change D/E overnight; book values move only when the balance sheet changes.

Practical caution: equity volatility can make market D/E misleading around earnings or big one-offs-run both and stress-test share-price moves (±20% and ±50%) to see sensitivity.

Alternative leverage measures and when to prefer each


You'll get better decisions if you don't treat D/E as the only lever-use complementary ratios depending on your question.

Key alternatives:

  • Debt-to-capital: Debt / (Debt + Equity). Good for showing the debt share of total financed capital.
  • Debt/Assets: Total Debt / Total Assets. Useful for asset-heavy firms and recovery analysis.
  • Debt/EBITDA (or Net Debt/EBITDA): Leverage relative to operating cash flow; a coverage proxy used by lenders and rating agencies.

Example (FY2025): with D/E = 1.50 we get debt-to-capital = 1.5 / (1 + 1.5) = 60%. If EBITDA = $300m, then Debt/EBITDA = 1,200 / 300 = 4.0x and Net Debt/EBITDA = 1,000 / 300 = 3.33x. One-liner: pick Debt/EBITDA for default risk and Debt-to-capital for capital structure targets.

Practical rules:

  • Use Net Debt/EBITDA for covenant stress tests; include pro-forma impacts from FY2025 M&A or buybacks.
  • Compare to industry medians (utilities vs SaaS differ a lot); store peer medians from FY2025 for like-for-like context.
  • Adjust for off-balance items: pensions, guarantees, and undrawn RCFs increase effective leverage-add them to debt where material.

What to do next: run D/E, Net Debt/EBITDA, and debt-to-capital on your FY2025 base case and a downside case (EBITDA -20%) to see covenant and rating impacts-finance should tag any covenant at risk for immediate review (defintely flag ones breaching thresholds).


Pros of the debt/equity ratio


Quick comparability across firms and time, and how to run a fast screen


You're comparing a set of companies and need a fast filter - D/E gives a single, comparable leverage snapshot you can compute from published FY2025 balance sheets.

Start with these steps:

  • Pull FY2025 Total Debt and Shareholders Equity from the latest 10-K or annual report.
  • Decide market versus book equity: use market equity for timely peer comparisons; use book equity for regulatory or loan tests.
  • Normalize by size: convert to debt-to-capital (see next section) or use ratios per dollar of revenue to compare companies with different scales.
  • Flag outliers for deeper review, not for immediate trade decisions.

Best practice: benchmark each company to an industry median and to three closest peers using FY2025 data, then rank by percentile rather than absolute cutoff.

One-liner: use D/E to short-list names, then dig into details.

What D/E reveals about financing mix, tax shields, and cost of capital


D/E shows how much capital comes from lenders versus owners, which drives bankruptcy risk, interest exposure, and the value of the interest tax shield (interest paid reduces taxable income).

Concrete steps and examples using FY2025 figures:

  • Compute financing mix: if FY2025 Total Debt = $150m and Shareholders Equity = $100m, D/E = 1.5; debt share of capital = 60% (see next subsection math).
  • Estimate tax shield: if interest expense in FY2025 = $15m and tax rate = 25%, annual tax shield ≈ $3.75m (interest × tax rate).
  • Map to WACC (weighted average cost of capital): use after-tax cost of debt (Rd × (1-tax rate)) and cost of equity (Re). Recompute WACC for FY2025 capital mix to see how incremental debt changes WACC.
  • Translate to covenant risk: high D/E raises probability of covenant breaches when EBITDA falls - quantify by modeling interest and principal amortization versus forecasted cash flows.

Best practice: run a simple WACC sensitivity for FY2025 with ±1 percentage point on Rd and Re and with two D/E scenarios to show funding cost tradeoffs.

One-liner: D/E signals the financing mix and the size of the tax benefit, but you must convert that into dollars to make it actionable.

How the ratio informs bankruptcy risk, covenant setting, and quick math example


D/E highlights structural risk - more debt means fixed obligations. Use D/E alongside coverage metrics to assess default probability.

Practical checklist for FY2025 risk assessment:

  • Compute interest coverage: EBIT (FY2025) ÷ Interest expense (FY2025). If EBIT = $100m and interest = $10m, coverage = 10x - healthy; if interest = $40m, coverage = 2.5x - risky.
  • Check maturity profile: short-term debt > 30% of total debt is a red flag; stress refinance ability over 12-24 months.
  • Adjust D/E for cash to get Net Debt/Equity: Net Debt = Total Debt - Cash. If Cash = $20m in FY2025, Net Debt = $130m and Net D/E = 1.3.
  • Set covenant limits using scenario runs: simulate EBITDA declines (-10%, -20%, -30%) and map to coverage, then set covenant triggers one notch above the weakest feasible scenario.

Here's the quick math: D/E = Total Debt / Equity. With D/E = 1.5, debt share of capital = 1.5 / (1 + 1.5) = 60%.

What this estimate hides: maturity, interest rate, off-balance liabilities, and equity volatility - so always pair D/E with coverage and liquidity checks. Also, defintely model buybacks and classification changes, since those move D/E fast.

One-liner: D/E gives a clear signal; convert it to coverage, cash-flow stress tests, and covenant impacts to act. Finance: run FY2025 D/E, Net Debt/EBITDA, and interest coverage for your top five holdings by Friday and report covenant breach probabilities.


The cons of the debt/equity ratio: what it hides


Quick takeaway: the debt/equity ratio is a blunt snapshot that can mislead unless you adjust for cash, off-balance obligations, market swings, and the company's interest and maturity profile. Use it as a red-flag tool, then dig into the details.

What the ratio omits from the balance sheet


The basic D/E calculation - Total Debt divided by Shareholders Equity - ignores cash and many liabilities that matter. If a firm reports $1,200m total debt and $400m cash in FY2025, Net Debt is $800m, not $1,200m. That changes leverage measures materially.

Steps you should follow every time:

  • Compute Net Debt = Total Debt - Cash and equivalents.
  • Capitalize operating leases and add pension deficits per IFRS 16 / ASC 842 adjustments.
  • Include contingent liabilities (guarantees, long-term vendor commitments) where material.
  • Recompute Net Debt/Equity and Debt/(Debt+Equity) after adjustments.

One-liner: always convert headline D/E into an adjusted leverage number that includes cash and off-balance items.

What this hides and how to respond: if adjusted Net Debt/Equity jumps >20% versus headline D/E, treat the headline as misleading and flag for model rework; document which items moved the leverage and by how much.

Market-based equity volatility and timing effects


Using market equity (share price × shares outstanding) makes D/E timely but volatile. Overnight stock moves can swing D/E dramatically even when the company's debt, operations, and cash haven't changed.

Practical guidance:

  • Report both market-based and book-based D/E for FY2025 views.
  • Smooth market D/E with a 30-day average market cap when you need a stable metric.
  • Flag volatile changes tied to share price: if market cap falls 25% in a week, re-evaluate investor covenants and refinancing plans.
  • For regulatory or loan covenant analysis, prefer book equity unless the contract specifies market measures.

One-liner: market D/E is real-time but noisy - use multi-period averages or both measures.

Quick example: if equity market cap drops from $2,400m to $1,800m in FY2025, market D/E can rise ~33% without any change in operations - defintely investigate before acting.

Context matters: industry norms, interest burden, and liquidity


A single D/E cutoff misleads because capital norms and interest loads vary by industry and business model. Utilities often run high leverage; SaaS firms run low. D/E tells you little about the company's ability to service the debt.

Actions and checks you must run alongside D/E:

  • Benchmark to an industry cohort median and the top 5 peers for FY2025.
  • Compute interest coverage = EBIT / Interest; flag if coverage < 3x.
  • Run Net Debt / EBITDA (TTM) and set thresholds (e.g., > 4.0x = elevated risk for many sectors).
  • Map debt maturities: if short-term debt > 30% of total debt, prepare refinancing stress tests.
  • Scenario test: drop EBITDA 20% and recalc covenants, ratings impact, and required liquidity draws.

One-liner: D/E is context-free - pair it with coverage, maturity, and peer benchmarks to judge risk.

What to watch in FY2025 data: if D/E rises while interest coverage falls below 3x or short-term maturities exceed 30%, treat the position as high-priority for refinancing or equity raise planning.


How to use the ratio properly


You're setting or reviewing leverage targets for a portfolio or company; use the debt/equity ratio as a starting lens, then test with coverage, cash, and scenarios so you don't get surprised. Quick takeaway: benchmark, adjust, and stress-test.

Benchmark to peers and industry medians, not an absolute threshold


You should compare a firm's debt/equity to a matched peer set and the industry median, because capital norms differ by sector and business model.

Steps to follow:

  • Define peer cohort: same sub-industry, similar size, and capital intensity.
  • Use three-year medians to smooth market swings.
  • Prefer market-cap weighting for investor view; use book equity for loan/regulatory tests.
  • Flag outliers: firms outside the peer IQR (interquartile range) need deeper review.

Best practices:

  • Keep cohorts small (8-12 firms) to avoid irrelevant comparisons.
  • Segment by lifecycle: high-growth tech vs mature utilities.
  • Document the benchmark source and date (e.g., comp set as of fiscal year ended 2025).

One-liner: benchmark, don't grade on a curve you made up.

Pair the ratio with coverage, net leverage, and maturity profile


The debt/equity ratio alone misses cost and timing of debt. Always pair it with interest coverage (EBIT/Interest), Net Debt/EBITDA, and the debt maturity ladder.

Exact checks to run:

  • Interest coverage: calculate EBIT ÷ cash interest paid for FY ended 2025.
  • Net leverage: (Total debt - cash) ÷ EBITDA (TTM or FY 2025).
  • Maturity profile: percent of debt maturing within 12 months.

Practical thresholds (rule-of-thumb):

  • Interest coverage 3x = caution; 1.5-2x = serious risk.
  • Net Debt/EBITDA > 4x in cyclical sectors = high risk.
  • Short-term debt > 30% of total debt = refinancing pressure.

One-liner: pair leverage with cash-flow cover and when the bills are due.

Adjust for cash, leases, off-balance items, track trends, and run scenarios


Adjustments matter: convert operating leases (IFRS 16/ASC 842) into debt-equivalents, include pension deficits and guarantees, and subtract cash to get Net Debt. That gives a truer picture of serviceable leverage.

Concrete adjustments to make for FY 2025 data:

  • Add: present value of lease liabilities, pension deficits, guaranteed obligations.
  • Subtract: unrestricted cash and short-term investments usable for debt service.
  • Report both book-based and market-based equity versions.

Track trends and red flags:

  • Rising D/E + falling EBITDA = red flag. If D/E rises > 30% year-over-year, escalate review.
  • Watch buybacks and reclassifications that mask leverage moves.

Run this scenario analysis (step-by-step):

  • Base case: Net Debt = 300, EBITDA = 100 (FY 2025) → Net Debt/EBITDA = 3.0x.
  • Stress case: EBITDA falls 20% → EBITDA = 80 → Net Debt/EBITDA = 3.75x.
  • Coverage effect: if cash interest = 40, base coverage = 100/40 = 2.5x; after shock coverage = 80/40 = 2.0x.
  • Assess covenant triggers: if covenant max is 3.5x, the stressed state breaches the covenant and could accelerate defaults or require waivers.
  • Map rating impact: higher leverage and lower coverage typically move a credit one notch per material breach; quantify with rating agency criteria for the sector.

Actions if scenario looks bad: refinance long-term, draw contingency liquidity, suspend buybacks, or raise equity. Finance should run these scenarios on FY 2025 numbers for top exposures and produce a short remediation plan.

One-liner: adjust, trend, stress - then pick one clear repair action.


Practical thresholds, red flags, and actions


You're checking leverage and need clear thresholds, fast signs of trouble, and concrete fixes you can start today. The quick takeaway: use industry-aware D/E bands, watch sudden jumps and short-term maturities, and pair D/E with coverage and cash-flow tests.

Expectations by industry and capital-intensity


You're comparing companies across very different capital structures; a single D/E cutoff misleads. Expect lower leverage in high-growth software and biotech where earnings are volatile and reinvestment matters - typically D/E often 0.5. Expect higher leverage in utilities, telecom, and regulated infrastructure where cash flows are stable - often D/E > 1.0. Financials and real estate investment trusts (REITs) use different metrics; for banks, risk-weighted capital is primary, not plain D/E.

Practical steps: benchmark to a peer cohort over the last four fiscal years, use market-equity for current leverage and book-equity for covenant or regulatory comparisons, and normalize earnings for one-off items before interpreting D/E. One-liner: match the band to the business, not a universal rule.

Early warning signs and red flags


Watch the pace and the composition of leverage, not just the headline ratio. Red flags to act on immediately: year-over-year D/E increase > 30%; short-term debt > 30% of total debt; and interest coverage (EBIT/Interest) < 3x. Also flag rapid falls in EBITDA while D/E rises, and large off-balance obligations (leases, pensions) that inflate effective leverage.

Practical monitoring: run a rolling 12-month D/E and Net Debt/EBITDA series, set alerts for the thresholds above, and overlay covenant triggers (maintenance covenants, interest cover tests). One-liner: sudden jumps or heavy near-term maturities are your fastest signal of liquidity stress.

Actions to repair leverage and tactical moves


Act based on severity and timing. Immediate (30-90 days): open lender dialogue, seek covenant waivers or temporary amendments, suspend buybacks, and tighten discretionary cash outflows. Medium term (90-270 days): refinance to extend maturities, raise equity (accelerated bookbuild or rights issue), or sell non-core assets to pay down debt. Longer term: re-optimize capital structure - hedge interest-rate exposure, shift to fixed-rate debt, or restructure operating leases to reduce leverage volatility.

Operational checklist: run a 13-week cash forecast, stress EBITDA - 20% to map covenant breaches, and produce a refinancing runway showing maturities, available revolver capacity, and next callable dates. One-liner: shorter maturities and low coverage force hard choices fast.

Quick numeric check you can run now: if EBITDA = 100 and interest = 10, coverage = 10x - healthy; if interest = 40, coverage = 2.5x - risky, defintely review lender covenants and liquidity sources.

Next step: Finance - run D/E, Net Debt/EBITDA, and interest coverage for your top five holdings (latest 2025 fiscal year) and deliver the stress-test workbook by Friday.


Debt/Equity: practical use and immediate actions


Use debt/equity as an efficient screening tool


You're screening holdings quickly and need a repeatable rule to rank leverage across names; use debt/equity as a first-pass filter, not a final judgment. Good first screen, not a final answer.

Steps to run the screen:

  • Pull Total Debt (short + long term) and Shareholders Equity from FY2025 balance sheet.
  • Decide metric: use market equity for timely view, book equity for covenant/regulatory checks.
  • Compute Debt/Equity = Total Debt / Equity; compute Net Debt/Equity = (Total Debt - Cash) / Equity.
  • Adjust for leases (IFRS 16 / ASC 842), pensions, guarantees before comparing peers.

Best practices and pitfall checks:

  • Benchmark to industry median, not an absolute cutoff.
  • Prefer Net Debt for capital structure comparisons.
  • Watch market-cap volatility; a sharp share-price move can swing market-based D/E overnight.

Example math: if D/E = 1.5, debt is 60% of capital (1.5 / (1 + 1.5) = 0.60).

Pair the ratio with companion metrics and adjustments


You're deciding whether a high or low D/E is actionable; pair it with coverage, liquidity, and maturity metrics to see the full risk picture. One clear check: coverage and maturities change the story.

Companion metrics to compute (FY2025 values):

  • Interest coverage = EBIT / Interest expense - red flag if below 3x.
  • Net Debt / EBITDA (LTM or FY2025) - investment-grade often 2.5x, speculative often > 5x.
  • Short-term debt / Total debt - watch if > 30%.
  • Debt to capital (Debt / (Debt + Equity)) as an alternative percent view.

Scenario testing and quick math (showing limits):

  • Quick math: Net Debt $250 million / EBITDA $100 million = 2.5x.
  • If EBITDA falls 20% (FY2025 LTM: $100 million$80 million), Net Debt/EBITDA → 3.13x. What this estimate hides: covenant definitions, pro forma adjustments, one-offs.
  • Coverage example: EBITDA = $100, interest = $10 → coverage = 10x (healthy); if interest = $40 → coverage = 2.5x (defintely review).

Immediate next steps and owner responsibilities


You're ready for action: run the metrics for your top holdings this week and assign clear owners and deadlines. Finance: update models by Friday.

Concrete checklist for Finance (deliver by Friday):

  • For each top 5 holding, pull FY2025 Total Debt, Cash, Equity (book), market cap (market equity), LTM/FY2025 EBITDA, interest expense, and debt maturities.
  • Adjust balances for IFRS 16 / ASC 842 leases, pensions, and explicit guarantees; compute Net Debt and Net Debt/EBITDA.
  • Compute Interest Coverage (EBIT / Interest) and Short-term Debt share; flag if coverage < 3x or short-term debt > 30%.
  • Run two scenarios: EBITDA - 20% and interest rates + 200 bps; show covenant breaches and rating-impact triggers.
  • Produce a one-page dashboard: current metrics, scenario outcomes, top 3 recommended actions per flagged name (refinance, dividend pause, equity raise, hedge rates).

Time plan and owner: Gather data by Thursday, Finance to update models and dashboard by Friday, send flagged list to Portfolio Manager Monday morning. If onboarding or data lags exceed 48 hours, expect delayed decisions and higher execution risk.


DCF model

All DCF Excel Templates

    5-Year Financial Model

    40+ Charts & Metrics

    DCF & Multiple Valuation

    Free Email Support


Disclaimer

All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.

We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site—including articles or product references—constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.

All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.