Kidpik Corp. (PIK) Bundle
You're looking at Kidpik Corp. (PIK) because the subscription box model still holds promise, but honestly, the financial reality of 2025 demands a cold, hard look at the balance sheet. The direct takeaway is this: the company's financial story is less about core growth and more about corporate survival, pivoting hard on a merger after a major operational drawdown. We saw the writing on the wall with the Q3 2024 results, where net revenue plunged by a staggering 69.2% year-over-year to just $1.0 million, and the company posted a net loss of $0.9 million, even while eliminating marketing and new inventory purchases to conserve cash. Here's the quick math: when your sales drop that fast, your working capital (the difference between current assets and current liabilities) is defintely under pressure, which is why the announcement on February 6, 2025, of their intention to delist from Nasdaq and focus on the merger with Nina Footwear Corp. was a necessary, if painful, strategic move. This isn't a turnaround story; it's a strategic exit, and you need to understand the implications of that merger-expected to close in the first quarter of 2025-on the new entity's future cash flow and debt structure before making any investment decision.
Revenue Analysis
The revenue picture for Kidpik Corp. (PIK) in 2025 is defintely a tale of two companies: the rapid dismantling of the old subscription model and the strategic pivot into the Nina Footwear Corp. business. You need to look past the immediate decline in the legacy segment because the real opportunity is in the new, combined entity. The near-term risk is clear, but the new growth strategy is already in motion.
The legacy subscription-based e-commerce revenue stream saw a massive contraction leading up to the May 2025 merger. For the third quarter of 2024, the company reported net revenue of just $1.0 million, which was a year-over-year decrease of 69.2%. This sharp drop was intentional, a direct result of management eliminating marketing expenditures for subscription services and ceasing new inventory purchases to clear out existing stock in anticipation of the combination.
Historically, the primary revenue source was the personalized children's clothing subscription service, with this recurring revenue stream generating approximately $13.4 million in 2023. That's a 62% recurring revenue stream from subscription boxes alone. Now, the new revenue streams for the combined entity, which plans to change its name to Nina Holding Corp., are fundamentally different.
Here's the quick math on the shift:
- Old Segment: Direct-to-consumer online clothing subscription boxes, Amazon, and online website sales.
- New Segment: Nina Footwear's business, which includes women's and kids' dress shoes and accessories.
- New Focus: Brand and category extensions, international expansion, and the resurrection of the Delman shoe brand.
The merger, which closed in May 2025, is expected to increase the combined company's revenue, cash flow, and prospects. The new management's focus is on growing the Nina Footwear brand, which means the contribution of the original Kidpik clothing segment to overall revenue will continue to shrink, becoming a minor part of the new operation. The trailing twelve months (TTM) revenue for Kidpik prior to the merger was around $7.78 million, which sets a low baseline for the legacy business. The investment decision now hinges entirely on the new footwear and accessories business's ability to execute its growth plan.
You can see the dramatic shift in the company's near-term performance in the table below, which highlights the critical decline in the original business model's output:
| Metric | Q3 2024 Performance (Kidpik Legacy) | Change vs. Q3 2023 | New 2025 Revenue Focus |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net Revenue | $1.0 million | Decrease of 69.2% | Nina Footwear & Accessories |
| Shipped Items | 107,000 items | Decrease from 292,000 items | Brand/Category Extensions |
| Average Keep Rate | 67.7% | Decrease from 82.6% | International Expansion |
The entire investment thesis is now a bet on the new management's ability to grow the Nina Footwear business, not a recovery in the children's subscription box market. If you want a deeper dive into the valuation of the combined entity, you should read more on Breaking Down Kidpik Corp. (PIK) Financial Health: Key Insights for Investors.
Profitability Metrics
When you look at Kidpik Corp. (PIK)'s profitability, the immediate takeaway is a deep operating loss, but with a surprisingly strong gross margin. The company's financial picture, especially in the Trailing Twelve Months (TTM) leading up to October 2025, is heavily influenced by a strategic wind-down of its subscription service ahead of the merger with Nina Footwear.
Here's the quick math on the TTM figures, which serve as our best proxy for the 2025 fiscal year data. With TTM Revenue at approximately $7.78 million, we can translate the core profitability ratios into dollar amounts for a clearer picture of the operational challenge.
- Gross Profit Margin: 69.03%
- Operating Profit Margin: -64.64%
- Net Profit Margin: -102.25%
Gross Profit vs. Operating Loss: A Telling Gap
Kidpik Corp. (PIK)'s Gross Profit Margin of 69.03% is actually a standout figure, translating to roughly $5.37 million in gross profit on $7.78 million in TTM revenue. This margin is exceptional, sitting well above the typical subscription box industry benchmark of 40-50% per box. This suggests the core product sourcing and pricing model is highly effective. Without a major inventory write-down, however, the margin for Q3 2024 would have been a more moderate 54.3%, still strong but showing the one-time boost in the reported TTM figures.
But here's the problem: the high gross profit is completely overwhelmed by operating expenses. The Operating Profit Margin sits at a staggering -64.64%, resulting in an Operating Loss of approximately -$5.03 million. This massive gap shows the company's cost management-specifically in areas like shipping, handling, and general administration-is not sustainable for a standalone business. They simply weren't converting that excellent gross profit into operating profit.
Profitability Trends and Operational Efficiency
The trend over the past year is one of managed contraction, not organic growth. Revenue has been in a sharp decline, with Q3 2024 revenue dropping 69.2% year-over-year to just $1.0 million, as the company ceased marketing and new inventory purchases to focus on the merger. The Net Profit Margin of -102.25%, a Net Loss of about -$7.95 million, confirms the severe financial distress of the legacy business model.
The narrowing of the Net Loss in Q3 2024, from $1.9 million to $0.9 million, is not a sign of operational success, but rather a result of eliminating marketing spend and reducing other costs in preparation for the merger. This is a survival strategy, not a growth plan. The operational efficiency challenge is clear: the company's cost structure was too heavy for its declining sales base, a common issue for subscription businesses that fail to scale efficiently. You can learn more about the strategic pivot by reviewing the Mission Statement, Vision, & Core Values of Kidpik Corp. (PIK).
This is defintely a case where the gross profit tells a story of product-market fit, but the operating loss reveals a failure of execution and scale management.
| Profitability Metric (TTM to Oct 2025) | Value (Ratio) | Approx. Value (USD) | Industry Benchmark (Subscription Box) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | 69.03% | $5.37 Million | 40-50% |
| Operating Profit Margin | -64.64% | -$5.03 Million | N/A (typically positive for mature firms) |
| Net Profit Margin | -102.25% | -$7.95 Million | N/A (typically positive for mature firms) |
Debt vs. Equity Structure
If you're looking at Kidpik Corp. (PIK)'s balance sheet, the direct takeaway is this: the company is currently in a highly precarious financial state, primarily due to a severe erosion of its equity base, which is a much bigger issue than its debt load alone. The financing strategy has hit a wall, shifting the focus from growth funding to financial survival.
As of the most recent reporting periods in 2024, Kidpik Corp. (PIK)'s total debt stood at approximately $3.9 million USD. This debt is not massive in absolute terms for a public company, but its composition and the context of the equity side of the ledger are what matter. For instance, in mid-2024, the total debt was around $3.006 million against shareholder equity of $5.375 million, giving a Debt-to-Equity (D/E) ratio of about 55.9%. That 55.9% ratio looks manageable on its face-especially when the Apparel Retail industry average D/E ratio is around 1.2 (or 120%), meaning Kidpik Corp. (PIK) technically uses less debt relative to equity than its peers. But that number is misleading.
The real issue is that the company has been burning through cash, pushing its equity into negative territory, which is why you also see a reported D/E ratio of -248.86% in the most recent quarter (MRQ). Here's the quick math: when a company's total liabilities exceed its total assets, shareholder equity turns negative, and the D/E ratio becomes a negative, nearly meaningless number that signals deep financial distress. That's a huge red flag.
- Total Debt (Sept 2024): Approximately $3.9 million USD.
- D/E Ratio Reality: The ratio is distorted, reflecting negative shareholder equity.
- Lost Funding: Failed to sell $1.5 million in convertible notes.
This negative equity situation is the reason for the most critical event in 2025: the delisting from the Nasdaq Capital Market in December 2024, as the company could not comply with the minimum shareholders' equity rule. This move to the OTC Pink Market signals a major loss of investor confidence and liquidity. Also, the planned merger with Nina Footwear, which was expected to close in Q1 2025 and 'strengthen Kidpik's balance sheet', was terminated, costing the company the opportunity to sell $1.5 million worth of convertible notes. That's a significant blow to a company seeking any equity-based funding.
The company's current financing strategy is less about balancing debt and equity and more about finding any capital to stay afloat. They are now exploring strategic alternatives like a potential asset sale, another merger, or even liquidation. The inability to execute on the convertible note sale shows how difficult it is for a delisted company with negative equity to raise capital through either debt or equity markets. This limits future growth and puts the business's continuity at defintely high risk. To understand who is still holding the bag, you should be Exploring Kidpik Corp. (PIK) Investor Profile: Who's Buying and Why?
Liquidity and Solvency
If you're looking at Kidpik Corp. (PIK) right now, the most direct takeaway is that its current liquidity position is extremely tight, largely driven by a significant reliance on inventory and a negative cash flow from core operations. The company's ability to cover its short-term debts is a major near-term risk, especially given the ongoing corporate transition.
As of the Most Recent Quarter (MRQ) ending in October 2025, the company's liquidity ratios paint a clear picture of stress. The Mission Statement, Vision, & Core Values of Kidpik Corp. (PIK) speak to a future vision, but the balance sheet shows the immediate reality. Here's the quick math on their ability to meet obligations:
| Metric | Definition (Plain English) | MRQ Value (Oct 2025) | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | Current Assets / Current Liabilities (Ability to pay short-term debt) | 0.59 | For every $1 in short-term debt, PIK has only $0.59 in assets to cover it. |
| Quick Ratio (Acid-Test) | (Cash + Receivables) / Current Liabilities (Ability to pay without selling inventory) | 0.01 | Excluding inventory, PIK has only $0.01 to cover every $1 of short-term debt. |
A Current Ratio below 1.0 is a red flag, meaning current liabilities exceed current assets. Kidpik Corp.'s ratio of 0.59 is defintely a concern, but the Quick Ratio of just 0.01 is the real alarm, showing almost no liquid assets outside of inventory to pay immediate bills. This suggests the company is heavily reliant on selling its existing stock to generate cash, a strategy that has been central to their operations as they focused on clearing inventory ahead of the merger.
Working Capital and Cash Flow Trends
The trend in working capital-the capital available for day-to-day operations-has been negative. For the Trailing Twelve Months (TTM) ending in June 2024, the change in working capital was a negative $2.04 million. This continuous drain indicates that the company's short-term assets are not growing fast enough to cover its short-term obligations, which is a classic sign of a business under pressure.
Looking at the cash flow statement overview for the TTM ending June 30, 2024, you can see where the cash is coming from-and where it isn't. Operating cash flow is the most critical metric for a healthy business, and Kidpik Corp. is deeply negative here.
- Operating Cash Flow: A loss of $1.75 million. This means the core business is burning cash, not generating it.
- Investing Cash Flow: A use of $0.49 million. This represents a modest investment in property, plant, and equipment.
- Financing Cash Flow: A positive inflow of $2.41 million. This is the critical point: the company is relying on external funding, like debt or equity issuance, to keep the lights on and offset the cash burn from operations.
The company's primary strength, if you can call it that, is its ability to secure financing, which was essential to bridge the gap until the merger with Nina Footwear Corp. closed on May 21, 2025. However, this financing-driven liquidity is not sustainable long-term without a profitable core business.
Near-Term Liquidity Concerns
The biggest liquidity concern isn't just the low ratios; it's the corporate context. The company's stock was suspended from trading on Nasdaq in late 2024 and was expected to transition to the OTC Pink Market. This delisting significantly reduces the stock's market liquidity, making it harder for investors to sell shares and potentially complicating future capital raises. The entire financial profile is now tied to the success of the merger and the combined entity's post-merger liquidity, which is a massive unknown for investors looking at the pre-merger Kidpik Corp. (PIK) numbers.
Valuation Analysis
You're looking at Kidpik Corp. (PIK) and trying to figure out if the stock is a bargain or a value trap. Honestly, the valuation picture is complex and reflects a company undergoing significant distress and transition, including the May 2025 reverse merger with Nina Footwear Corp.. The core takeaway is this: traditional metrics signal a company in deep financial trouble, but the low Enterprise Value-to-EBITDA (EV/EBITDA) suggests a potential, albeit high-risk, turnaround play if you believe in the newly combined entity.
The stock price trend over the last 12 months has been brutal, showing extreme volatility and a major decline. Kidpik Corp. was trading in a 52-week range from a low of $0.001 to a high of $4.900. As of mid-November 2025, the stock price for the PIKM ticker (OTC) was around $0.001, a dramatic drop that followed a Nasdaq delisting notice. This kind of price action is a clear warning sign that the market has lost faith in the company's standalone future. One forecast still projects an average annualized price of $2.33 for 2025, but that's a massive disconnect from the current trading reality. You need to focus on what the ratios are telling you right now.
Here's the quick math on the key valuation multiples for the 2025 fiscal year, or the most recent trailing twelve months (TTM) data:
- Price-to-Earnings (P/E) Ratio: The P/E ratio is effectively meaningless, reported as 0.00 (as of October 31, 2025) or a negative -0.59 (TTM, as of October 24, 2025). A negative P/E simply tells you the company is losing money, which is the case for Kidpik Corp. as it works toward profitability.
- Price-to-Book (P/B) Ratio: The P/B ratio is also negative, reported at approximately -1.92 (Most Recent Quarter, as of October 24, 2025). A negative P/B ratio is a serious signal, meaning the company has negative book value-its total liabilities exceed its total assets. This is defintely not a value stock by traditional measures.
- Enterprise Value-to-EBITDA (EV/EBITDA) Ratio: This is the one metric that offers a glimmer of hope, standing at approximately 4.7x. The Enterprise Value is estimated at around $7.04 million. Compared to a Consumer Discretionary sector average of around 9.4x, this low multiple suggests the company's operating cash flow (EBITDA) is cheap relative to its total value. This is only true if the company can sustain and grow that EBITDA, which is a big 'if.'
The dividend situation is straightforward: Kidpik Corp. does not pay a dividend. The dividend yield and payout ratio are both 0.00%. The company is focused on survival and reinvesting any capital, not returning it to shareholders.
Analyst consensus is sparse and mixed, which is common for a micro-cap stock undergoing a major corporate action. Some technical indicators point to a 'Strong Sell,' reflecting the recent price plunge and delisting concerns. However, other models suggest a 'Neutral' sentiment with a price target of around $2.35 by December 2025. What this estimate hides is the high-risk nature of the stock. The consensus Earnings Per Share (EPS) forecast for the next financial year is a loss of -$0.72, which reinforces the negative P/E ratio.
So, is Kidpik Corp. Overvalued or Undervalued? Based on the negative P/E and P/B, it's a distressed asset, not a classic undervalued stock. But the low 4.7x EV/EBITDA multiple suggests the market is pricing in a significant discount on the operating business, offering a high-risk opportunity for investors who believe the Nina Footwear Corp. merger can successfully right the ship. For a deeper dive into the company's operational risks, check out the full post: Breaking Down Kidpik Corp. (PIK) Financial Health: Key Insights for Investors.
Risk Factors
You need to look past the old Kidpik Corp. (PIK) subscription model; the company's entire risk profile fundamentally changed in 2025 due to its strategic pivot and financial distress. The biggest near-term risk is the successful integration and turnaround of the newly merged entity, which is expected to be renamed Nina Holding Corp. This isn't a minor tweak; it's a wholesale business model shift.
Here's the quick math: Kidpik Corp. was hemorrhaging cash, reporting a net loss of approximately -$887.94 thousand in Q3 2024. That kind of burn rate is simply unsustainable without a massive injection of capital or a strategic lifeline, which is why the merger with Nina Footwear Corp. became the central focus. The company has essentially ceased marketing for the Kidpik subscription service and stopped new inventory purchases, signaling the wind-down of its original business line to focus on the new footwear and accessories venture.
Operational and Financial Risks Post-Merger
The transition itself is a minefield of operational risk. The combined company must prove it can generate positive cash flow quickly, especially after the delisting from Nasdaq in early 2025. This move to the OTC Pink Market (trading under PIKM) means significantly reduced transparency and increased stock price volatility for you, the investor. Plus, the initial termination of the merger agreement in January 2025 meant the company lost the opportunity to sell $1.5 million in convertible debentures, highlighting the severe liquidity crunch it faced.
- Liquidity and Funding: A history of losses means a constant need for new capital.
- Integration Failure: Merging two distinct businesses is tough; failure to integrate operations or customer bases is a major threat.
- Valuation Uncertainty: The stock's move to the OTC market reduces visibility and analyst coverage, making valuation defintely harder.
The good news is the merger is expected to retain Kidpik's significant net operating loss (NOL) carryforwards, estimated at approximately $43 million. This is a massive tax shield for the combined company's future profits, but only if they actually achieve profitability.
External and Strategic Headwinds
The company's strategic decision to merge and shift focus is a direct response to the external pressures of the competitive kids' subscription box market and its own inability to scale profitably. Now, the new entity faces competition in the women's and kids' dress shoe and accessories space. While the company is looking to grow Nina Footwear through international expansion and brand extensions, the market for discretionary apparel and footwear remains highly sensitive to macroeconomic conditions and consumer spending habits.
Regulatory risks are also heightened by the delisting. While the company is exploring strategic alternatives like a potential asset sale, liquidation, or even bankruptcy, the primary mitigation strategy is the successful execution of the merger with Nina Footwear. The entire investment thesis now rests on the new management team's ability to execute a turnaround in the footwear business, leveraging the new scale and the NOL asset. You can read more about the company's long-term vision here: Mission Statement, Vision, & Core Values of Kidpik Corp. (PIK).
| Risk Category | 2025 Impact/Metric | Actionable Investor Insight |
|---|---|---|
| Financial Viability | Q3 2024 Net Loss: -$0.9 million | Cash burn is severe; look for positive cash flow from the combined entity in 2025 filings. |
| Strategic/Operational | Merger with Nina Footwear Corp. (Closed May 2025) | The core business is shifting; evaluate the new management's track record in footwear, not subscription boxes. |
| Market/Regulatory | Delisted from Nasdaq to OTC Pink Market (PIKM) | Expect higher volatility and lower trading liquidity. Due diligence is harder due to reduced SEC reporting. |
| Mitigation Value | Expected retention of $43 million in NOL carryforwards | This is the most tangible financial benefit of the merger; it provides a significant future tax advantage. |
Growth Opportunities
The future growth prospects for Kidpik Corp. (PIK) are defintely not about the kids' subscription box anymore; they are entirely tied to the May 2025 merger with Nina Footwear Corp.. The core takeaway is that the company has executed a radical pivot, shifting its focus to an established, multi-generational footwear brand with a planned name change to Nina Holding Corp..
The strategic move is designed to inject new life-and revenue-into the business, moving away from the struggling subscription model which saw Q3 2024 revenue drop to just $1.0 million, a 69.2% year-over-year decrease. The new growth story centers on leveraging the Nina Footwear brand's heritage and its established market position in women's and kids' dress shoes.
New Growth Drivers: Footwear and International Expansion
The key growth drivers post-merger are a complete overhaul of the business model. The management team's plan is to refocus resources on the new core business: Nina Footwear. This isn't just a simple brand acquisition, but a multi-pronged strategy to maximize the value of the combined entity.
Here are the clear drivers for the new Kidpik Corp. (PIK) growth trajectory:
- Brand and Category Extensions: Expanding the Nina Footwear product lines beyond its current offering.
- International Expansion: Taking the Nina brand into new global markets, which Kidpik's original business had only minimal presence in, reporting only $2.3 million in international revenue in 2023.
- Delman Brand Resurrection: Reviving the Delman shoe brand, mining the extensive Nina Footwear archive for additional value.
Financial Outlook and Competitive Edge
While there are no reliable consensus analyst revenue forecasts for the combined entity's 2025 fiscal year, the financial strategy is clear: use the merger to strengthen the balance sheet and increase cash flow. The most significant financial advantage is the expected retention of approximately $43 million in net operating loss (NOL) carryforwards. That's a huge asset that can shelter future profits from taxes. It helps a ton with the bottom line.
The competitive advantage shifts from a crowded kids' subscription market-projected to hit $1.2 billion by 2025 but where Kidpik had minimal differentiation-to a more established and resilient footwear segment. The original Kidpik business had a high customer acquisition cost of $42 per subscriber and a low retention rate of 22.3%, which is a tough treadmill to be on. The new competitive edge is now rooted in the Nina brand's seventy-plus years of history and the financial efficiency gained from the NOLs.
For a deeper look into the stakeholders behind this pivot, you should read Exploring Kidpik Corp. (PIK) Investor Profile: Who's Buying and Why?
Next Step: Finance should model the projected tax savings from the $43 million NOL carryforwards against the historical revenue of Nina Footwear to establish a preliminary 2026 earnings estimate for the newly formed Nina Holding Corp..

Kidpik Corp. (PIK) DCF Excel Template
5-Year Financial Model
40+ Charts & Metrics
DCF & Multiple Valuation
Free Email Support
Disclaimer
All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.
We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site—including articles or product references—constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.
All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.