FS Bancorp, Inc. (FSBW) Porter's Five Forces Analysis

FS Bancorp, Inc. (FSBW): 5 FORCES Analysis [Nov-2025 Updated]

US | Financial Services | Banks - Regional | NASDAQ
FS Bancorp, Inc. (FSBW) Porter's Five Forces Analysis

Fully Editable: Tailor To Your Needs In Excel Or Sheets

Professional Design: Trusted, Industry-Standard Templates

Investor-Approved Valuation Models

MAC/PC Compatible, Fully Unlocked

No Expertise Is Needed; Easy To Follow

FS Bancorp, Inc. (FSBW) Bundle

Get Full Bundle:
$12 $7
$12 $7
$12 $7
$12 $7
$25 $15
$12 $7
$12 $7
$12 $7
$12 $7

TOTAL:

You're looking for a clear-eyed assessment of FS Bancorp, Inc.'s competitive footing as we head into late 2025, so I've mapped out the five forces using their most recent numbers. What this shows is a classic regional bank squeeze: while high regulatory capital requirements keep most new entrants at bay, customers have near-zero switching costs for loans across their $\mathbf{\$2.60}$ billion portfolio, and the rising cost of funds-especially on their $\mathbf{\$351.7}$ million in rate-sensitive brokered deposits-gives suppliers real leverage. With intense rivalry in the Pacific Northwest and FinTechs offering easy substitutes, understanding these pressures is defintely key to valuing FS Bancorp, Inc. right now; let's break down each force below.

FS Bancorp, Inc. (FSBW) - Porter's Five Forces: Bargaining power of suppliers

When you look at FS Bancorp, Inc. (FSBW)'s funding structure, the suppliers-primarily depositors and the wholesale funding markets-hold significant sway, especially in the current rate environment. The cost of money is the key lever here, and it's definitely moving.

The increased interest rate environment directly translates to an increased cost of funds for FS Bancorp, Inc. (FSBW). We saw this pressure in the third quarter of 2025; total interest expense rose by $1.5 million year-over-year for the quarter ending September 30, 2025. While the Net Interest Margin (NIM) remained strong at 4.37% for Q3 2025, up slightly from 4.35% in the same period last year, managing that cost of funds against asset yields is a constant balancing act against supplier demands.

Reliance on rate-sensitive wholesale funding sources elevates this supplier power. For instance, in the first quarter of 2025, FS Bancorp, Inc. (FSBW) leaned on brokered deposits, which totaled $351.7 million. That's a substantial chunk of the $2.62 billion in total deposits reported at that time. While management actively worked to reduce wholesale funding, evidenced by borrowings falling significantly in Q3 2025, the need to replace maturing deposits or fund loan growth often pushes the bank back toward these more price-sensitive sources. By the end of Q3 2025, total deposits grew to $2.69 billion, with growth being primarily attributed to brokered certificates of deposit again, showing this reliance persists.

Here's a quick look at how the funding profile shifted across the first half of 2025:

Metric Q4 2024 Q1 2025 Q2 2025 Q3 2025
Total Deposits (in Billions) $2.43 $2.62 $2.55 $2.69
Brokered CDs (in Millions) N/A $351.7 Decrease of $59.1M (from Q1) Primary driver of growth
Net Interest Margin (NIM) 4.31% 4.32% N/A 4.37%

On the core depositor side, the bargaining power is arguably lower, but the threat is different. You don't have a single large supplier, but rather many small ones whose loyalty is tested daily by digital options. Switching costs for these core depositors are low because digital banking makes moving funds easy. This means FS Bancorp, Inc. (FSBW) must remain competitive on its non-brokered deposit rates to retain its stickier, less expensive funding base. Noninterest-bearing deposits were $676.7 million at the end of Q1 2025, a key source of low-cost funding that the bank must protect.

The biggest, non-negotiable supplier, of course, is the regulatory apparatus. Agencies like the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) dictate the rules of engagement-capital adequacy, lending standards, and compliance-which FS Bancorp, Inc. (FSBW) must adhere to without negotiation. This sets the operational floor and cost structure.

  • Regulatory compliance imposes fixed, non-negotiable operating costs.
  • Capital ratios must exceed minimums: Tier 1 leverage was 11.0% in Q3 2025.
  • Brokered deposits are rate-sensitive and subject to regulatory scrutiny.
  • Core deposit retention depends on competitive, digitally accessible rates.

Finance: draft a sensitivity analysis on a 50 basis point increase in average cost of funds by end of Q1 2026.

FS Bancorp, Inc. (FSBW) - Porter's Five Forces: Bargaining power of customers

For basic deposit accounts, switching costs for the average retail customer are defintely low in the current environment. FS Bancorp, Inc. holds total deposits of approximately $2.69 billion as of September 30, 2025, which means a significant portion of this funding base is highly sensitive to rate competition. You know how easy it is to move a checking or savings account today.

When it comes to lending, borrowers have high transparency, which directly impacts FS Bancorp, Inc.'s pricing power. For the firm's total loans receivable, net, which stood at $2.60 billion at the end of Q3 2025, rates are easily benchmarked across the market. This pressure is felt across the entire book, though perhaps most acutely in standardized products.

Here's a quick look at the scale of the customer-facing balance sheet as of the third quarter of 2025:

Metric Amount (as of September 30, 2025)
Total Deposits $2.69 billion
Loans Receivable, Net $2.60 billion
Total Assets $3,208,825 thousand

FS Bancorp, Inc.'s focus on small- and middle-market businesses and individuals in Washington and Oregon does introduce some relationship stickiness, which is a mitigating factor. This is supported by the physical presence across the region. The bank operates through 27 neighborhood branches across Washington and Oregon, which helps cement local ties that digital-only competitors can't easily replicate.

For consumer credit, the digital landscape amplifies buyer power. In Q1 2025, consumer loans totaled $608.9 million, with home improvement loans making up 87.4% of that segment. Digital platforms simplify the process of comparing rates for these products, meaning FS Bancorp, Inc. must price competitively or rely heavily on the relationship aspect you build face-to-face.

  • Consumer loans decreased to $608.9 million in Q1 2025.
  • Home improvement loans represented 87.4% of consumer loans in Q1 2025.
  • The bank serves customers across King, Kitsap, Pierce, Snohomish, Jefferson, Clallam, Thurston, Grays Harbor, Klickitat, Lincoln, Malheur, and Tillamook counties.

FS Bancorp, Inc. (FSBW) - Porter's Five Forces: Competitive rivalry

You're looking at the competitive intensity FS Bancorp, Inc. faces in its core markets, and honestly, it's a grind. The rivalry force here is definitely high because the bank operates in the mature Pacific Northwest, specifically the Puget Sound and Oregon markets, where established, larger regional banks are already deeply entrenched. That means winning market share isn't about finding an empty field; it's about out-hustling the competition for every deposit dollar and loan origination. It's a relationship game, and you have to prove you're better, not just different.

Cost management is a key battleground in this rivalry, and the numbers show some pressure building. The efficiency ratio, which tells you how much it costs to generate a dollar of revenue, is a good barometer here. For Q1 2025, FS Bancorp, Inc.'s efficiency ratio ticked up to 69.4%. That's higher than the 68.2% seen in Q4 2024 and noticeably worse than the 66.4% reported year-over-year for Q1 2024. This suggests that while revenue metrics like Net Interest Income (NII) were up to $31.0 million in Q1 2025, noninterest expenses-like salaries and operations-are rising faster, squeezing profitability. For Q3 2025, net income was $9.2 Million on $1.18 diluted EPS, showing the ongoing challenge of maintaining margins against operational costs and competitive pricing.

FS Bancorp, Inc. fights this rivalry by leaning hard into differentiation, which is where its community bank model comes into play. They aren't trying to be the biggest; they focus on being the most local and specialized. They serve customers across 27 neighborhood branches in Washington and Oregon. This local focus supports specialized lending programs aimed at strengthening those specific communities.

Here's a quick look at the core business metrics that define the scale of the rivalry you're up against:

Metric Value (Q1 2025 or Latest) Context
Efficiency Ratio 69.4% (Q1 2025) Up from 66.4% YoY, indicating rising cost pressure
Net Income $9.2 Million (Q3 2025) Latest reported quarterly profitability
Diluted EPS $1.18 (Q3 2025) Latest reported earnings per share
Total Assets $3.21 Billion (Sept 30, 2025) Total assets as of the end of Q3 2025
Total Loans Receivable $2.60 Billion (Sept 30, 2025) Loan portfolio size at the end of Q3 2025
CRE Loans (as % of total) 23.3% (Dec 31, 2024) A key lending segment concentration

The bank's strategy to counter the high rivalry centers on relationship banking and specific niches. They aren't just offering standard checking accounts; they are actively involved in local support, sponsoring things like food drives and local celebrations. On the lending side, this translates into specific programs that larger, more generalized banks might overlook or service poorly.

The key elements driving the high competitive rivalry for FS Bancorp, Inc. include:

  • Intense local competition in the Puget Sound region.
  • Mature market for traditional deposit services.
  • Need to manage rising noninterest expenses.
  • Focus on relationship-based commercial lending.
  • Specialized lending to boat dealerships and contractors.

The differentiation through specialized lending is concrete. For instance, FS Bancorp, Inc. services lending programs for home buyers, local contractors, builders, mortgage companies, and even boat dealerships. Furthermore, while consumer loans have seen sequential contraction, the bank maintains strong CRE and 1-4 family loan pipelines. The challenge is ensuring these specialized areas-like the home improvement loan book which saw higher net charge-offs-don't become a drag while competing on price for core deposits, which surged by 11.8% in Q1 2025, largely through brokered CDs.

Finance: review the Q3 2025 expense trends against the Q1 2025 efficiency ratio of 69.4% by next Tuesday.

FS Bancorp, Inc. (FSBW) - Porter's Five Forces: Threat of substitutes

You're looking at the competitive landscape for FS Bancorp, Inc. (FSBW) and wondering where the real pressure is coming from outside the traditional bank rivalry. The threat of substitutes is significant because modern finance offers many ways for customers to get the same service-a loan or a place to keep their cash-without ever stepping into a 1st Security Bank branch. Honestly, this is where regional banks often feel the squeeze the most.

Non-bank mortgage originators for their home lending segment

The home lending segment faces direct competition from non-bank originators who have captured the majority share of the market. These specialized firms often move faster and focus purely on origination volume, which can put pressure on a community bank's market share and pricing flexibility. For instance, in the first half of 2025, nonbanks accounted for 65.1% of all mortgage originations, while banks, including FSBW, held a 27.9% share, with credit unions at 7.0%. This trend shows that for new home purchases, non-banks are the dominant player, having made 66.1% of those loans in 2024. The overall market is still growing, with Fitch projecting total originations to hit $1.9 trillion in 2025, an 18% increase year-over-year. FS Bancorp, Inc. needs to keep a close eye on how its home lending segment, which is a key part of its business, competes against these highly focused players.

Here's a snapshot of the origination market structure in H1 2025:

Institution Type Market Share of Originations (H1 2025) 2024 Home Purchase Share
Nonbanks 65.1% 66.1%
Banks (Depository Institutions) 27.9% N/A (Banks held 30.1% overall in 2024)
Credit Unions 7.0% N/A

FinTech apps for consumer deposits and small, unsecured loans

FinTechs are a major substitute threat for deposit gathering, especially among retail consumers. The U.S. fintech market itself was valued at $58.01 billion in 2025 and is expected to nearly double to $118.77 billion by 2030. The neobanking segment, which is essentially branch-free banking delivered via apps, is forecast to grow even faster, with a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 21.67% through 2030. While FS Bancorp, Inc. saw its total deposits rise to $2.69 billion in Q3 2025, a portion of that growth came from brokered deposits, suggesting reliance on wholesale funding sources rather than organic retail growth that FinTechs target. Retail consumers made up 63.38% of the fintech market share in 2024. Furthermore, some of these digital players are actively moving into lending, which directly substitutes for FSBW's consumer loan products.

The pressure points from FinTech substitutes include:

  • Neobanks targeting primary banking relationships.
  • Digital payment apps capturing transaction flow.
  • FinTech lending platforms offering faster unsecured credit decisions.
  • Mobile app interfaces setting higher customer experience standards.

Direct capital markets funding for larger commercial real estate (CRE) projects

For FS Bancorp, Inc.'s larger commercial clients, especially those in real estate development, direct access to capital markets acts as a powerful substitute for traditional bank construction and CRE loans. We saw evidence of this market's activity in the first half of 2025, where debt issuance by non-bank mortgage companies hit its highest level since 2021. Specifically, large nonbanks issued $7.2 billion in unsecured debt during H1 2025. This shows that sophisticated borrowers can bypass bank balance sheets entirely. To be fair, FS Bancorp, Inc. is still seeing CRE activity, as its Q3 2025 loan growth was supported by commercial and speculative construction/development loans increasing by $26.0 million. Still, the existence of robust, high-volume capital markets funding means that the largest, most lucrative CRE deals might flow elsewhere, leaving regional banks to compete for smaller or more specialized projects.

Credit unions offer a tax-advantaged substitute for retail banking products

Credit unions present a unique substitute threat because their structure offers a tax advantage over for-profit banks like FS Bancorp, Inc. This difference can translate into more competitive pricing on retail products, particularly deposits. While credit union deposit growth slowed post-pandemic, TruStage projected 6% growth for credit union shares in 2025. In Q3 2024, the total annualized deposit change for credit unions was 2%. Even in the mortgage space, credit unions accounted for 7.0% of originations in H1 2025. You have to respect the tax shield they operate under; it's a structural advantage that allows them to be aggressive on the retail side, drawing away deposits that might otherwise flow to 1st Security Bank.

FS Bancorp, Inc. (FSBW) - Porter's Five Forces: Threat of new entrants

The threat of new entrants for FS Bancorp, Inc. remains relatively low, primarily due to the substantial upfront capital and regulatory hurdles inherent in starting a chartered bank. You see this clearly when comparing the required capital to start a de novo institution against the operational strength FS Bancorp, Inc. already maintains.

The initial regulatory capital requirement is the most significant deterrent. For a new community bank, the minimum initial regulatory capital and charter application costs are estimated to range from $20,000,000 to $31,133,500. Total estimated startup costs can climb as high as $66,533,500. This massive initial outlay immediately filters out most potential competitors.

Consider the capital position FS Bancorp, Inc. held as of late 2025. For Q3 2025, the bank reported a Total Risk-Based Capital ratio of 14.1% (or 13.8%), significantly exceeding the general 'well-capitalized' threshold for Total Capital Ratio of 10.0%. For large banks, the minimum CET1 capital requirement, including the Stress Capital Buffer, was set at 7.0% as of late 2025.

Here's a quick look at the required capital floor versus FSBW's Q3 2025 reported levels:

Capital Metric Minimum Well-Capitalized Requirement FS Bancorp, Inc. (FSBW) Q3 2025 Reported Level
Tier 1 Leverage Ratio 5.0% 11.2% / 11.0%
Total Capital Ratio (Risk-Based) 10.0% 14.1% / 13.8%
CET1 Capital Ratio (Risk-Based) 6.5% Data not directly provided for this specific ratio in Q3 2025 results, but Total Capital is high.

The need for a physical branch network is another major entry cost. FS Bancorp, Inc. operates 27 bank branches. Establishing a comparable footprint requires significant capital expenditure. Estimates for building a new freestanding branch, excluding land, averaged around $1,500,000 in 2025 budgets, with total costs potentially reaching $5,000,000 per location depending on complexity and location. Leasing and renovating an existing space is less, estimated between $500,000 and $1,500,000.

The cost components for a new physical presence include:

  • Land Acquisition: Ranges from $300,000 to $2,000,000.
  • Construction Costs: Average cost per square foot near $570.
  • Technology & Security: Initial investment for core systems can be $1,000,000 to $25,000,000.

FinTech companies present a nuanced threat. They can enter specific niches, like payments or specialized lending, without needing a full bank charter, which bypasses the capital and branch requirements mentioned above. However, offering comprehensive deposit-taking and lending services still requires a charter or a costly partnership with an existing bank.

Finally, for a community-focused institution like FS Bancorp, Inc., the established brand trust within Washington and Oregon markets is a significant intangible barrier. Replicating the decade-plus of local relationships and community embeddedness that supports deposit stability is not something a new entrant can buy quickly.


Disclaimer

All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.

We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site—including articles or product references—constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.

All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.